• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
ABIL
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
    • North America
      • Canada
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • Hong Kong
  • Global Immigration
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Spain
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
      • South Africa
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • China
      • Hong Kong
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Africa
  • Services
    • Corporate Services
    • Compliance Services
    • Global Immigration Services
    • Government Policy
    • Complex Cases
    • Investment Services
    • Litigation Services
    • Pro Bono Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Videos & Recordings
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

UNITED KINGDOM: ‘Right To Rent’ Checks Take Force for West Midlands

December 22, 2014/in News, United Kingdom /by ABIL

Landlords in the West Midlands must now undertake “right to rent” checks on all prospective tenants. The checks, which took force in the Midlands on December 1, 2014, come as part of a rolling implementation of the government’s latest immigration bill.

To adequately perform these checks, private landlords, letting agents, and homeowners who let rooms must obtain evidence of an individual’s identity and citizenship. This may come in the form of official documents such as a passport or biometric residence permit. If a prospective tenant does not have his or her documentation because of a pending Home Office application, landlords may use an online “right to rent” tool.

Failure to undertake the appropriate checks may result in fines of up to £3,000.

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2014-12-22 15:02:152020-01-22 15:02:55UNITED KINGDOM: ‘Right To Rent’ Checks Take Force for West Midlands

ITALY: New Quotas for Apprenticeship and Intership Programs

December 22, 2014/in Italy, News /by ABIL

The Italian government has released new quotas for apprenticeship and internship programs. Also, failure to report presence in Italy will now result in fines.

15,000 new quotas have been issued to allow non-EU nationals to come to Italy for apprenticeship and internship programs. This amount includes:

  • 7,500 quotas for those foreigners coming for apprenticeship programs organized by authorized institutions. Upon completion of the program, the foreigner will receive from the organizing entity a certificate showing the acquired skills;
  • 7,500 quotas for those foreigners coming for internships to complete a course of study in the home country.

Also, through Law no.161/2014, the Italian government has implemented changes to Italy’s Immigration Law (Decree no. 286/1998), mainly in relation to procedures for expulsions and repatriations of undocumented immigrants. The most significant change, which would mostly affect business visitors, is the introduction of a fine of €103 to €309 for foreigners who fail to declare their presence to the police within eight days of entry. Such report must be filed, for example, by non-visa nationals who enter Italy from another Schengen country and who are not staying in a hotel.

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2014-12-22 14:32:582020-01-22 14:33:27ITALY: New Quotas for Apprenticeship and Intership Programs

CANADA: Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Pilot Program

December 22, 2014/in Canada, News /by ABIL

In December 2014, CIC announced the anticipated launch in late January 2015 of a new federal investor program, the Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Pilot Program.

Pursuant to the Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Pilot Program, applicants will be required to make a non-guaranteed investment of $2 million for a period of 15 years to the Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Fund. The Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Fund will be used to fund Canada-based start-up companies with high growth potential. The previous federal Investor Program, closed to applications in February 2014 by CIC, required a guaranteed investment of $800,000 and was criticized for failing to generate new investment and jobs in Canada.

To be eligible for the Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Pilot Program, applicants must possess a net worth of at least $10 million. This net worth must be evidenced by a due diligence report issued by a designated service provider to prove that the funds were obtained from a lawful, profit-making business or investment activities. In addition, applicants must meet the minimum official language threshold for knowledge of English or French, as demonstrated by taking a designated English or French test recognized by CIC. Applicants normally must have completed a minimum of one year of post-secondary studies, as evidenced by a Canadian post-secondary credential or an Educational Credential Assessment made of their foreign academic records by one of the designated Educational Credential Assessment agencies. However, it will be possible for applicants who have a net worth of at least $50 million to request an exemption from the Educational Credential Assessment requirement.

CIC will accept up to a maximum of 500 applications within a specified period that has yet to be determined. Subsequently, a random lottery will be performed to select applications for processing until approximately 50 approved investor applications are finalized.

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2014-12-22 13:55:342020-01-22 13:56:54CANADA: Immigrant Investor Venture Capital Pilot Program

Short-Term Visas: A Country-by-Country Overview

December 22, 2014/in Belgium, France, News, Peru, South Africa, United Kingdom /by ABIL

This article provides an overview of various countries’ short-term visa options for temporary assignments.

Belgium

Under Belgian law, there are several work permit exemptions for short-term assignments.  One is the Vander Elst exemption: if some conditions are met, no work permit is required for non-EEA (European Economic Area = European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway) workers employed by a company that is established in an EEA Member State and who come to Belgium to provide services.

Training at the Belgian site of a multinational group can also be possible depending on the circumstances (for example, nationality of employee and location of employer) without a work permit for up to three months.  On-the-job training is possible on a very limited scale only: the training cannot involve “significant productive interventions” within the company.

Foreign employees who test prototypes of vehicles or other prototypes developed by an accredited research facility do not need a work permit.  The exemption is limited to the required testing time, and up to four weeks per calendar year per employee.

Initial product assembly and/or first installation does not require a work permit if it is an essential part of a supply agreement, is necessary for the use of the product, and is provided by qualified and/or specialized employees of the supplier who are posted to Belgium.  This exemption is limited to eight days and does not apply to construction workers.

The exemption for urgent maintenance and repair work performed by specialized technical workers on a product supplied by the foreign employer to a Belgian customer is limited to a stay in Belgium of five days per month.

Fast-track work permits are available for specialized technical workers who are posted to Belgium and who come to Belgium to install, start up, or repair products manufactured or supplied by their foreign employer.  The work may not take longer than six months.

Training at the Belgian site of a multinational group may be fast-tracked if no work permit exemption can be invoked.

Canada

Companies sending their employees to Canada for six months or less may opt for their employees to enter Canada as Business Visitors where their activities will be confined to “business visitor” activities within the meaning of Canada’s regulatory framework and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) if the employees are citizens of the United States or Mexico.  Permissible business visitor activities include attending business meetings, performing after-sales services, scoping and information gathering, giving training at a Canadian affiliate, and performing sales to defined clients.  While business visitors cannot perform hands-on work in Canada, their business visitor activities may permit companies to achieve certain short-term objectives in Canada without requiring a work permit.  Citizens of countries requiring a temporary resident visa (TRV) to enter Canada must apply for the TRV by demonstrating their required business activities in Canada, whereas foreign nationals who do not require a TRV to enter Canada should travel with a Business Visitor Invitation letter from the Canadian destination company.

In other cases where hands-on work will be performed in Canada during the short-term assignment, the employees will need work permits and, in some instances, Labour Market Impact Assessments (LMIAs) to be granted the work permits.  Companies may wish to seek an exemption to the costly and lengthy LMIA process wherever possible via one of the LMIA exemption categories, such as Intra-Company Transferees (C12 or NAFTA T24) or NAFTA Professionals (T23).  If proceeding by way of the LMIA, companies should consider whether a variation to the minimum advertising requirements exists for the Canadian position in question, to ease their recruitment and advertising efforts in seeking the LMIA if applicable.

If the Canadian company is a start-up, it may be possible to obtain an initial work permit for up to one year if the company is sufficiently advanced in its operations.  Typically, a start-up should have leased premises, particularly in the case of Specialized Knowledge Intra-Company Transferees, and must demonstrate plans to staff the Canadian business and be financially sound enough to pay the employees’ salaries.

In very unique circumstances, companies may seek a work permit for an employee pursuant to the C10 Significant Benefits category of the LMIA exemption where the employee’s presence in Canada will have a demonstrated significant social, cultural, or economic benefit in Canada.

France

Business Visitor of Less Than 90 days

Foreign nationals may come to France under a business visitor status if their stay in France is for less than 90 days, and their activity in France is limited to business visitor activity.

A business visitor may attend meetings, prospect for business, and negotiate agreements. This activity may be carried out for his or her own personal account or in the name of his or her foreign employer.  However, this activity may not be carried out in the name of a French business or create value for French business.

There are two types of classifications for business visitors:

1. The Schengen visa for short-term business visits; and

2. Visa-free entry for third-country nationals who are exempt from the visa requirement by treaty or bilateral agreement with the third country national’s home country (e.g., United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Mexico).  These foreign nationals do not need a visa to enter France as long as their assignment within the Schengen space does not exceed 90 days over any 180-day period and their activity is limited to that of an authorized business visitor.  (The Schengen Area consists of 26 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands (Holland), Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.)

They should remain on the home country payroll, not be subordinated to the management of the host entity in France, and not carry out any productive work in France.  Tasks that clearly fit into allowed business visitor activity include attending meetings, seminars, negotiations, visiting sites, and exploring business opportunities.

If the French consulate considers that the activity in France requires a work permit, it will refuse the business visa application and require the third-country national to apply for a work permit with the labor authorities before visa issuance.

Italy

According to a decree of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of May 11, 2011, a business visitor can come to Italy for a short stay (90 days in a 180-day period) for “travel that has an economic/commercial basis, to make contacts or conduct negotiations, to learn or carry out maintenance and repairs on equipment and machinery purchased or sold pursuant to a commercial contract or joint venture agreement.”

It is advisable to have a contract in place between the sending company and the host company that regulates the services the sending company is to provide the host company for hands-on activities other than normal business activities such as attending exhibitions, business meetings, and negotiations with potential customers.

The application of this rule requires review on a case-by-case basis of what the visitor intends to do in Italy.  The criteria to be taken into account include:

  • There must be a foreign employer who directs the employment;
  • Profits must go to the foreign employer;
  • Profits must accrue abroad;
  • The foreign employer should pay the visitor;
  • Services being performed are not ones for which an Italian worker would normally be hired, are not inherently part of the Italian labor market, and are not primarily benefiting the Italian entity as local work; and
  • There should an agreement in place between the foreign (sending) company and the Italian (host) company.

Non-visa nationals must have documents (such as invitation letters and assignment letters from their employers) supporting the scope and duration of the visit.

Visa nationals (citizens of countries that do not have a visa waiver program with Italy) must apply for business visas.

Mexico

The extensive changes in Mexican immigration law as of November 2012 eliminated the more than 30 former immigration statuses and subcategories.  Those were replaced by just three statuses: Visitor, Temporary Resident, and Permanent Resident.

Visitor status is appropriate for short-term assignments of up to 180 days.  Foreign nationals in this category may engage in most kinds of business and work activities, as long as they are remunerated on foreign payrolls.  Mexican law does not distinguish among business activities.

Nationals from several designated countries may freely enter Mexico in business visitor status without having to apply for a visa.  Visa-waivered entry is also allowed for “regulated nationalities” under several schemes, such as having a valid U.S. visa of any kind, or permanent residence in the United Kingdom, Japan, United States, Canada, or the Schengen countries.

Visitor status may allow the foreigner to perform job duties, but it entails restrictions on activities such as opening a bank account, signing on behalf of the company, signing a lease contract, and some other issues related to a business visitor’s ability to live comfortably in Mexico.

Peru

The Peruvian immigration authority (MIGRACIONES) has no specific visa that may be obtained quickly for short-term assignments. When technical workers, for example, are coming to work in Peru, they must obtain work permits, which take approximately 30 to 45 days. The work permit may be either a temporary worker visa (for foreign workers on a local company’s payroll) or an appointed worker temporary visa (for workers who are not staff of the local company).

Appointed workers are those who come to Peru with no intention of establishing a residence to carry out labor activities assigned by their foreign employers for limited and defined terms to perform specific tasks or duties, or to perform work that requires professional, commercial, or technical knowledge or any other type of highly specialized knowledge. This category applies to consultants or advisors. Although they are paid by a company abroad, they must pay taxes in Peru.

To obtain this type of visa (Visa Temporal de Trabajador Designado), the following documents must be legalized by a Peruvian consulate abroad or certified by apostille abroad:

  • A Service Agreement or Technical Service Agreement (TSA) executed by the foreign entity that will provide the services (Provider) and the local entity receiving the services (Beneficiary Company).
  • An appointment letter issued by the Provider appointing the foreign consultant who will come to Peru under the Service Agreement.
  • A letter from the Beneficiary Company confirming that it will be the recipient of the services that the foreign consultant will provide.
  • A Certificate of Specialization of the foreign consultant issued by the Provider.
  • The assignee’s original passport in the case of in-country processing before MICRACIONES. If processing before a consul abroad, then a copy of the passport will be duly legalized by the Peruvian consulate abroad or certified by apostille and the consultant will remain abroad for processing.
  • Other documentation of the assignee and the local company as required.

Translations of the documents must be made in Peru by an official public translator.

The processing time from the date of filing of the application with all required documents is 30 working days for “Obtaining Visa Proceeding,” and 60 working days for in-country processing, according to the rules.  At present, however, in-country processing is taking less time.

The holder of this type of visa cannot open a bank account in Peru, obtain a credit card, or obtain a driver’s license, because he or she is not considered a resident.

South Africa

Overview of Short-Term Work Authorizations—Section 11(2) Visas

The South Africa Department of Home Affairs can issue a visitor’s visa to authorize a foreign national to do his or her “work” in South Africa for a period of up to three months.  This visa cannot be extended.

In the past, short-term employment in South Africa was largely characterized by one of two common scenarios, both involving mainly holders of passports who do not need visas to come to the Republic of South Africa (RSA) for “visits” (e.g., from North America and Europe).

The first scenario arose when such a passport holder would, on arrival, claim that he or she was coming for “business.”  Such person would then be admitted for a period of up to three months to do “business” even though, taking advantage of definition confusions, these persons were in fact “working.”

The second scenario occurred where the passport holder arrived at a port of entry and announced that he or she was coming to “work.”  If the person had a letter from the host/South African company confirming that the foreign national was coming to “work” at the offices of the South African company, he or she would usually then have a section 11(2) visitor visa endorsed into his or her passport, at the port of entry.  This would allow the expat to work at the company for whatever period was required, up to three months.

There was, however, no control over how many times such section 11(2) visas would be issued.  There have been cases of people in effect blatantly using the section 11(2) visa to bypass ordinary work visa requirements or processes (and even being advised to do so).  Both situations were massively abused.  The Department of Home Affairs has been compelled to clamp down and get the short-term work authorizations under control.

To understand current Department policy, it is essential to first appreciate the statutory definition, in the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, of what constitutes “work.”  The Act provides very simply that “work” is doing anything that is “consistent with being employed” in a particular field or profession (and similarly with self-employment).  In other words, if you are employed in the United States as an accountant and you are coming to South Africa as part of your job, that constitutes “work” as it is defined.  And if you are coming to “work” for a period of three months or less, you will need to get a section 11(2) visa.

The test is not limited to persons who are employed “in South Africa.”  The Immigration Act expressly provides that the definition includes persons who are not being paid to do that work:  it is irrelevant whether the person is being paid or how he or she is being paid.  The test is deliberately wide and allows for few exceptions or gray areas.

Also, for purposes of the definition of “work,” it is immaterial how long the person is coming to SA to do work.  It can be days, weeks, months, or years.

Obviously, there may be further obscure instances that could challenge the limits of the statutory definition. The best approach to adopt, if you are in doubt, is to get the correct permission to “work.”  The joy in having bypassed bureaucracy will be seriously short-lived if an evasion comes to light.  So, if a person is coming to SA to do “work” for a period of up to three months, he or she needs to get a section 11(2) authorization from Home Affairs.

Rules for Section 11(2) Visa Applications

1.    A section 11(2) visa can only be issued—

a.    On arrival at a port of entry (if the passport is visa-exempt for “visits”; or

b.    At an Embassy or High Commission (if the passport is not visa-exempt for “visits”).

The section 11(2) visa cannot be applied for or issued inside South Africa.

2.    Where the applicant holds a visa-exempt passport, before he or she leaves for SA, he or she must first have applied in writing for and obtained written permission from the relevant South African embassy to ask for the 11(2) on arrival at the port of entry.  Without that prior written permission from the embassy, the port of entry will not issue the section 11(2) visa.

3.    The section 11(2) visa is not, under any circumstances, to be applied for as an interim work visa while a person applies for a longer-term work visa.

4.    Other than in quite exceptional circumstances, the Department of Home Affairs will not entertain applications to extend a section 11(2) visa.

Requirements for Section 11(2) Applications to the Director General

5.    There is no prescribed application form.  The request should be included in a letter addressed to the Consular Section at the relevant embassy.

6.    The request should come from the South African company (or other such entity or person) who will be hosting the foreign national in South Africa.

7.    The request should include the following:

a.    The applicant’s full name, and passport nationality and number, along with a copy of the bio page of the passport;

b.    The proposed departure flight number(s) and date(s) with the port of entry and estimated date and arrival time in SA;

c.    Date of departure from South Africa with corresponding flight details;

d.    How long he or she will be coming to actually work for (as opposed to the total length of the visit);

e.    Full details of contact persons in SA and in the country of origin along with full details of the host company in SA including details of what it does, where, and (where appropriate) statutory registration details;

f.    The applicant’s address and contact details both in SA and in the country of employment;

g.    The applicant’s CV;

h.    Full details of why the person needs to come to SA, to do what and where; how SA and South Africans will benefit from the person’s activities;

i.    A written undertaking by the SA host: (1) assuming full responsibility for all the costs of removing the applicant from SA, should removal become necessary; and (2) assuming responsibility for ensuring that the applicant complies with all the conditions of the visa and the applicable requirements of the Immigration Act; and

j.    Confirmation from the SA host that it is fully aware of the Department’s rules applicable to section 11(2) visas, as set out above.

8.    If the application is approved, the embassy will usually e-mail the written consent back to the applicant, although some embassies ask the applicant to collect the letter.

9.    When the foreign national arrives at the port of entry, he or she will then present to the port of entry the following documentation as part of the request for the section 11(2) visa:

a.    A copy of the request submitted to the embassy; and

b.    The embassy’s written approval of the request.

10.    The passport will then be stamped recording that permission to work has been granted.

11.    Where the applicant is travelling on a non-visa-exempt passport, he or she must apply both for the “consent” and for a visitor visa  to the appropriate embassy or High Commission.

12.    If the visa is approved by the embassy or High Commission, the visa will set out such other conditions as are to be complied with.

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom (UK) offers a number of options for employers seeking to engage migrants on a short-term basis.

While migrants from within the European Economic Area (EEA) and Switzerland are free to enter and work in the UK without prior permission, non-EEA employees must obtain authorization. For short-term work, this typically falls within a sponsored category of the Points-Based System (PBS).

Tier 2 (Intra-Company Transfer—Short-Term Staff)

This route is intended for short-term placement of staff for up to 12 months.  Prospective transferees must have been employed by the sponsoring organization for at least 12 months and meet minimum salary and maintenance requirements.

Tier 2 (Intra-Company Transfer—Graduate Trainee)

This subcategory allows recent graduate trainees on paths for managerial or specialist roles to undertake clearly defined training programs at UK-based branches of their employer.  Graduate Trainees may enter the UK for up to 12 months.  Prospective transferees must have been employed by the sponsoring organization for at least three months and meet minimum salary and maintenance requirements.

Tier 2 (Intra-Company Transfer—Skills Transfer)

Tier 2 (ICT—Skills Transfer) enables employees in graduate occupations to enter the UK for up to six months to learn vital skills for their jobs overseas, or to train their UK colleagues.  Although prospective transferees need not have been employed previously by the sponsoring organization, they still must meet specified minimum salary and maintenance requirements.

Tier 5 (Temporary Worker—Government Authorised Exchange)

This route is intended for migrants moving to the UK to participate in pre-approved schemes to share knowledge and experience through work, research, language, or training programs. The primary purpose of this category is to encourage social and cultural learning through life in the UK.  Migrants in this category may stay in the UK for up 24 months for research, training, or language programs, or up to 12 months for work schemes.  Applicants must meet minimum maintenance requirements.

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2014-12-22 13:43:422020-01-22 15:05:19Short-Term Visas: A Country-by-Country Overview

BELGIUM: Mandatory Fee for Some Residence Requests

December 22, 2014/in Belgium, News /by ABIL

The Belgian federal government has introduced a mandatory “contribution to the administrative costs” (mostly referred to in the press as a “foreigners’ tax”) with regard to some requests for residence authorization by foreigners. The government said this measure is in response to the continuing increase in the number of such applications and the resulting workload.

The federal government agreed to this measure on November 27, 2014. A government bill, also including several other measures, was filed in the Belgian Parliament on November 28, 2014, and the law was approved on December 19, 2014. Before the fee can become effective, it must be implemented by means of a Royal Decree. The fee will probably amount to €215 for work permit holders and €160 for family members.

Most foreigners will need to pay the fixed amount to file an application for residence authorization, either in Belgium or abroad through a Belgian embassy or consulate. If the fee is not paid, the application will be considered inadmissible. The fee will be paid by, among others, work permit holders and their family members; students; some researchers; and Blue Card applicants.

Members of the European Economic Area, Swiss citizens and their family members, asylum seekers and recognized refugees, victims of human trafficking, and unaccompanied minors will be exempt from the new fee.

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2014-12-22 13:41:352020-01-22 13:42:03BELGIUM: Mandatory Fee for Some Residence Requests

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 10, No. 12B • December 15, 2014

December 15, 2014/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. States, Governors File Suit Against President’s Executive Actions on Immigration – The lawsuit singles out a directive on expanding deferred action for childhood arrivals for certain individuals who came to the United States as children and creating a new deferred action program for certain parents of U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

2. USCIS Reminds EB-5 Regional Centers of December 29 Deadline To File I-924As – USCIS reminded approved EB-5 regional centers with designation letters dated on or before September 30, 2014, that they must file Form I-924A for fiscal year 2014 by December 29, 2014.

3. DOL Discontinues H-2B Prevailing Wage Determinations Based on Employer-Provided Wage Surveys – DOL is no longer issuing prevailing wage determinations in the H-2B program based on employer-provided wage surveys, in response to a court order.

4. USDA Releases 2014 Farm Labor Survey, Used for H-2A Adverse Effect Wage Rates – Farm operators paid their hired workers an average wage of $12.12 per hour during the October 2014 reference week, up 1 percent from a year earlier.

5. New Publications and Items of Interes – New Publications and Items of Interes

6. Member News – Member News

7. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. States, Governors File Suit Against President’s Executive Actions on Immigration

Various states and four governors filed suit on December 3, 2014, challenging several of President Barack Obama’s recent executive actions on immigration, announced on November 20 and detailed in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memoranda. The lawsuit singles out a DHS directive on expanding deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA) for certain individuals who came to the United States as children and creating a new deferred action program for certain parents of U.S. citizens or permanent residents. The lawsuit claims that the directive constitutes a “unilateral suspension of the Nation’s immigration laws [that] is unlawful.”

The lawsuit contains numerous quotations from President Obama stating that he can’t change laws himself and needs Congress to pass immigration reform. The suit notes that later, however, he expanded DACA and said, “I just took an action to change the law.” White House spokeswoman Brandi Hoffine responded, “The Supreme Court and Congress have made clear that federal officials can set priorities in enforcing our immigration laws, and we are confident that the president’s executive actions are well within his legal authorities.”

Shortly after the mid-term elections in November 2014, President Barack Obama initiated various executive actions on immigration. The actions challenged in the lawsuit include:

  • Expanding DACA to encompass a broader class of children. DACA eligibility had been limited to those who were under 31 years of age on June 15, 2012, who entered the United States before June 15, 2007, and who were under 16 years old when they entered. Under President Obama’s executive action, DACA eligibility is expanded to cover all undocumented immigrants who entered the United States before the age of 16, not just those born after June 15, 1981. The entry date is adjusted from June 15, 2007 to January 1, 2010. The relief (including work authorization) will now last for three years rather than two. MEMO EXPLAINING THIS ACTION
  • Extending eligibility for deferred action to parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. This new program, called Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA), includes individuals who (i) are not removal priorities under the new policy, (ii) have been in the United States at least five years, (iii) have children who on the date of the announcement (November 20, 2014) were U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, and (iv) present no other factors that would make a grant of deferred action inappropriate. These individuals will be assessed for eligibility for deferred action on a case-by-case basis. They may then apply for work authorization, provided they pay a fee. Each individual will undergo a background check of relevant national security and criminal databases, including DHS and FBI databases. MEMO EXPLAINING THIS ACTION

A letter transmitted by 136 law professors to the White House on November 20, 2014, and updated on November 25, supports President Obama’s legal authority to expand the DACA program and to establish the DAPA program.

FULL TEXT OF THE STATES/GOVERNORS LAWSUIT

The memoranda summarized above, along with the White House address announcing the actions and related USCIS and ICE info, are available HERE.

MODERNIZING & STREAMLINING THE U.S. VISA SYSTEM

ESTABLISHING A WHITE HOUSE TASKFORCE ON NEW AMERICANS

Back to Top


2. USCIS Reminds EB-5 Regional Centers of December 29 Deadline To File I-924As

USCIS recently issued a reminder to all approved EB-5 regional centers with designation letters dated on or before September 30, 2014, that they must file Form I-924A, Supplement to Form I-924, for fiscal year 2014 by December 29, 2014.

If a regional center fails to file the I-924A, USCIS will issue a notice of intent to terminate participation in the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. If a regional center files an incomplete Form I-924A, USCIS may issue a notice of intent to terminate participation.

NOTICE

RELATED Q&A

Back to Top


3. DOL Discontinues H-2B Prevailing Wage Determinations Based on Employer-Provided Wage Surveys

The Department of Labor’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification recently announced that effective December 8, 2014, the Department is no longer issuing prevailing wage determinations (PWDs) in the H-2B program based on employer-provided wage surveys. The Department took this action in response to a court order entered December 5, 2014, in Comite de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agricolas et al v. Solis, No. 14-3557 (3d Cir.). The court’s order vacated a portion of the H-2B wage rule (20 CFR § 655.10(f)) and 2009 wage guidance permitting the use of such surveys.

The Department said that PWD requests pending with the National Prevailing Wage Center (NPC) that seek to use employer-provided surveys will be given the appropriate Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) wage for the occupation. Employers who wish to use a Service Contract Act or Davis Bacon Act wage determination, or a wage based on a collective bargaining agreement, may request redetermination under 20 CFR § 655.10(g). Employers whose prevailing wage determination was based on an employer provided-wage survey, but whose H-2B applications for temporary employment certification have not yet resulted in a final determination by the Chicago NPC, will be notified of their new wage obligation along with their certification letters.

NOTICE

Back to Top


4. USDA Releases 2014 Farm Labor Survey, Used for H-2A Adverse Effect Wage Rates

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) recently issued the Farm Labor Survey (FLS) report establishing the average annual wage rates, by region and the United States, for field and livestock workers. The Department of Labor relies on the average annual combined hourly wage for field and livestock workers to establish the Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWRs) in the H-2A agricultural worker program. The AEWRs are the minimum hourly wage rates the Department has determined must be offered and paid by employers to H-2A workers and workers in corresponding employment, so that the wages of workers similarly employed in the United States will not be adversely affected.

The Department said it is reviewing the USDA FLS average annual wage rates for 2014 and will soon publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing new Adverse Effect Wage Rates (AEWRs) for each state. At that time the rates will become immediately effective.

The FLS report notes that farm operators paid their hired workers an average wage of $12.12 per hour during the October 2014 reference week, up 1 percent from a year earlier. Field workers received an average of $11.52 per hour, up 1 percent from a year earlier. Livestock workers earned $11.29, up 3 percent. The field and livestock worker combined wage rate, at $11.46 per hour, was up 19 cents from October 2013. Hired laborers worked an average of 41.3 hours during the October 2014 reference week, compared with 41.7 hours a year earlier.

DEPARTMENT’S ANNOUNCEMENT

LATEST USDA FLS REPORT

Back to Top


5. New Publications and Items of Interes

The latest edition of the Global Business Immigration Practice Guide has been released by LexisNexis.  Dozens of members of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers co-authored and edited the guide, which is a one-stop resource for dealing with questions related to business immigration issues in immigration hotspots around the world.

The latest edition adds a chapter on Singapore.  Other chapters cover Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Costa Rica, the European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Latchi Delchev, a global mobility and immigration specialist for Boeing, called the guide “first-rate” and said the key strong point of the book is its “outstanding usability.”  She said she highly recommends the book and notes that it “is helpful even to seasoned professionals, as it provides a level of detail which is not easily gained from daily case management.”

Mireya Serra-Janer, head of European immigration for a multinational IT company, says she particularly likes “the fact that the [guide] focuses not just on each country’s immigration law itself but also addresses related matters such as tax and social security issues.”  She noted that the India chapter “is particularly good.  The immigration regulations in India have always been hard to understand. Having a clear explanation of the rules there helps us sort out many mobility challenges.”

Charles Gould, Director-General of the International Co-operative Alliance, said the guide is “an invaluable resource for both legal practitioners and business professionals.  The country-specific chapters are comprehensive and answer the vast majority of questions that arise in immigration practice.  Its clear and easy-to-follow structure and format make it the one volume to keep close at hand.”

This comprehensive guide is designed to be used by:

  • Human resources professionals and in-house attorneys who need to instruct, understand, and liaise with immigration lawyers licensed in other countries;
  • Business immigration attorneys who regularly work with multinational corporations and their employees and HR professionals; and
  • Attorneys interested in expanding their practice to include global business immigration services.

This publication provides:

  • An overview of the immigration law requirements and procedures for over 20 countries;
  • Practical information and tips for obtaining visas, work permits, resident status, naturalization, and other nonimmigrant and immigrant pathways to conducting business, investing, and working in those countries;
  • A general overview of the appropriate options for a particular employee; and
  • Information on how an employee can obtain and maintain authorization to work in a target country.

Each chapter follows a similar format, making it easy to compare practices and procedures from country to country.  Useful links to additional resources and forms are included.  Collected in this Practice Guide, the expertise of ABIL’s attorney members across the globe will serve as an ideal starting point in your research into global business immigration issues.

The list price is $299, but discounts are available.  Contact your Lexis/Nexis sales representative; call 1-800-833-9844 (United States), 1-518-487-3385 (international); fax 1-518-487-3584; or go to the Lexis/Nexis website.

ABIL on Twitter. The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers is now available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration. RECENT ABIL MEMBER BLOG

Back to Top


6. Member News

Vince Lau was a panelist on an AILA National Webinar, “Recent BALCA Cases That May Impact Your Next PERM Application,” held on Thursday, December 11, 2014.

Robert Loughran spoke on November 14, 2014, on U.S. professional and investor visas at the UTSA Texas International Business Accelerator’s foreign investor event, “Invirtiendo en Texas.” The goal of the event was to educate potential foreign entrepreneurs on how to invest in a business in Texas.

Mr. Loughran appeared on Austin’s KVUE on November 21, 2014, to discuss the human side of the president’s executive action on immigration and what documents potential applicants should begin gathering.

Mr. Loughran was quoted in the Houston Chronicle on the procedural and substantive defects of the lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott against the president’s executive action on immigration.

Mr. Loughran spoke on November 7, 2014, on the immigration implications of “Global Tax Planning for Multi-National Families: Coming and Going!,” which focused on the income, estate, and gift tax implications (and planning opportunities) affecting U.S. and foreign persons who exit or enter the United States, at the Annual Meeting of the California Tax Bar and California Tax Policy Conference in Coronado, California.

Cyrus Mehta co-authored several new blog entries. “Let’s Hope That’s What It Really Means: Does Executive Initiative Really Provide For Early Adjustment of Status” “Justice, Justice Shall Thou Pursue: Why the Lawsuit Against the Immigration Accountability Executive Actions Is a Waste of Time and Money”

Angelo Paparelli has published a new blog post. “Worksite Harmony and the President’s Executive Actions: It’s All About Immigration Timing”

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted in an article in the New York Times, “Some of the Rich Collect Art. Others Collect Passports,” about wealthy investors shopping for visas or citizenship, which was published on December 13, 2014. “I think that after 24 years, it’s appropriate for Congress to consider adjusting that level [referring to the $500,000 minimum for an EB-5 immigrant investor green card].”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in the December 9, 2014, issue of Bloomberg Businessweek about the diversity green card lottery. According to Mr. Yale-Loehr, “[a] lottery is not a way to run an immigration system. It doesn’t strengthen family ties, promote our economic interests, or rescue refugees. Congress should abolish the program.”

Back to Top


7. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs

Department of State Visa Bulletin

Visa application wait times for any post

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2014-12-15 00:00:442019-09-05 06:29:53News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 10, No. 12B • December 15, 2014

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 10, No. 12A • December 01, 2014

December 01, 2014/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Obama Takes Executive Action on Immigration – Shortly after the mid-term elections, President Barack Obama initiated several executive actions on immigration.

2. Labor Dept. To Modernize PERM Recruitment and Application Requirements – DOL will review the PERM program and relevant regulations with a goal of updating them.

3. Labor Dept. Establishes Interagency Working Group on Worker Protections – The new interagency working group will identify policies and procedures that promote the consistent enforcement of federal labor, employment, and immigration laws to “protect all workers in the U.S.”

4. ABIL Global: Poland – Poland regards special economic zones as an important instrument to stimulate foreign investment. There are new investment opportunities in Polish real estate 12 years after Poland’s accession to the EU.

5. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

6. Member News – Member News

7. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. Obama Takes Executive Action on Immigration

Shortly after the mid-term elections, President Barack Obama initiated several executive actions on immigration.

As outlined in a series of Department of Homeland Security memoranda, the executive actions include, among other things:

Supporting high-skilled business and workers. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will take a number of administrative actions to better enable U.S. businesses to hire and retain highly skilled foreign-born workers and strengthen and expand opportunities for students to gain on-the-job training. For example, DHS notes, “because our immigration system suffers from extremely long waits for green cards, we will amend current regulations and make other administrative changes to provide needed flexibility to workers with approved employment-based green card petitions.”

Some of the actions called for in the memo include:

  • U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) working with the Department of State (DOS) to improve the system for determining when immigrant visas are available to applicants during the fiscal year. DOS has agreed to modify its visa bulletin system “to more simply and reliably make such determinations,” and the memo states an expectation that USCIS will revise its current regulations “to reflect and complement these proposed modifications.”
  • USCIS considering “amending its regulations to ensure that approved, long-standing visa petitions remain valid in certain cases where [beneficiaries] seek to change jobs or employers.”
  • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) developing regulations for notice and comment to expand the degree programs eligible for Optional Practical Training (OPT) and to extend the time period and use of OPT for foreign STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) students and graduates.
  • USCIS issuing guidance or regulations to clarify the standard for granting a national interest waiver green card, with the aim of promoting its greater use.
  • USCIS proposing a program allowing parole status, on a case-by-case basis, to inventors, researchers, and founders of start-up enterprises who may not yet qualify for national interest waivers but “who have been awarded substantial U.S. investor financing or otherwise hold the promise of innovation and job creation through the development of new technologies or the pursuit of cutting-edge research.” The regulation will include income and resource thresholds.
  • USCIS issuing a policy memorandum to provide “clear, consolidated guidance” on the meaning of “specialized knowledge” in adjudicating L-1B petitions.
  • USCIS issuing a policy memorandum providing guidance on worker portability, specifically with respect to what constitutes a “same or similar” job, with a goal of removing “unnecessary restrictions” on “natural career progression.”

MEMO explaining high-skilled business and workers

Enforcement efforts, including commissioning three Joint Task Forces. Joint Task Force East, Joint Task Force West, and Joint Task Force Investigations. All three will incorporate elements of the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Joint Task Force East will be responsible for the southern maritime border and approaches. Joint Task Force West will be responsible for the southern land border and the West Coast. Joint Task Force Investigations will focus on investigations in support of the geographic Task Forces.

The overarching goals of the Southern Border and Approaches Campaign, of which the Joint Task Forces are a part, will be to enforce immigration laws and interdict individuals seeking to enter the U.S. without authorization; degrade international criminal organizations; and decrease the threat of terrorism.

MEMO explaining enforcement efforts

Ending the Secure Communities program and replacing it with the Priority Enforcement Program, and prioritizing criminal offenses for arrest, detention, and removal.

MEMO on Prosecutorial Discretion

MEMO on Secure Communities

Expanding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to encompass a broader class of children. DACA eligibility had been limited to those who were under 31 years of age on June 15, 2012, who entered the United States before June 15, 2007, and who were under 16 years old when they entered. DACA eligibility will be expanded to cover all undocumented immigrants who entered the United States before the age of 16, and not just those born after June 15, 1981. The entry date will be adjusted from June 15, 2007 to January 1, 2010. The relief (including work authorization) will now last for three years rather than two.

MEMO explaning DACA

Extending eligibility for deferred action to parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. This new program, called Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA), will include individuals who (i) are not removal priorities under the new policy, (ii) have been in the United States at least five years, (iii) have children who on the date of the announcement (November 20, 2014) were U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents, and (iv) present no other factors that would make a grant of deferred action inappropriate. These individuals will be assessed for eligibility for deferred action on a case-by-case basis. They may then apply for work authorization, provided they pay a fee. Each individual will undergo a background check of relevant national security and criminal databases, including DHS and FBI databases.

MEMO explaining DAPA

Expanding I-601A provisional waivers to spouses and children of lawful permanent residents. The provisional waiver program DHS announced in January 2013 for undocumented spouses and children of U.S. citizens will be expanded to include the spouses and children of lawful permanent residents, as well as the adult children of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. At the same time, the administration will further clarify the “extreme hardship” standard that must be met to obtain the waiver.

MEMO explaining I-601A waivers

Revising parole rules. DHS will begin rulemaking to identify the conditions under which “talented entrepreneurs” should be paroled into the United States, on the ground that their entry would yield a “significant public economic benefit.” DHS will also support the military and its recruitment efforts by working with the Department of Defense to address the availability of parole-in-place and deferred action to spouses, parents, and children of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents who seek to enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces. DHS will also issue guidance to clarify that when anyone is given advance parole to leave the United States, including those who obtain deferred action, they will not be considered to have departed. Undocumented aliens generally trigger a 3- or 10-year bar to returning to the United States when they depart.

MEMO explaining parole for entrepreneurs

MEMO explaning parole for parole-in-place and deferred action

MEMO explaning advance parole

President Obama also issued a memorandum directing the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, in consultation with other federal agencies, to develop recommendations for improving the U.S. visa system. The recommendations will be developed in consultation with “business people, labor leaders, universities, and other stakeholders.” The recommendations will be geared toward streamlining and improving the legal immigration system—including immigrant and non-immigrant visa processing—”with a focus on reforms that reduce government costs, improve services for applicants, reduce burdens on employers, and combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the system.”

In consultation with stakeholders with relevant expertise in immigration law, they will also develop recommendations “to ensure that administrative policies, practices, and systems use all of the immigrant visa numbers that the Congress provides for and intends to be issued, consistent with demand.” In consultation with technology experts inside and outside the government, they will develop recommendations “for modernizing the information technology infrastructure underlying the visa processing system, with a goal of reducing redundant systems, improving the experience of applicants, and enabling better public and congressional oversight of the system.”

President Obama also announced that he is establishing a White House Task Force on New Americans, an interagency effort “to identify and support state and local efforts at integration that are working and to consider how to expand and replicate successful models.” The Task Force, which will engage with community, business, and faith leaders, as well as state and local elected officials, “will help determine additional steps the federal government can take to ensure its programs and policies are serving diverse communities that include new Americans.” Among other things, the Task Force will submit an “Integration Plan” to President Obama, which will include an assessment of the members’ agencies with respect to integration efforts, and recommendations. The Task Force will also identify and disseminate best practices at the state and local level, collect and disseminate data on immigrant integration, and provide technical assistance.

President Obama has said he would reverse the executive actions if Congress passes a comprehensive immigration legislation that he can sign. Republicans countered that they would fight whatever changes the President orders “tooth and nail,” according to House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio). He said all options were on the table. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said that unilateral executive actions on immigration are like “waving a red flag in front of a bull.”

A letter transmitted by 136 law professors to the White House on November 20, 2014, and updated on November 25, supports President Obama’s legal authority to expand the DACA program and to establish the Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) program.

President Obama also issued an “immigration blueprint,” outlined in “Building a 21st Century Immigration System,” which includes additional proposals.

The memoranda summarized above, along with the White House address announcing the actions and related USCIS and ICE info.

ADDITIONAL MEMORANDA on modernizing and streamlining the U.S. visa system

ADDITIONAL MEMORANDA on establishing the White House Task Force on New Americans

Back to Top


2. Labor Dept. To Modernize PERM Recruitment and Application Requirements

The Department of Labor (DOL) has released a fact sheet announcing that it will review the PERM labor certification program and relevant regulations with a goal of updating them. DOL noted that it has received ongoing feedback that the existing regulatory requirements governing the PERM recruitment process frequently do not align with worker or industry needs and practices.

DOL recently marked the 10th anniversary of the PERM regulations, which govern the labor certification process for the permanent employment of immigrant foreign workers and establish responsibilities of participating employers. The DOL said it has not comprehensively examined and modified the permanent labor certification requirements and process since their inception. This past fiscal year, employers submitted over 70,000 PERM applications requesting foreign workers. The majority of those job openings were for professional occupations in the information technology and science fields.

As part of the new review, DOL will seek input on the current PERM regulations, including how they can be modernized to be more responsive to changes in the national workforce. Specifically, DOL will seek input on the following:

  • Options for identifying labor force occupational shortages and surpluses and methods for aligning domestic worker recruitment requirements with demonstrated shortages and surpluses;
  • Methods and practices designed to modernize U.S. worker recruitment requirements;
  • Processes to clarify employer obligations to ensure that PERM positions are fully open to U.S. workers;
  • Ranges of case processing time frames and possibilities for premium processing; and
  • Application submission and review processes and the feasibility of efficiently addressing nonmaterial errors.

DOL’s Employment and Training Administration may also examine other aspects of the existing PERM regulations to further align the program design with the objectives of the U.S. immigration system and the needs of workers and employers, and to enhance the integrity of the labor certification process.

FACT SHEET

Back to Top


3. Labor Dept. Establishes Interagency Working Group on Worker Protections

The Department of Labor recently announced the creation of an interagency working group to identify policies and procedures that promote the consistent enforcement of federal labor, employment, and immigration laws to “protect all workers in the U.S.” The announcement notes that federal agencies responsible for worker protections seek to protect all workers from exploitation and workers’ rights violations, regardless of immigration status. “Many workers, however, are deterred or prevented from asserting workplace rights and protections. In some cases, employers may exploit immigration status to deter employees from asserting their rights. In other cases, the protections available to workers are unclear,” the announcement notes.

The working group will comprise federal immigration enforcement agencies and federal agencies responsible for worker protections, including the Departments of Labor, Homeland Security, and Justice; the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; and the National Labor Relations Board.

The working group will seek to:

  • Ensure that agencies’ immigration enforcement and worker protection policies promote workers’ cooperation with labor and employment law enforcement authorities without fear of retaliation;
  • Ensure that federal enforcement authorities are not used by parties seeking to undermine worker protection laws by enmeshing immigration authorities in labor disputes; and,
  • Ensure the consistent enforcement of federal labor, employment, and immigration laws.

To achieve these objectives the working group will:

  • Develop policies and procedures to ensure consistent enforcement of labor, employment, and immigration laws;
  • Develop consistent standards and procedures for immigration agencies to contact labor agencies when they encounter a potential labor dispute within the meaning of the Revised Memorandum of Understanding between the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor Concerning Enforcement Activities at Worksites, executed on December 7, 2011;
  • Provide greater clarity to workers, worker representatives, advocates, and employers regarding processes and procedures on the intersection between immigration law enforcement and labor and employment law enforcement;
  • Strengthen processes for staying the removal of, and providing temporary work authorization for, undocumented workers asserting workplace claims and for cases in which a workplace investigation or proceeding is ongoing; and
  • Provide stakeholders open and transparent modes of communication with enforcement authorities.

The working group “will provide opportunities for communication with external stakeholders, including workers, worker representatives, advocates, and employers as appropriate.”

FACT SHEET

Back to Top


4. ABIL Global: Poland

Poland regards special economic zones as an important instrument to stimulate foreign investment. There are new investment opportunities in Polish real estate 12 years after Poland’s accession to the EU.

Poland can be considered an alternative for corporate immigration as compared with other economies of East-Central Europe. Two factors provide the basis for the increased activity of foreign capital in Poland: the development of special economic zones and the lifting of limitations on purchasing real estate by foreigners in Poland.

As with other countries (e.g., China), Poland regards special economic zones as an important instrument for attracting foreign investors. Special economic zones are designated industrial areas prepared for investment for foreign entities. In return for allocating production and operation of the company in Poland, the investor receives a special, beneficial legal status with respect to tax obligations. The primary benefit of investing in the special economic zones is property tax exemption and, above all, income tax exemption, the scale of which depends on the volume of investment. Investments in the special economic zones in Poland require a permit issued in administrative proceedings. According to the latest data, there are more than 7 thousand hectares of land waiting in Poland for foreign capital in the special economic zones.

In the near future, new rules will come into force on state aid granted to entrepreneurs operating under permits to conduct business activity in the special economic zones. The rules will facilitate provisions regulating the proportion of public funds in the investments and the method of accounting for the investments.

The attractiveness of the local market for corporate immigration depends to a large extent on the legal status of the commercial real estate market. In this respect, the current status of the Polish real estate sector has been presented in the annual report of the Polish government devoted to the acquisition of real estate by foreigners (individuals and corporate entities). The report for 2014 highlights the activity of German, Dutch, and Ukrainian capital in Poland. The reports, prepared annually by the Minister of Internal Affairs and Administration, extensively and accurately presents international trading in Polish real estate.

According to the report, in 2013, foreigners were granted a total of 252 permits for the acquisition of land property with a total area of 697.15 hectares. The vast majority of applications had been approved. In Poland, the acquisition of real estate by foreigners requires, in principle, a permit from the Minister of Internal Affairs and Administration. The source of legal restrictions is the Act on the acquisition of real estate by foreigners as of March 24, 1920. The relevant permit is also necessary for the purchase or acquisition by foreigners of shares in companies that are owners or perpetual users of real estate. By May 1, 2016, the permit also will be required for the purchase of forest and agricultural real estate by European Union (EU)/European Economic Area entities. Such status follows from the transitional provisions of the Polish accession to the EU.

Back to Top


5. New Publications and Items of Interest

The 2014 edition of the Global Business Immigration Practice Guide has been released by LexisNexis.  Dozens of members of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers co-authored and edited the guide, which is a one-stop resource for dealing with questions related to business immigration issues in immigration hotspots around the world.

The 2014 edition adds a chapter on Singapore.  Other chapters cover Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Costa Rica, the European Union, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Latchi Delchev, a global mobility and immigration specialist for Boeing, called the guide “first-rate” and said the key strong point of the book is its “outstanding usability.”  She said she highly recommends the book and notes that it “is helpful even to seasoned professionals, as it provides a level of detail which is not easily gained from daily case management.”

Mireya Serra-Janer, head of European immigration for a multinational IT company, says she particularly likes “the fact that the [guide] focuses not just on each country’s immigration law itself but also addresses related matters such as tax and social security issues.”  She noted that the India chapter “is particularly good.  The immigration regulations in India have always been hard to understand. Having a clear explanation of the rules there helps us sort out many mobility challenges.”

Charles Gould, Director-General of the International Co-operative Alliance, said the guide is “an invaluable resource for both legal practitioners and business professionals.  The country-specific chapters are comprehensive and answer the vast majority of questions that arise in immigration practice.  Its clear and easy-to-follow structure and format make it the one volume to keep close at hand.”

This comprehensive guide is designed to be used by:

  • Human resources professionals and in-house attorneys who need to instruct, understand, and liaise with immigration lawyers licensed in other countries;
  • Business immigration attorneys who regularly work with multinational corporations and their employees and HR professionals; and
  • Attorneys interested in expanding their practice to include global business immigration services.

This publication provides:

  • An overview of the immigration law requirements and procedures for over 20 countries;
  • Practical information and tips for obtaining visas, work permits, resident status, naturalization, and other nonimmigrant and immigrant pathways to conducting business, investing, and working in those countries;
  • A general overview of the appropriate options for a particular employee; and
  • Information on how an employee can obtain and maintain authorization to work in a target country.

Each chapter follows a similar format, making it easy to compare practices and procedures from country to country.  Useful links to additional resources and forms are included.  Collected in this Practice Guide, the expertise of ABIL’s attorney members across the globe will serve as an ideal starting point in your research into global business immigration issues.

The list price is $299, but discounts are available.  Contact your Lexis/Nexis sales representative; call 1-800-833-9844 (United States), 1-518-487-3385 (international); fax 1-518-487-3584; or go to the Lexis/Nexis website.

ABIL on Twitter. The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers is now available on Twitter: @ABILImmigration. RECENT ABIL MEMBER BLOG

Back to Top


6. Member News

Klasko Immigration Law Partners, LLP recently announced their ranking as a Tier 1 immigration law firm by U.S. News and World Report and Best Lawyers. The firm received a Tier 1 ranking nationally and in Philadelphia and New York City.

Charles Kuck was quoted in the Global Delivery Report, in “What the U.S. Election Results Mean for the Tech Industry Visa Problem.” He noted, “One thing is clear: the IT industry believes that U.S. schools are not turning out enough qualified individuals. If they were, they would not be using foreign nationals, who cost them far more to hire, given filing and attorney fees, and mandatory wage amounts.

Cyrus Mehta was Discussion Leader of “Working Around the H-1B Debacle” on November 14, 2014, at American Immigration Lawyers Association’s Mexico District Chapter Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Mr. Mehta has co-authored a new blog entry. “The Fate of Executive Action on Immigration After the Midterm Elections”

Mr. Mehta will be presenting on “Representing Children in Immigration Proceedings and the Immigration Executive Orders of President Obama” on December 2, 2014, at a CLE of the Office of the Chief Counsel to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, First Department, New York.

Mr. Mehta was quoted in an article on Forbes.com, “Will President Obama Help Legal Immigrants Too?”

Mr. Mehta was on the “Takeaway” public radio show with John Hockenberry broadcast nationally on November 20, 2014, to discuss President Obama’s executive actions on immigration.

Mr. Mehta has published a summary of President Obama’s recent immigration executive actions.

Angelo Paparelli spoke on KNX 1070 (CBS radio affiliate in Los Angeles) in a one-hour report on President Obama’s executive actions on immigration on November 24, 2014, at 10 am PST. It featured Mr. Paparelli and an opponent of immigration, with extensive audience call-in.

Mr. Paparelli was quoted on Inc.com, in “If You Have Employees, Obama’s Immigration Plans Will Most Likely Affect You.” “Employers should be alert to the possibility that a new population of workers who may have been silent at the worksite may speak up, and employers will want to generally review their employment practices,” he noted. Mr. Paparelli counseled proactively reviewing hiring and screening procedures and considering a “voluntary audit” of I-9 forms.

Stephen Yale-Loehr was quoted on Time.com regarding the potential political fallout of President Obama’s announcement on executive actions to reform the U.S. immigration system. Mr. Yale-Loehr noted that “Republicans will argue that even the smallest executive immigration actions subvert Congress’ power.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was quoted in the New York Times in “Obama’s Executive Order on Immigration Is Unlikely to Include Health Benefits,” published on November 19, 2014. “Just as the president has broad discretion to decide whether to allow undocumented individuals to get a temporary reprieve from deportation, he also has broad authority to decide whether to grant them work authorization and health benefits. In this case, it appears he is willing to grant the former but not the latter.”

Mr. Yale-Loehr was also quoted on President Obama’s executive actions on immigration in the Huffington Post and in the Houston Chronicle.

Back to Top


7. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs

Department of State Visa Bulletin

Visa application wait times for any post

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2014-12-01 00:00:252019-09-05 06:34:07News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 10, No. 12A • December 01, 2014

Archive

  • July 2020
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

ABIL is a corporation with over 40 top-rated immigration law firms and 1,500+ professionals.

News

  • BRAZIL: Accepting Work Authorization Applications Thorugh New Digital Certificate System
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9D • September 22, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9C • September 15, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9B • September 08, 2019

Newsletter Signup

Register to receive news regarding
general business immigration or global
immigration.

© Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) All Rights Reserved 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
  • Global Immigration
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Contact
Scroll to top