• Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
ABIL
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
    • North America
      • Canada
      • United States
    • South America
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Spain
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • Hong Kong
  • Global Immigration
    • North America
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • United States
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Colombia
      • Peru
    • Europe
      • Austria
      • Belgium
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Netherlands
      • Spain
      • Turkey
      • United Kingdom
      • South Africa
    • Asia Pacific & Africa
      • Australia
      • China
      • Hong Kong
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Africa
  • Services
    • Corporate Services
    • Compliance Services
    • Global Immigration Services
    • Government Policy
    • Complex Cases
    • Investment Services
    • Litigation Services
    • Pro Bono Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
    • Blogs
    • News
    • Newsletters
    • Videos & Recordings
    • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 5, No. 1 • January 01, 2009

January 01, 2009/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Challenges Legality of E-Verify Requirement for Federal Contractors – The U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit against the DHS challenging the legality of requiring federal contractors to begin using E-Verify by January 15.

2. DHS Issues Interim Rule on I-9 Verification Documents – The interim rule, among other things, requires that all documents presented during the verification process be unexpired.

3. US-VISIT Expanded To Nearly All Noncitizens – The population of those subject to US-VISIT requirements has been expanded to nearly all non-U.S. citizens, including lawful permanent residents, with some exceptions.

4. New York Documents Designated for Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative – DHS has designated enhanced driver’s licenses and identity documents issued by New York State as acceptable identity and citizenship documents for entering the U.S. at land and sea ports of entry.

5. EADs Extended for Salvadoran TPS Beneficiaries – USCIS announced an automatic extension of the validity of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for eligible Salvadoran TPS beneficiaries for six months, through September 9, 2009.

6. Company Agrees To Pay Largest Settlement Ever in Worksite Enforcement Case – IFCO, the largest pallet management services company in the U.S., has agreed to pay $20.7 million in civil forfeitures and penalties for employing undocumented workers.

7. DHS Issues Final Rule, Notice on H-2B Temporary Nonagricultural Workers – DHS has amended its H-2B regulations regarding temporary nonagricultural workers and their U.S. employers.

8. DHS Issues H-2A Final Rule – DHS has amended its H-2A regulations regarding temporary and seasonal agricultural workers and their U.S. employers.

9. USCIS Announces New Mailing Address Format for National Capital Region Offices – USCIS announced a new address format for offices within the National Capital Region (NCR), affecting all USCIS headquarters offices, the Arlington Asylum Office, and the Washington District Office.

10. ABIL GLOBAL – Current immigration news regarding a specific country each month.

11. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

12. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members

13. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Challenges Legality of E-Verify Requirement for Federal Contractors

Under new regulations, federal contractors and subcontractors will be required to begin using the E-Verify online work authorization verification system starting January 15, 2009. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit on December 23, 2008, against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that challenges the legality of that requirement.

Joining the Chamber as co-plaintiffs in the lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, were the Associated Builders and Contractors, the Society for Human Resources Management, the American Council on International Personnel, and the HR Policy Association.

Robin Conrad, executive vice president of the National Chamber Litigation Center (NCLC), the Chamber’s public policy law firm, said, “the Administration can’t use an Executive Order to circumvent federal immigration and procurement laws. Federal law explicitly prohibits the secretary of Homeland Security from making E-Verify mandatory or from using it to reauthorize the existing workforce.”

The Chamber’s lawsuit challenges the government’s use of an Executive Order coupled with federal procurement law to make E-Verify mandatory for federal contractors with projects exceeding $100,000 and for subcontractors with projects exceeding $3,000. The Chamber also challenged expanding E-Verify to require the reauthorization of existing workers.

“The DHS intends to expand E-Verify on an unprecedented scale in a very short timeframe, and to impose liability on government contractors who are unable to comply,” said Randy Johnson, vice president of Labor, Immigration and Employee Benefits at the Chamber. “Given the current economy, now is not the time to add more bureaucracy and billions of dollars in compliance costs to America’s businesses.”

The Chamber is the world’s largest business federation, representing more than 3 million businesses and organizations of every size, sector, and region. The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), among others, applauded the Chamber’s challenge. Charles H. Kuck, president of AILA, noted, “The idea of using an Executive Order to go beyond clear federal immigration and procurement laws and to impose liability on government contractors who are unable to comply is simply misguided and unlawful.”

Back to Top


2. DHS Issues Interim Rule on I-9 Verification Documents

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is amending its regulations governing the types of acceptable identity and employment authorization documents and receipts that employees may present to their employers for employment authorization verification (Form I-9). The interim rule, effective February 9, 2009:

  • requires that all documents presented during the verification process be unexpired;
  • eliminates List A identity and employment authorization documentation forms I-688, I-688A, and I-688B (Temporary Resident Card and outdated Employment Authorization Cards);
  • adds foreign passports containing certain machine-readable immigrant visas to List A;
  • adds to List A as evidence of identity and employment authorization valid passports for citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), along with Form I-94 or Form I-94A indicating nonimmigrant admission under the Compact of Free Association Between the United States and the FSM or RMI ; and
  • makes technical updates.

The DHS noted that it issues temporary I-551 stamps to legal permanent residents (LPRs) on either unexpired foreign passports or the Arrival-Departure Record (Form I-94), to serve as temporary documentation of LPR status while they wait for the actual Form I-551. Although the regulations refer to temporary I-551 “stamps,” the DHS noted that the Department of State has been affixing machine-readable immigrant visas (MRIVs) that contain a pre-printed temporary I-551 notation in the foreign passports of those immigrating to the U.S. for several years. The pre-printed temporary I-551 notation is triggered after the bearer is admitted to the U.S. as an LPR. To update the regulations to reflect this alternate temporary I-551 document, this rule modifies the reference in List A [8 CFR 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A)(3)] to temporary I-551 stamps on unexpired foreign passports to include pre-printed temporary I-551 notation on MRIVs. Because the pre-printed notation is not included on the I-94, this rule does not make any changes to regulatory references to temporary I-551 stamps on I-94s.

The rule also updates the list of acceptable documents and receipts by including “Form I-94A” next to each reference to the I-94 because the I-94A is nearly identical to the I-94 except that all fields are computer-generated rather than annotated by hand.

The interim rule also replaces the term “employment eligibility” with “employment authorization.” The amended I-9 form reflecting these and other form-related changes was published as an attachment to this rule for “informational purposes.” USCIS’s Web site still has the version of the I-9 form that was revised June 5, 2007.

The interim rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-29874.pdf. Questions and answers are available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/I9_qa_12dec08.pdf.

Back to Top


3. US-VISIT Expanded To Nearly All Noncitizens

The Department of Homeland Security has published a final rule, effective January 18, 2009, that expands the population of those who will be subject to US-VISIT requirements to nearly all non-U.S. citizens, including lawful permanent residents. Exceptions include Canadian citizens seeking short-term admission for business or pleasure under B visas and individuals traveling on A and G visas, among others. Those subject to US-VISIT may be required to provide finger scans, photographs, or other biometric identifiers upon arrival in the U.S. Currently, noncitizens arriving at a U.S. port of entry with a nonimmigrant visa, or those traveling without a visa under the Visa Waiver Program, are subject to US-VISIT requirements with certain limited exceptions.

On August 31, 2004, the Department promulgated an interim final rule that expanded the US-VISIT program to include those seeking admission under the Visa Waiver Program and travelers arriving at designated land border ports of entry. This rule also finalizes that interim final rule and addresses public comments.

The final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-30095.pdf.

Back to Top


4. New York Documents Designated for Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative

Effective December 2, 2008, the Department of Homeland Security has designated enhanced driver’s licenses and identity documents (EDLs) issued by the state of New York as acceptable identity and citizenship documents for entering the U.S. at land and sea ports of entry. U.S. citizens possessing these EDLs will be permitted to present the EDLs, in lieu of passports, as acceptable documents under the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI) when entering the U.S. at land and sea ports of entry.

On October 27, 2007, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Governor of New York signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to develop, issue, test, and evaluate an enhanced driver’s license and identification card with facilitative technology to be used for border crossing purposes. Under the terms of the agreement between DHS and the State of New York, New York will only issue EDLs to U.S. citizens. EDLs also may be issued as photo identification cards to non-drivers.

The notice is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-28535.pdf.

Back to Top


5. EADs Extended for Salvadoran TPS Beneficiaries

USCIS announced an automatic extension of the validity of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for eligible Salvadoran TPS beneficiaries for six months, through September 9, 2009. Initially, the expiration date for Salvadoran EADs was March 9, 2009. USCIS has automatically extended the EAD validity period to allow for the agency to process and re-issue new EADs for such beneficiaries.

USCIS announced on September 24, 2008, that it would extend through September 9, 2010, TPS status for nationals of El Salvador who have already been granted TPS. Salvadoran nationals (and people having no nationality who last habitually resided in El Salvador) who had been granted TPS must have re-registered for the 18-month extension during the 90-day re-registration period that ended on December 30, 2008. TPS does not apply to nationals of El Salvador who entered the U.S. after February 13, 2001.

Details on the automatic extension of the EADs, including the application requirements and procedures, were published on December 15, 2008, at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-29511.pdf.

Back to Top


6. Company Agrees To Pay Largest Settlement Ever in Worksite Enforcement Case

After a large worksite enforcement operation conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), IFCO Systems North America, headquartered in Houston, Texas, and the largest pallet management services company in the U.S., has agreed to pay $20.7 million in civil forfeitures and penalties over four years for employing undocumented workers at its plants.

The settlement amount includes $2.6 million in back pay and penalties relating to IFCO’s overtime violations with respect to 1,700 of its pallet workers. IFCO is also paying $18.1 million in civil forfeitures that will be available to support future law enforcement activities.

Following a tip to ICE in February 2005 that undocumented workers at an IFCO plant in Albany, New York, were observed ripping up their W-2 forms, on April 19, 2006, ICE agents, in concert with other federal and state authorities, conducted a worksite enforcement action at over 40 IFCO pallet plants in 26 states, which resulted in the detention of 1,182 undocumented workers. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in New York has prosecuted several IFCO managers and employees for criminal offenses associated with the employment of those workers. To date, nine IFCO managers and employees have entered guilty pleas related to such criminal conduct. Four managers are currently pending trial on a felony indictment in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of New York and the investigation of IFCO employees is continuing. The IFCO settlement agreement concerns only the liability of the corporation and does not address any pending or possible future criminal charges against individual employees, ICE noted.

ICE found that several IFCO managers and employees harbored and transported undocumented workers, and encouraged and induced them to remain in the U.S. as pallet workers. An analysis of the payroll information IFCO submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA), and the hiring patterns and practices at IFCO, suggested to ICE that from 2003 through April 2006, as many as 6,000 undocumented workers were employed at IFCO pallet plants.

IFCO received repeated notices from the SSA and others, dating back to at least 2000, of irregularities in the social security numbers used for employment purposes by many of its pallet workers. ICE found that IFCO failed to take significant measures to verify the social security numbers of these workers, and in 2004 and 2005, failed to make any effort to address the use of invalid social security numbers by numerous pallet employees. Investigative entities further concluded that at 30 of IFCO’s pallet plants, the company owed back wages to piece-wage pallet workers, the vast majority of whom were undocumented. Under the settlement agreement, ICE noted, IFCO acknowledged and accepted responsibility for the unlawful conduct of its managers and employees, as described in the agreement. The agreement includes a compliance and reporting program intended to prevent the employment of undocumented workers at IFCO plants in the future. The company will take remedial actions in hiring, such as using the E-Verify online work authorization verification system for all new hires, and will verify the social security numbers of all IFCO employees through SSA.

IFCO also must maintain an employee hotline to receive reports of any suspected violations of law at the company. The agreement runs through the year 2012, at which time, if the company has been in full compliance with all of the agreement’s terms and conditions, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will not seek to prosecute the company for any criminal charges related to the conduct of its employees before April 2006.

“Today’s announcement that IFCO Systems North America will pay the largest settlement amount ever in a worksite enforcement case and the fact that nine IFCO managers have admitted their guilt related to the employment of illegal aliens will send a powerful message that ICE will investigate and bring to justice companies which hire illegal workers,” said John P. Torres, Acting Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for ICE.

Andrew T. Baxter, Acting United States Attorney, stated, “This settlement accomplishes the government’s objective of deterring employers who might seek to subvert the immigration laws of this country. The Agreement severely punishes IFCO for its serious immigration and employment violations; but it also allows the corporation to continue its operations, so that its lawful employees and innocent shareholders do not suffer the consequences of a business failure in this economy. It is our hope that the compliance and reporting requirements under the agreement will serve as a model for other businesses.”

ICE’s announcement is at http://www.ice.gov/pi/nr/0812/081219albany.htm.

Back to Top


7. DHS Issues Final Rule, Notice on H-2B Temporary Nonagricultural Workers

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has amended its H-2B regulations regarding temporary nonagricultural workers and their U.S. employers. The final rule, effective January 18, 2009, generally removes the requirement for H-2B petitioners to state on petitions the names of prospective H-2B workers who are outside the U.S. The rule also reduces the waiting period from six months to three months for an H-2B worker who has reached his or her maximum three-year period of stay in H-2B nonimmigrant status before such person may seek an extension of nonimmigrant stay, change of status, or readmission to the U.S. in any H or L nonimmigrant status.

The rule also adjusts the definition of “temporary services or labor,” which is generally defined as a period of one year but could be for a specific one-time need of up to three years. The rule also eliminates the DHS’s current practice of adjudicating H-2B petitions where the Secretary of Labor or the Governor of Guam has not granted a temporary labor certification. The rule also prohibits H-2B petitioners from requesting an employment start date on the Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129) that differs from the date of need listed on the approved temporary labor certification. The final rule requires H-2B petitioners to notify the DHS when the H-2B worker fails to report for work, is terminated before completing the work for which he or she was hired, or absconds from the worksite.

The final rule also precludes employers from passing the cost of recruiter fees charged by a petitioner, agent, facilitator, recruiter, or similar employment service to prospective H-2B workers as a condition of an offer of H-2B employment. Under this rule, however, employers and H-2B workers may agree that certain transportation costs and government-imposed fees be borne by H-2B workers, if the passing of such costs to these workers is not prohibited under the Fair Labor Standards Act or any other statute.

Moreover, the rule enforces existing penalties in the case of an employer who fails to meet any of the conditions of the H-2B petition, or who willfully misrepresents a material fact in the H-2B petition. Employers who fail to meet the H-2B conditions or who willfully make material misrepresentations on an H-2B petition may be precluded from approval for a period of up to five years of any H (except H-1B1), L, O, or P-1 nonimmigrant visa petition, or any immigrant visa petition described in section 204 of the INA.

Nationals from the following countries are eligible to participate in the H-2B visa program:

Argentina; Australia; Belize; Brazil; Bulgaria; Canada; Chile; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic; El Salvador; Guatemala; Honduras; Indonesia; Israel; Jamaica; Japan; Mexico; Moldova; New Zealand; Peru; Philippines; Poland; Romania; South Africa; South Korea; Turkey; Ukraine; and United Kingdom.

This rule also provides that DHS will publish a notice in the Federal Register listing the countries that the Departments of Homeland Security and State have designated as eligible for their nationals to participate in the H-2B program.

Finally, this rule establishes a pilot exit control program for certain H-2B workers, by requiring them to report their departures at designated ports of entry. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published a notice in the Federal Register describing the procedures and requirements for participation in this pilot program at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-29787.pdf.

The DHS also published a separate notice, effective January 18, 2009, announcing the manner in which H-2B petitioners must notify U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services regarding their employment of nonagricultural workers in H-2B nonimmigrant status or job placement fee information. Among other things, the notice sets forth the procedures for H-2B petitioners to notify USCIS when:

  • an H-2B worker fails to report to work within five work days of the employment start date on the H-2B petition;
  • when the temporary labor or services for which H-2B workers were hired is completed more than 30 days early; or
  • when the H-2B worker absconds from the worksite or is terminated before the completion of the temporary labor or services for which he or she was hired.

Regulations require H-2B petitioners to retain evidence of such notification sent to USCIS for a one-year period.

The notice further provides the procedures for H-2B petitioners to notify USCIS, after an H-2B petition has been filed, within two work days of learning that an H-2B worker paid a fee or other compensation to a facilitator, recruiter, or similar employment service as a condition of the offer of obtaining the H-2B employment.

The text of the final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-30094.htm. The notice is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-30098.htm. Another notice announcing the list of eligible H-2B countries is at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-30114.htm.

Back to Top


8. DHS Issues H-2A Final Rule

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has amended its H-2A regulations regarding temporary and seasonal agricultural workers and their U.S. employers. The final rule, effective January 17, 2009, lengthens the amount of time an agricultural worker may remain in the U.S. after his or her employment has ended and shortens the time period that an agricultural worker whose H-2A nonimmigrant status has expired must wait before he or she is eligible for H-2A nonimmigrant status again.

The rule also provides temporary employment authorization for agricultural workers seeking an extension of their H-2A nonimmigrant status through a different U.S. employer, provided that the employer is a registered user in good standing with the E-Verify employment eligibility verification program.

In addition, the rule modifies the current notification and payment requirements for employers when a worker fails to show up at the start of the employment period, an H-2A employee’s employment is terminated, or an H-2A employee absconds from the worksite. The rule also requires certain employer attestations and precludes the imposition of fees by employers or recruiters on prospective beneficiaries.

Under the final rule, the DHS also will revoke an H-2A petition if the Department of Labor revokes the petitioner’s underlying labor certification.

Finally, the rule establishes criteria for a pilot program under which workers admitted on certain temporary worker visas at a port of entry participating in the program must also depart through a port of entry participating in the program and present designated biographical information upon departure. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will publish a notice designating which temporary workers must participate in the program, which ports of entry are participating in the program, and the types of information that CBP will collect from the departing workers.

Nationals from the following countries are eligible to participate in the H-2A visa program: Argentina; Australia; Belize; Brazil; Bulgaria; Canada; Chile; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic; El Salvador; Guatemala; Honduras; Indonesia; Israel; Jamaica; Japan; Mexico; Moldova; New Zealand; Peru; Philippines; Poland; Romania; South Africa; South Korea; Turkey; Ukraine; and United Kingdom.

The DHS also published a notice, effective January 17, 2009, announcing the manner in which petitioners must notify U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services regarding their employment of agricultural workers in H-2A nonimmigrant status or job placement fee information. Among other things, the regulations require H-2A petitioners to provide notification to DHS within two work days in the following instances:

  • when an H-2A worker fails to report to work within five work days of the employment start date on the H-2A petition or within five work days of the start date established by the petitioner, whichever is later;
  • when the agricultural labor or services for which H-2A workers were hired is completed more than 30 days early; or
  • when the H-2A worker absconds from the worksite or is terminated before the completion of agricultural labor or services for which he or she was hired.

The regulations also require H-2A petitioners to retain evidence of the notification filed with DHS for a one-year period beginning from the date of the notification. Petitioners who use a different employment start date than that stated on the H-2A petition must retain evidence of the changed start date and make such evidence available for inspection by DHS officers for a one-year period beginning on the newly established employment start date.

The final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29888.htm. The notice is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29786.htm. The list of eligible H-2A countries is at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-29785.htm.

Back to Top


9. USCIS Announces New Mailing Address Format for National Capital Region Offices

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on December 3, 2008, a new address format for offices within the National Capital Region (NCR), affecting all USCIS headquarters offices, the Arlington Asylum Office, and the Washington District Office.

To ensure the timely delivery of USCIS mail, correspondence addressed to the affected offices should list a unique mailstop and corresponding ZIP code + 4 number. If the address does not list a mailstop and corresponding ZIP code + 4 number, the correspondence will still be delivered but may be subject to minor delays as a result of the new mail process.

The new format for the address of the Information and Customer Service Division, which handles all general inquiries, is:

Information and Customer Service Division MS 2260
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
111 Massachusetts Ave. N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20529-2260

This address format change does not apply to USCIS offices outside the National Capital Region (such as the Baltimore District). It also currently does not apply to the Alexandria Application Support Center.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/update_addresschange_3dec2008.pdf. The list of the unique mailstop and corresponding ZIP code + 4 number for each affected office is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/external_mailstop_plus_four_chart_3dec08.pdf.

Back to Top


10. ABIL GLOBAL

German business visas. A new article by Dr. Gunther Mävers (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mavers.cfm), “What One Should Know With Regard to a German Business Visa,” has been posted to the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers’ Web site. Dr. Mävers notes that employees of internationally operating companies often use a visitor’s visa for business trips to Germany without being aware of which activities are actually permitted under this visa. Even if violations of the legal provisions of residence and work permits are often unnoticed and consequently not punished, Dr. Mävers says, there are considerable consequences for all persons concerned if violations are detected. The article, which provides information about compliance with visa requirements when traveling to Germany on business, is available, along with other articles by ABIL Global members, at http://www.abil.com/global_immigration.cfm.
Back to Top


11. New Publications and Items of Interest

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman reports. USCIS’s Ombudsman released several reports in December:

Observations on the E-Verify Experience in Arizona & Recommended Customer Service Enhancements found that mid-sized and large employers appear relatively satisfied with the speed and accuracy of E-Verify. Smaller employers, however, expressed varying levels of concern with user-friendliness. Also, the report found that confusion remains about the exact timing and the specific processes that employers and employees must follow after E-Verify returns a Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) determination. Apart from these operational observations, the Ombudsman found that USCIS outreach and education efforts have been well received by system users, but may not be reaching smaller-sized employers that represent 50 percent of the existing private U.S. payroll. The Ombudsman recommends that USCIS:

  1. Simplify the language used in all E-Verify instructions and supporting documentation.
  2. Make all registration and operational documents publicly available online for review by prospective E-Verify end users and employees.
  3. Ensure that USCIS’s education and outreach efforts reach small business communities.
  4. Develop and add a tickler/calendar system in E-Verify that can issue timely prompts to employers to advise them of their next appropriate course of action for each specific open and unresolved TNC.
  5. Announce as a stated goal an intention to replace the current Form I-9 employment authorization verification process for employers that voluntarily use E-Verify.

The E-Verify report is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb_everify_recommendation_2008-12-22.pdf.

Study and Recommendations on Naturalization Oath Ceremonies recommends, among other things, that USCIS should provide new citizens information on how to contact the Social Security Administration to prevent employment eligibility verification problems, given the increased utilization of E-Verify. The naturalization report is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb_naturalization_recommendation_2008-12-16.pdf.

Improving the Processing of “Schedule A” Nurse Visas recommends that USCIS adjust its normal procedures for processing Schedule A nurse applications. Specifically, USCIS should separate and prioritize, as well as centralize, its process for these applications in accordance with Congress’s expressed concern about the national nursing shortage and to ensure consistent adjudication of applications. In addition, the Ombudsman suggested that USCIS may wish to consider establishing points of contact with the Department of Labor (DOL) on the processing of Schedule A nurse applications as partners hoping to achieve the same goal: the expeditious processing of Schedule A nurse applications.

The Ombudsman recommends that USCIS (1) separate and prioritize Schedule A green card nurse applications so that they can be expedited, without the requirement of a written request, upon immigrant visa availability; and (2) centralize Schedule A nurse applications at one designated USCIS service center to facilitate more efficient and consistent processing of Schedule A applications.

Additionally, the Ombudsman suggests that USCIS regularly communicate with DOL and develop points of contact at DOL to discuss concerns and direct inquiries regarding the processing of nurse immigration applications.

The nurse report is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb_ead_recommendation_36.pdf.

USCIS Ombudsman questions and answers from teleconferences. The Ombudsman’s office has made available notes on the following topics from its teleconferences:

  • How is USCIS Working for You?
  • USCIS Refunds: How Is the Process Working for You?
  • The K3 Visa Family Unification Process: How Is It Working for You?
  • N-648 Medical Waivers – How Are They Working For You?
  • Questions and Answers on The New Naturalization Test
  • USCIS Receipting Delay – How Does This Affect You?
  • Temporary Worker Visas
  • E-Verify in Arizona – How is it Working for Your Business?
  • Visas for Nurses: How Does This Impact Your Medical Facility?
  • USCIS Summer 2007 Application Surge: How Is It Affecting You Now?
  • CIS Ombudsman’s 2008 Annual Report: Your Questions and Comments
  • U Visa: One Year After the Interim Final Rule
  • Teleconference on Biological Relationship Testing: Opportunities and Challenges

The links to notes from these teleconferences are available at http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/gc_1171038701035.shtm (scroll down).

Back to Top


12. Recent News from ABIL Members

In an article published on December 16, 2008, in California Executive, “Stimulating the U.S. Economy Through Immigration Reform,” Angelo Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm), managing partner of Paparelli & Partners LLP, said that approximately 500,000 allocated family- and employment-based visas are lost each year “either because of paperwork delays, security clearances or ineptitude.” Mr. Paparelli also predicted an increase in the need for foreign workers as the new administration embarks on an economic improvement plan. “I would say that Obama has been blessed with an ability to act on his agenda very quickly, because of the exigent economic realities. It appears that there will be money for large infrastructure projects; I believe he has fallen into a huge opportunity.”

John Nahajzer (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-nahajzer.cfm), of Maggio & Kattar, P.C., was quoted in “Obama Could Raise Cap On H-1B Skilled Workers,” which was published on November 24, 2008, in Law360, The Newswire for Business Lawyers (http://www.law360.com/). An article by Mr. Nahajzer on electronic I-9 employment authorization verification will appear in Workforce Management (http://www.workforce.com/index.html) in January 2009. Mr. Nahajzer will be speaking at the American Health Lawyers Association’s conference, “Legal Issues Affecting Academic Medical Centers and Other Teaching Institutions,” to be held January 29-30, 2009, at the Ritz-Carlton in Washington, D.C. For details, see http://www.sonnenschein.com/docs/docs_healthcare/AMC09_brochure.pdf.

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers speakers at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s (AILA) New York Chapter annual immigration law symposium, held at the New York Marriott Marquis on December 3, 2008, included Mr. Paparelli, Cyrus Mehta (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm), Charles Kuck (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm), and Bernard Wolfsdorf (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-wolfsdorf.cfm).

Mr. Mehta was on an AILA Web seminar panel on “Equivalency Degree Issues for Advanced Practitioners,” held on December 11, 2008.

Mr. Mehta and Poorvi Chothani (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-chothani.cfm), both ABIL Global members, will speak in Pune, India, on January 2, 2009, in a program sponsored by the Indo-American Chamber of Commerce. Topics include immigration to the U.S. pre- and post-Obama, and employing foreign nationals in India.

Back to Top


13. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm

Department of State Visa Bulletin: http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2009-01-01 00:00:102019-09-18 02:14:33News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 5, No. 1 • January 01, 2009

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 12 • December 02, 2008

December 02, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. E-Verify Deadline Approaches for Federal Contractors – Federal contractors and subcontractors will be required to begin using the E-Verify online work authorization verification system starting January 15, 2009.

2. Canada Fast-Tracks Skilled Workers – Applicants who are not eligible for the federal skilled worker category may qualify under another category.

3. USCIS Revises Religious Worker Regulations – The final rule requires that employers submit a formal petition for temporary religious workers.

4. DHS Adds Countries to Visa Waiver Program; CBP Requires Travel Authorization – Countries added include the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, the Republic of Korea, and the Slovak Republic.

5. TPS Re-Registration Period Extended for Nicaraguans, Hondurans – The re-registration period is extended through December 30, 2008.

6. Guestworkers To Recover Wages – Unreimbursed expenses incurred by guestworkers for a large forestry contractor may be recovered, a judge has found.

7. CDC Expands Scope of Medical Exam – The CDC has changed the scope of the medical examination for certain persons wishing to enter the U.S.

8. Student and Exchange Visitor Program Office Moves – Until direct mail service is established, SEVP recommends that all correspondence be mailed to an office in Washington, D.C.

9. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

10. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members

11. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. E-Verify Deadline Approaches for Federal Contractors

Federal contractors and subcontractors will be required to begin using U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) E-Verify system starting January 15, 2009, to verify their employees’ eligibility to work legally in the United States. In a final rule, the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council amended the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to reflect this change.

The new rule implements Executive Order 12989, as amended by President George W. Bush on June 6, 2008, directing federal agencies to require that federal contractors agree to electronically verify the employment eligibility of their employees. The amended Executive Order reinforces the policy, first announced in 1996, that the federal government does business only with companies that have a workforce that is authorized to work in the U.S. This new rule requires federal contractors to agree, through language inserted into their federal contracts, to use E-Verify to confirm the employment eligibility of all persons hired during a contract term, and to confirm the employment eligibility of federal contractors’ current employees who perform contract services for the federal government within the U.S.

Federal contracts awarded and solicitations issued after January 15, 2009, will include a clause committing government contractors to use E-Verify. The same clause will also be required in subcontracts over $3,000 for services or construction. Contracts exempt from this rule include those that are for less than $100,000 and those that are for commercially available off-the-shelf items. Companies awarded a contract with the federal government will be required to enroll in E-Verify within 30 days of the contract award date. They also will need to begin using the E-Verify system to confirm that all of their new hires and their employees directly working on federal contracts are authorized to work in the U.S.

The final rule reflects some changes from the proposed rule. The changes are intended to lighten the burden on small businesses that decide to accept federal contracts, and to provide contractors with flexible means of complying with the basic requirement that all persons working on federal contracts be electronically verified.

More than 92,000 employers currently use E-Verify, an Internet-based system operated by the DHS in partnership with the Social Security Administration that allows participating employers to verify the employment eligibility of their employees electronically. During fiscal year 2008, more than 6.6 million employment verification queries were run through the system, representing one out of every eight people hired in the U.S. Approximately 96.1 percent of all cases queried through E-Verify are found to be employment-authorized, and individuals who are not immediately cleared are given the opportunity to correct their records, USCIS said.

The final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-26904.pdf. A related USCIS announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/FAR_13Nov08.pdf. A USCIS “frequently asked questions” sheet is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/FAR_FAQ_13nov08.pdf.

Back to Top


2. Canada Fast-Tracks Skilled Workers

Jason Kenney, Canada’s Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism, announced on November 28, 2008, that retroactive to February 27, 2008, the “Action Plan for Faster Immigration” includes issuing instructions to visa officers reviewing new federal skilled worker applications to process those from candidates who:

  • include an offer of arranged employment; or
  • are from a foreign national living legally in Canada for one year as a temporary foreign worker or international student; or
  • are from a skilled worker who has at least one year of experience under one or more of the 38 occupations listed at http://www.cic.gc.ca/eligible.

The list of 38 occupations was developed after consultations with the provinces and territories, business, labor, and other stakeholders. New federal skilled worker applications that do not meet the eligibility criteria outlined above will not be processed, and the application fee will be refunded. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) said in a statement that this effort, along with funds set aside in the 2008 budget to improve the immigration system, “will stop the backlog from growing and will start to draw it down.”

“The eligibility criteria apply only to new federal skilled worker applicants and will not affect Canada’s family reunification or refugee protection goals,” Minister Kenney said. He noted that applicants who are not eligible for the federal skilled worker category may qualify under another category, such as the Provincial Nominee Program, or as temporary foreign workers, which could then put them on a path to permanent residence through the new Canadian Experience Class.

“We expect new federal skilled worker applicants, including those with arranged employment, to receive a decision within six to 12 months compared with up to six years under the old system,” said Minister Kenney. “All other economic class applications—including applicants chosen by Quebec, provincial nominees, the Canadian Experience Class, and live-in caregivers—will continue to be given priority.”

All applications made before February 27, 2008, will be processed according to the rules that were in effect at that time.

CIC said that these changes “bring Canada in line with two of its main competitors for highly skilled labor: Australia and New Zealand. Both of these countries have eliminated their backlogs and have systems that deliver final decisions for economic applicants within a year.”

Canada plans to admit between 240,000 and 265,000 new permanent residents in 2009, Minister Kenney said, noting that the planned numbers are on par with last year and are among the highest for Canada during the past 15 years. The 2009 plan includes up to 156,600 immigrants in the economic category; 71,000 in the family category; and 37,400 in the humanitarian category.

Minister Kenney noted that “[t]he recent steps this Government has taken to improve our immigration system will help ensure that Canada remains competitive internationally and responsive to labour market needs domestically.” Critics, however, expressed concerns that the new emphasis on skilled workers would create two classes of immigrants and that less-skilled workers would be at a disadvantage, and that doubling the number of temporary workers would depress wages. “It’s bad for the Canadian economy and it’s bad for [the temporary workers], because they cannot bring in their families and often are open to exploitation and abuse,” said New Democrat Olivia Chow.

CIC has expanded its web site. The site now includes a section for employers (http://www.cic.gc.ca/employers) and a new interactive tool (http://www.cic.gc.ca/cometocanada) that matches information provided by potential applicants with immigration programs.

The ministerial instructions are available at http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/backgrounders/2008/2008-11-28a.asp. A notice announcing the instructions is available at http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/backgrounders/2008/2008-11-28.asp. For more information on the new initiatives, see http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/releases/2008/2008-11-28.asp.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Revises Religious Worker Regulations

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has revised significantly the special immigrant and nonimmigrant (R-1) religious worker visa classification regulations. USCIS said the final rule “will ensure the integrity of the religious worker program by establishing a requirement that employers submit a formal petition for temporary religious workers, and by providing for increased inspections, evaluations, verifications, and compliance reviews of religious organizations.” The rule “also fulfills the recent Congressional mandate to issue final regulations to eliminate or reduce fraud in the religious worker program.”

Previously, foreign religious workers were able to request an R-1 religious worker visa at a consular post without any previous stateside review of the religious organization or job offer. The final rule will require individuals seeking to enter the U.S. through the nonimmigrant religious worker program to provide a consular officer an approved Form I-129, Petition for Alien Worker. Stateside review of the petition will allow USCIS to verify that the petitioner and the job offer are legitimate before the State Department issues a visa and admits the religious worker to the U.S.

Among other things, the rule also reduces the initial period of admission for a nonimmigrant from three years to a period of up to 30 months. USCIS said this will allow it an earlier opportunity to review whether the terms of the visa have been met before extending the nonimmigrant religious worker’s stay in the U.S. Religious workers will be allowed one extension of up to an additional 30 months.

The final rule was published in the Federal Register on November 26, 2008, and was effective the same day. The full text of the final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-28225.pdf. A questions-and-answers sheet is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/religious_work_faq_21nov08.pdf. A related fact sheet is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/religious_worker_factsheet_21nov08.pdf. A policy memorandum on handling non-minister special immigrant religious worker petitions affected by the October 1, 2008, sunset date is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/SpecialImmigrantRWPetitionsOct1sunset91908.pdf.

Back to Top


4. DHS Adds Countries to Visa Waiver Program; CBP Requires Travel Authorization

Effective November 17, 2008, the Department of Homeland Security has added the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, the Republic of Korea, and the Slovak Republic to the list of countries authorized to participate in the Visa Waiver Program (VWP).

Citizens and eligible nationals of VWP countries may apply for admission at a U.S. port of entry as nonimmigrants for up to 90 days for business or pleasure without obtaining a nonimmigrant visa, provided that they are otherwise eligible for admission under applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. The designated countries in the VWP include Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brunei, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, San Marino, Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (defined for VWP purposes as England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man).

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also announced on November 13, 2008, that beginning January 12, 2009, all VWP nonimmigrants traveling to the U.S. must obtain an approved travel authorization from the Department’s Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA). To comply with ESTA, VWP travelers must provide electronically to CBP the information currently collected on the I-94W Nonimmigrant Alien Arrival/Departure (Form I-94W) through the CBP ESTA Web site and receive authorization to travel before embarking on travel to the U.S. The ESTA Web site is at https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/esta/esta.html?_flowExecutionKey=_cD88DB6CB-CF0E-B36E-3AE3-4C453B4C386E_k613ED908-DCC2-7541-9CDA-5DB7BB3E0773.

The final rule adding the VWP countries is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-27062.pdf. The CBP notice about obtaining travel authorization is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-26997.pdf.

Back to Top


5. TPS Re-Registration Period Extended for Nicaraguans, Hondurans

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced an extension to the re-registration period for nationals of Nicaragua and Honduras who have been granted temporary protected status (TPS) and are now eligible to re-register and maintain their status an additional 18 months. Initially, the 60-day re-registration period for nationals of Honduras and Nicaragua began October 1, 2008, and ended on December 1, 2008. The re-registration period is being extended through December 30, 2008, because of tropical storm activity in the region.

Additionally, USCIS has automatically extended the validity of employment authorization documents (EADs) for eligible Honduran and Nicaraguan TPS beneficiaries for 6 months, through July 5, 2009. USCIS said this is intended to allow sufficient time for eligible TPS beneficiaries to re-register and receive an EAD without any lapse in employment authorization.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced in October 2008 that the TPS designations of Honduras and Nicaragua were extended through July 5, 2010. The extension will make those who have already been granted TPS eligible to re-register and maintain their status for an additional 18 months.

Nicaraguan and Honduran TPS beneficiaries are strongly encouraged to apply as soon as possible within the registration period that now ends December 30, 2008.

There are approximately 3,500 nationals of Nicaragua and 70,000 nationals of Honduras (and people having no nationality who last habitually resided in Honduras and Nicaragua) eligible for TPS re-registration. TPS does not apply to Nicaraguan or Honduran nationals who entered the U.S. after Dec. 30, 1998.

TPS beneficiaries must submit an Application for Temporary Protected Status, Form I-821, without the application fee and the Application for Employment Authorization, Form I-765, to re-register for TPS. A separate biometric service fee, or a fee waiver request, must be submitted by re-registrants 14-years of age and older. If the applicant is only seeking to re-register for TPS and is not seeking an extension of employment authorization, he or she must submit the I-765 for data-gathering purposes only and is not required to submit the I-765 filing fee. All applicants seeking an extension of employment authorization through July 5, 2010, must submit the required application filing fee with the I-765 or a fee waiver request with proper documentation.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/tps_nicaragua_honduras_extend_21nov08).pdf. USCIS published a related notice in the Federal Register on November 24, 2008, available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-27702.pdf (Honduras) and http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-27703.pdf(Nicaragua).

Back to Top


6. Guestworkers To Recover Wages

In a class action lawsuit, U.S. District Court Judge Clarence Cooper found that unreimbursed expenses incurred by guestworkers for a large forestry contractor, Eller and Sons Trees, Inc., of Franklin, Georgia, may be recovered and that actual damages sought by the workers may exceed $500,000. The employer had sought to cap the damages.

The named plaintiffs are three migrant farmworkers. Eller and Sons Trees provides forest reforestation (tree planting) and forestry services such as brush clearing, boundary marking, and chemical spraying. Most of its employees are engaged in tree planting, predominantly in the southern U.S. during the months of December, January, and February. Eller and Sons Trees cannot find enough employees in the U.S. to perform the work, the decision noted. As a result, most of the workers come from outside the U.S., with the vast majority coming from Guatemala, and others coming from Mexico, Honduras, and Colombia. Eller and Sons Trees obtains temporary seasonal employees through the H-2B visa program.

The guestworkers were represented by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and the Legal Aid Justice Center of Virginia is serving as co-counsel. The SPLC said it now must prove how much money is owed to the workers. “This is a great victory for these forestry workers,” said Mary Bauer, director of the SPLC’s Immigrant Justice Project. “For too long this industry has seen guestworkers as a disposable workforce to be used, abused and thrown away. This decision is a signal that those days are coming to an end.”

According to the SPLC, the court also found that the representations an employer makes to the government on H-2B visa applications, such as the total number of hours the employees will work per week, can be enforced by the workers even if they are unaware of what the employer reported to the government. This finding would hold an employer liable for a 40-hour work week promised on its application to federal government, even if the employer never made such an agreement with its workers, the SPLC noted. The judge in this case found that an employer cannot drive a worker’s pay below the minimum wage rate by deducting expenses for things that primarily benefit the employer. The court also found that the prevailing wage rate for the area, rather than the lower minimum wage rate, is protected from such deductions under this principle. The SPLC said that this is the first time such a decision has been reached in a contested case.

The judge found that the costs of passports, visas, and other travel costs not only drove the workers’ pay below the protected rate level but resulted in workers having “negative incomes” in their first week of work. The judge awarded $53,890 to the case’s plaintiffs for expenses that were not reimbursed during their first work week, citing the Fair Labor Standards Act. The SPLC believes that damages for the rest of the class, which the organization expects number into the thousands of workers, may reach into the millions of dollars.

The case records for Escolastico de Leon-Granados et al. v. Eller and Sons Trees, Inc., are available at http://www.splcenter.org/legal/docket/files.jsp?cdrID=49&sortID=4. The SPLC has filed a number of other guestworker lawsuits.

Back to Top


7. CDC Expands Scope of Medical Exam

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published an interim final rule in October 2008 that changed the “definition of a communicable disease of public health significance, the scope of the medical examination for aliens, and the evaluation criteria for tuberculosis,” the Department of State announced. The definition of communicable disease of public health significance continues to include the previous list of eight specific diseases (including HIV infection) and adds two new disease categories: (1) quarantinable diseases designated by Presidential Executive Order, and (2) diseases that meet the criteria of a public health emergency of international concern, which require notification to the World Heath Organization under revised international health regulations. The scope of the medical examination for certain foreign persons wishing to come to the U.S. has been “amended to incorporate a more flexible, risk-based approach based on medical and epidemiologic factors,” the Department noted.

The Department of State’s notice, sent to all diplomatic and consular posts in November 2008, is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_4388.html. Further information from the CDC is available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/ifr_main.htm.

Back to Top


8. Student and Exchange Visitor Program Office Moves

The Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) office has moved. Until direct mail service is established, SEVP recommends that all correspondence be mailed to: Student and Exchange Visitor Program, Attn: (Branch Name), Potomac Center North, 500 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC  20024. The new main telephone number is (703) 603-3400. E-mail addresses have not changed, so inquiries may be sent to SEVP staff through their previous e-mail or through SEVIS.Source@dhs.gov.

For more information on SEVP, see http://www.ice.gov/sevis/index.htm?searchstring=sevp.

Back to Top


9. New Publications and Items of Interest

State legislation on immigration. The “State Responses to Immigration” database contains all bills and resolutions related to immigrants or immigration that were considered by state legislators across the U.S. The database contains all immigration-related legislation for 2007. Data for 2008 and historic 2001-2006 data will be added in the coming months.

The searchable database is classified by state, region, subject area, legislative type, and bill status. The database allows users to find out, for example, the status of enforcement initiatives introduced in their state, compare the number of bills regulating employment, or evaluate the passage rate of certain bills across the nation. The database assigns a bill’s status based on its status as of December 31 of the given year.

The database notes that in 2007, 1,059 immigration-related state bills and resolutions were introduced in state legislatures nationwide, of which only 167 (or 16 percent) were enacted into law. The vast majority of bills proposed in 2007 either expired (33 percent) or remained pending (45 percent) without any legislative resolution. The report is available at http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/2007methodology.pdf.

State Responses to Immigration (http://www.migrationinformation.org/datahub/statelaws_home.cfm) is a joint project of the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) and a research team at the New York University School of Law (NYU).

The Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy has published “Estimating the Contribution of Immigrant Business Owners to the U.S. Economy.” Among other things, the report finds that:

  • The total business income generated by immigrant business owners is $67 billion, representing 11.6 percent of all business income in the U.S.
  • Immigrants are nearly 30 percent more likely to start a business than are nonimmigrants, and they represent 16.7 percent of all new business owners in the United States
  • Immigrant business owners make significant contributions to business income, generating $67 billion of the $577 billion in U.S. business income, as estimated from 2000 U.S. Census data. They generate nearly one-quarter of all business income in California—nearly $20 billion—and nearly one-fifth of business income in New York, Florida, and New Jersey.
  • Immigrant business ownership is geographically concentrated in a few states. Nearly 30 percent of all business owners in California are immigrants, compared with about 12.5 percent of the population of U.S. business owners.
  • Immigrants own 11.2 percent of businesses with $100,000 or more in sales and 10.8 percent of businesses with employees.
  • Immigrants’ contributions differ across sectors of the economy. They own a large share—more than one-fifth—of businesses in the arts, entertainment, and recreation industry. They also contribute significantly to other services, transportation, and wholesale and retail trade.
  • Although business owners from Mexico constitute the largest share of immigrant business owners, total immigrant business ownership, formation, and income originate with immigrant business owners from around the world.

The report is available at http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/rs334tot.pdf.

The Department of Labor’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification released a fact sheet in October 2008 that offers selected statistics and highlights of PERM processing in fiscal year 2008. See http://www.globallawcenters.com/pdfs/27006.pdf.

Back to Top


10. Recent News from ABIL Members

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) moderated an immigration discussion at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. Hosted by Cornell Law School on November 19, 2008, the panel discussed immigration policy in an Obama administration, including how the new Congress and new administration will affect immigration policy in the U.S. Speakers included Doris Meissner, former Immigration and Naturalization Service Commissioner; Frank Sharry, former Executive Director of the National Immigration Forum; and Jeanne Butterfield, Executive Director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
Back to Top


11. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm

Department of State Visa Bulletin: http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-12-02 00:00:242019-09-18 02:19:13News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 12 • December 02, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 11 • November 06, 2008

November 06, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. USCIS Estimates 21 Percent of H-1B Cases Involve Fraud or Technical Violations – USCIS concluded that there is a 21 percent baseline fraud and technical violation rate for H-1B petitions and plans procedural changes as a result.

2. U.S. Increases Period of Stay for Trade-NAFTA Professionals From Canada and Mexico – The final rule changes the initial period of admission for TN workers from one to three years.

3. Seven Countries To Be Added to Visa Waiver Program – The Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, and South Korea will be added soon.

4. USCIS Withdraws Lockbox for Naturalization Applications – USCIS has decided to delay implementation of the lockbox while technical issues are resolved.

5. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Foreign Health Care Worker Certifications – The rule, adopted without change, requires certain health care workers seeking admission to the U.S., excluding physicians, to present certificates establishing competency in a specific health care field.

6. Department of State Requests Proposals for International Visitor Program – A cooperative agreement for $195,000 is expected to be awarded in early 2009.

7. Department of Homeland Security Streamlines Process for Short-Term Visitors Infected With HIV – DHS will allow those who are HIV-positive to enter as visitors for a temporary period not to exceed 30 days, without being required to seek such admission under the current case-by-case process.

8. State Dept. Eliminates Board of Appellate Review – Determinations related to loss of citizenship and passport denials now are being made by the Bureau of Consular Affairs instead.

9. DHS Exempts Certain Systems From Privacy Act Requirements, Including Legal Records, SEVIS – DHS is claiming exemption from certain requirements of the Privacy Act for various systems.

10. Slow Forward Movement Predicted for Employment Categories – Slow forward movement is expected in the cut-off dates for most employment visa categories during the next few months, and retrogressions cannot be ruled out.

11. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

12. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members

13. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. USCIS Estimates 21 Percent of H-1B Cases Involve Fraud or Technical Violations

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) Office of Fraud Detection and National Security, a division of the National Security and Records Verification Directorate, collaborated with other USCIS components on a new report, “H-1B Benefit Fraud & Compliance Assessment,” released in September 2008. The report estimates that about one in every five H-1B cases involves either fraud or a technical violation.

There were a total of 51 cases within the sample of 246 H-1B petitions that USCIS said represented either fraud, a technical violation, or multiple technical violations. USCIS said the cases reviewed constituted “a statistically valid random sampling of pending and completed cases over a recent six-month period.” The agency noted that “not all violations will rise to the level that would warrant a criminal investigation or prosecution,” and that the “vulnerabilities and abuses” identified “need not lead to a criminal investigation and/or prosecution in order to be reported for [Benefit Fraud and Compliance Assessment] purposes since systemic vulnerabilities ultimately may contribute to higher rates of successful fraudulent filings.” USCIS used the “overall violation rate” of 20.7 percent to extrapolate an estimate of approximately 20,000 petitions nationwide that “may have some type of fraud or technical violation(s).”

USCIS also identified “primary fraud or technical violation indicators,” including:

  1. Firms with 25 or fewer employees have higher rates of fraud or technical violation(s) than larger-sized companies.
  2. Firms with an annual gross income of less than $10 million have higher rates of fraud or technical violations than firms with an annual gross income greater than $10 million.
  3. Firms in existence less than 10 years have higher incidences of fraud or technical violations than firms with an annual gross income greater than $10 million.
  4. The results indicate that H-1B petitions filed for accounting, human resources, business analysts, sales, and advertising occupations are more likely to contain fraud or technical violations than other occupational categories.
  5. Beneficiaries with only bachelor’s degrees had higher fraud or technical violation rates than did those with graduate degrees.

USCIS concluded that the results of this study “have established a 21% baseline fraud and technical violation(s) rate for H-1B petitions. Given the significant vulnerability, USCIS is making procedural changes, which will be described in a forthcoming document.”

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers expressed concerns about the small sample size (0.2 percent of the 96,827 H-1B petitions filed between October 1, 2005, and March 31, 2006) and the fact that over 80 percent of the violations found by the USCIS involved Department of Labor regulations outside of USCIS’s mission of adjudicating requests for immigration benefits.

The USCIS report is available at http://www.ieeeusa.org/policy/reports/DHSH1BFraudRpt.pdf.

Back to Top


2. U.S. Increases Period of Stay for Trade-NAFTA Professionals From Canada and Mexico

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has increased the maximum period of time a Trade-NAFTA (TN) professional worker from Canada or Mexico may remain in the U.S. before seeking readmission or obtaining an extension of stay. The final rule changes the initial period of admission for TN workers from one to three years, making it equal to the initial period of admission for H-1B professional workers.

Eligible TN nonimmigrants now may receive extensions of stay in increments of up to three years instead of the previous maximum period of stay of one year. Spouses and unmarried minor children of TN nonimmigrants in their corresponding nonimmigrant classifications will also benefit from the new regulation.

The TN nonimmigrant visa classification is available to eligible Mexicans and Canadians with at least a bachelor’s degree or appropriate professional credentials who work in certain qualified fields pursuant to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Qualified professions identified within NAFTA include, but are not limited to, accountants, engineers, attorneys, pharmacists, scientists, and teachers.

The final rule, effective October 16, 2008, is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24600.pdf. The announcement, issued on October 14, 2008, is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/tn_nonimmigrant_changes_update.pdf.

Back to Top


3. Seven Countries To Be Added to Visa Waiver Program

The Bush administration announced on October 17, 2008, that it plans to add seven countries to the Visa Waiver Program (VWP): the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, and South Korea. President George W. Bush said that eligible citizens of those countries will be able to travel to the U.S. for up to 90 days without a visa “in about a month.” So-called “roadmap” countries, which are on track to qualify for VWP admission, include Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Malta, Poland, and Romania.

The VWP currently allows the citizens of 27 countries to travel to the U.S. for tourism or business without obtaining a visa. Nationals participating in the VWP must travel only for business, pleasure, or transit; stay in the U.S. for 90 days or fewer; and, if arriving by sea or air, hold a valid ticket for return or onward travel and enter the U.S. aboard an air or sea carrier that has been designated as a participant in the VWP.

President Bush’s statement is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/10/20081017-5.html. A fact sheet is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/10/20081017-15.html.

Back to Top


4. USCIS Withdraws Lockbox for Naturalization Applications

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has withdrawn its instruction issued on September 12, 2008, that in certain instances the Application for Naturalization (Form N-400) would be filed at a USCIS lockbox facility rather than at the USCIS Service Center. The notice was to take effect on October 14, 2008. USCIS has decided to delay implementation while technical issues are resolved and has withdrawn as of October 10, 2008, the notice published in September. Applicants should continue to file their N-400s according to the instructions on the form.

The new notice is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24095.pdf.

Back to Top


5. State Dept. Issues Final Rule on Foreign Health Care Worker Certifications

The Department of State (DOS) issued a final rule effective October 20, 2008, that adopts as final without change the Department’s interim rule published at 67 Fed. Reg. 77158 (Dec. 17, 2002). The rule requires certain health care workers seeking admission to the U.S., excluding physicians, to present certificates establishing competency in a specific health care field. This certification is issued by the Commission on Graduates of Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS) or other credentialing organizations that have been approved by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in consultation with the Department of Health and Human Services. DOS said this rule facilitates greater uniformity between the regulations of DHS and the Department of State.

The final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24474.pdf. The interim rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2002/pdf/02-31603.pdf.

Back to Top


6. Department of State Requests Proposals for International Visitor Program

The Community Relations Branch of the Department of State’s Office of International Visitors, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, issued a request for grant proposals (RFP) on October 9, 2008, on the design and implementation of an airport arrival and departure program at New York’s John F. Kennedy (JFK) International Airport and New Jersey’s Newark International Airport.

A cooperative agreement for $195,000 is expected to be awarded in early 2009, pending availability of fiscal year 2009 funds. The 18-month award will begin on or about January 1, 2009, and end on September 30, 2010.

Proposed funding would support the following activities: Meet incoming International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP) participants at JFK International Airport and assist them to their connecting flights; meet incoming IVLP participants at Newark International Airport and assist them to their connecting flights; provide assistance to outgoing IVLP participants, through U.S. Customs at JFK International Airport and Newark International Airport; and liaise with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Transportation Security Administration officials, and Port Authority officials at both airports.

The RFP is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24020.pdf.

Back to Top


7. Department of Homeland Security Streamlines Process for Short-Term Visitors Infected With HIV

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule effective October 6, 2008, to provide, on a “limited and categorical” basis, a more streamlined process for nonimmigrants infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who wish to visit the U.S. on a short-term basis. Under the final rule, DHS will allow those who are HIV-positive to enter as visitors (for business or pleasure) for a temporary period not to exceed 30 days, without being required to seek such admission under the more complex (individualized, case-by-case) process provided under current DHS procedures. Additionally, DHS has decided to permit an additional “period or periods of satisfactory departure in exigent circumstances” under a provision modeled after the Visa Waiver Program.

Nonimmigrants who do not meet the specific requirements of the rule or who do not wish to consent to the conditions imposed by the final rule may seek admission under current procedures and obtain a case-by-case determination of their eligibility for a waiver of the nonimmigrant visa requirements concerning inadmissibility for those infected with HIV.

The final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-23287.pdf.

Back to Top


8. State Dept. Eliminates Board of Appellate Review

The Department of State (DOS) issued a final rule effective October 20, 2008, that eliminates the Department’s Board of Appellate Review (L/BAR), which had been authorized to review certain Department determinations, in particular those related to loss of citizenship and passport denials. Because L/BAR’s jurisdiction has been superseded or made obsolete, and in large part replaced by review of loss of citizenship and passport matters by the Bureau of Consular Affairs, this rule eliminates L/BAR and authorizes on a discretionary basis an “alternative, less cumbersome” review of loss of nationality determinations by the Bureau of Consular Affairs.

The rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24472.pdf.

Back to Top


9. DHS Exempts Certain Systems From Privacy Act Requirements, Including Legal Records, SEVIS

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has published final rules exempting certain systems from some provisions of the Privacy Act because of “criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements.” The systems include the General Counsel Electronic Management System (GEMS). The DHS noted that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) attorneys work closely with investigators throughout the process of adjudicating immigration cases. ICE attorneys “must have access to investigative documents and related materials in order to form their decisions about how to handle particular cases.” Additionally, DHS noted, ICE attorneys create attorney work product associated with immigration proceedings. The GEMS system will facilitate the collection and maintenance of materials used by ICE attorneys in immigration adjudications. “It will supplement and ultimately replace the current attorney work product paper files that are primarily stored and managed in the hardcopy alien file commonly known as the ‘A-file,’ ” DHS noted.

DHS also is claiming exemption from certain requirements of the Privacy Act for the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS). DHS noted that because the purpose of the SEVIS system is to collect and maintain pertinent information on nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors, and the schools and exchange visitor program sponsors that host them while in the U.S., “it is possible that the information in the record system may pertain to national security or law enforcement matters.” Disclosure of related information would therefore present a “serious impediment” to law enforcement and national security efforts, DHS said. Disclosure of the information also would permit an individual who is the subject of a record “to impede the investigation and avoid detection or apprehension, which undermines the entire system.” DHS said this exemption is “a standard law enforcement and national security exemption utilized by numerous law enforcement and intelligence agencies.”

DHS said it is establishing a new agency-wide system of records under the Privacy Act for DHS General Legal Records. This will ensure that all components of DHS follow the same privacy rules for collecting and handling general legal records. DHS is proposing to exempt its general legal records from provisions of the Privacy Act.

The GEMS final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24996.pdf. The SEVIS final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-25000.pdf. The General Legal Records proposed rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-24997.pdf.

Back to Top


10. Slow Forward Movement Predicted for Employment Categories

The Department of State’s Visa Office reported in the November 2008 Visa Bulletin that the level of demand being received from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offices indicates that USCIS has a significant number of cases with priority dates that are earlier than the established cut-offs. This is likely to result in slow forward movement of the cut-off dates for most employment visa categories during the next few months, the Department said. Sudden changes in the USCIS demand patterns could result in fluctuations in the monthly cut-off dates, and retrogressions cannot be ruled out during fiscal year 2009.
Back to Top


11. New Publications and Items of Interest

Customs searches, questioning of travelers. The Asian Law Caucus and the Electronic Frontier Foundation reported that earlier this year, they sued the Department of Homeland Security under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for failing to turn over records on Customs searches and questioning. This summer, they received many of the documents they had sought showing how much Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents’ power to read and copy the personal papers of travelers has increased over the years. The documents also showed that Customs issued a directive (first issued in 2004, revised in 2006) that called for intensive questioning of individuals deemed to be suspected terrorists, which the Asian Law Caucus said may account for the rise in complaints from Muslim Americans and others of invasive searches and interrogations at the U.S. border. The Asian Law Caucus continues to gather reports of invasive searches and questioning to support its advocacy efforts, and has released Tips for Travelers on handling encounters with Customs, including filing complaints and FOIA requests. The tips include travelers returning to the U.S. and immigrants leaving the U.S. See http://www.asianlawcaucus.org/site/alc_dev/section.php?id=99.

USCIS ombudsman issues recommendations on EAD delays. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ombudsman (ombudsman) reported on October 2, 2008, that it has recently received many complaints from foreign nationals who have lost, or are in danger of losing, their jobs in the U.S. because the agency is not issuing Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) within 90 days of application receipt and is not granting interim EADs, as required by regulation. USCIS has posted processing dates over 90 days for EADs at service centers but, the ombudsman found, “has not provided a sufficient explanation on the delays or consistent information on alternative measures that may assist in addressing EAD delays.” In a preliminary response, USCIS informed the ombudsman that it will immediately (1) audit its caseload to determine which cases have been pending for more than 70 days, (2) process service requests at 75 days rather than 90 days, and (3) adjudicate EADs that are outside normal processing times within four hours for customers who appear at local offices.

To address long-term trends in EAD processing, and to maintain confidence in the work authorization system, the ombudsman recommends that USCIS adhere to regulations; provide information on delays expeditiously; provide consistent guidance to the public; and reconsider the ombudsman’s recommendation to issue multi-year EADs. The ombudsman also suggested additional operational procedures.

The report, “Recommendations on USCIS Processing Delays for Employment Authorization Documents,” is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb_ead_recommendation_35.pdf.

The October 2008 issue of the ABIL Immigration Insider included steps the ombudsman recommends people take if their EADs are delayed by 90 days or more.

Back to Top


12. Recent News from ABIL Members

Steve Garfinkel (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-garfinkel.cfm) spoke to the North Carolina College and University Professional Association for Human Resources (NCCUPA-HR) on October 23, 2008, in Concord, North Carolina. Mr. Garfinkel presented an in-depth discussion of the H-1B visa as it relates to colleges and universities, and addressed other nonimmigrant and immigrant visa issues.

Angelo A. Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) has co-authored a new article, “Radioactive Immigration Risks: Real Threats to the New Government,” which was published in the New York Law Journal. The text of the article is available at http://www.nationofimmigrators.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/NYLJ%20article%20on%20benefit%20fraud%20-%20FINAL%20-%20long%20form.doc.

Mr. Paparelli was quoted in the October 17, 2008, issue of the E-Commerce Times regarding the low H-1B cap: “I think that the reality over the last few years has been that when a nation has a visa quota that runs out within the first day or two of being opened, and then all economic growth that should be derived is put in suspended animation for another year — it suggests that something is wrong.” For the full text of the story, see http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/64850.html.

At a conference at the Practising Law Institute (PLI) on October 14, 2008, speakers noted that the inconsistency of laws and practices among states regarding the use of the E-Verify employment authorization verification program has created compliance issues for companies operating in more than one state. Charles Kuck (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) noted that the Department of Homeland Security encourages the passage of state laws requiring the use of E-Verify. “I don’t think it will matter who our next president is; there will still be movement toward making E-Verify mandatory,” Mr. Kuck said.

Bernard Wolfsdorf (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-wolfsdorf.cfm) also spoke on consular and border processing at the PLI conference. Sharon Mehlman (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehlman.cfm) spoke about USCIS issues.

Mr. Paparelli spoke at the PLI conference of concerns about an increase in L-1B visa denials. He noted that USCIS has issued key policy memos over the years that conflict with a nonbinding decision from the agency’s Administrative Appeals Office. Some USCIS officers are using that decision as a basis for L-1B denials, Mr. Paparelli said. He noted that it helps to build an L-1B case to include evidence of “substantial economic inconvenience” to the company if the visa is denied. A USCIS spokesperson said the agency intends to issue guidance on the issue of specialized knowledge in a few months.

H. Ronald Klasko (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm) recently addressed immigration lawyers in Florida on options for wealthy investors and retirees to obtain permanent resident status in the U.S. His presentation was made at the 22nd Annual American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) Central Florida Chapter Immigration Law Seminar. Mr. Klasko addressed the advantages and disadvantages of choosing between E-2 and L-1 visas and individual and regional EB-5 centers.

Mr. Klasko’s firm, Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer, announced four new associates: Neelam Ihsanullah, Alan Seagrave, Jonathan Willmoth, and Kate Kalmykov. The firm has offices in Philadelphia and New York.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) also spoke at the same Florida seminar on EB-5 immigrant investor issues. On October 24, Mr. Yale-Loehr addressed another seminar in Orlando, Florida, on EB-5 issues.

Steve Clark (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-clark.cfm) participated in a panel at the Boston Bar Association Solo and Small Firm Section last month on Immigration Practice Tips for Non-Immigration Experienced Lawyers.

Several ABIL members have blogs, including ABIL President Angelo Paparelli (http://www.nationofimmigrators.com/) and Charles Kuck (http://www.immigration-blog.net/blog1/). Mr. Paparelli commented on the recent H-1B report on both of his blogs, including the one noted above and on Immigration Lawyers on the Web, http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/.

Back to Top


13. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm

Department of State Visa Bulletin: http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html

Back to Top

 

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-11-06 00:00:262019-09-18 02:23:55News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 11 • November 06, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 10 • October 01, 2008

October 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Employment Visa Categories Backlogged – Many employment category cut-off dates have been established for October.

2. DV-2010 Visa Lottery Entry Period Begins – The DV-2010 Lottery online entry period runs from noon EDT on October 2, 2008, to noon EST on December 1, 2008.

3. EAD Delays: What To Do? – The USCIS ombudsman recommended several steps if an EAD is delayed beyond 90 days.

4. SEVIS Fees Increasing October 27, ICE Clarifies Procedures – ICE published a final rule increasing the Student and Exchange Visitor Program school certification petition fees and the application fees for nonimmigrants seeking to become academic or vocational students, or exchange visitors.

5. Congress Extends Four Immigration Programs until March 2009 – Congress has extended four immigration programs that were due to expire this fall.

6. Travel May Be Risky While Adjustment Application Is Pending, Recent Case Shows – Traveling outside the U.S. while an adjustment of status application is pending can be risky, even with advance parole.

7. USCIS Reminds About ‘Flexibilities’ When Travel Is Delayed Unexpectedly – Given recent severe weather in the Caribbean, USCIS issued a reminder about available services and agency “flexibilities.”

8. Naturalization Form Added To Direct Mail Program – The Direct Mail program now includes Form N-400, Application for Naturalization; non-military N-400 applications should be filed with the appropriate Lockbox.

9. Ninth Circuit Upholds Arizona Law Targeting Employers Hiring Undocumented Workers – The law’s principal sanction is the revocation of state licenses to do business in Arizona for employers who hire undocumented workers.

10. USCIS Extends TPS for Nicaraguans, Hondurans, El Salvadorans; Only Updated TPS Forms Will Be Accepted – The extension means that those who have already been granted TPS are eligible to reregister during the designated reregistration period.

11. New Naturalization Test Implemented; USCIS Updates Processing Times – USCIS began administering the redesigned naturalization test on October 1, 2008.

12. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

13. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members

14. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links


Details:

1. Employment Visa Categories Backlogged

The October 2008 Visa Bulletin disseminated by the Department of State’s Visa Office notes that the May 2008 Visa Bulletin had stated that many employment cut-off dates had been advancing very rapidly, based on indications that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) would need to review a significantly larger pool of applicants than there were numbers available to maximize number use under the fiscal year (FY) 2008 annual limits. The May Bulletin also stated that if the USCIS projections proved to be incorrect, it would be necessary to adjust the cut-off dates during the final quarter of FY 2008. USCIS estimates have proven to be very high, the October Bulletin notes, resulting in (1) the unavailability of all employment third preference categories beginning in July, (2) the unavailability of visa numbers for China and India employment second preference adjustment of status cases during September, and (3) the establishment of many October employment category cut-off dates that are earlier than those that applied during FY 2008.

Little if any forward movement of the cut-off dates in most employment categories is likely until the extent of the USCIS backlog of old priority dates can be determined, the State Department noted, estimating that the FY 2009 employment-based annual limit will be very close to the 140,000 minimum.

The EB-3 cutoff of January 1, 2005, is disappointing given the fact that it regressed 17 months from March 1, 2006, in June when the Visa Office opined that it would fully recover by October. The specter of little forward motion, and the fact that priority dates were in the 2002 range through much of the last fiscal year, gives little cause for comfort. Such employees may wish to consider filing for the DV-2010 lottery (see next story).

The October 2008 Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4357.html.

Back to Top


2. DV-2010 Visa Lottery Entry Period Begins

The DV-2010 Lottery online entry period runs from noon EDT on October 2, 2008, to noon EST on December 1, 2008. For DV-2010, Russia has been added back to the list of eligible countries. Kosovo was also added. No countries have been removed from the list of eligible countries.

Information and instructions for the DV-2010 lottery are available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/immigrants/types/types_1318.html.

Employers concerned about delays for workers caught in the EB-3 backlog (see prior story) may wish to encourage such employees to file for the DV lottery.

Back to Top


3. EAD Delays: What To Do?

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ ombudsman has been receiving numerous inquiries about employment authorization document (EAD) applications pending more than 90 days. USCIS regulations require the agency to approve EAD applications within 90 days, but that is not happening in some cases. The USCIS ombudsman recommends the following steps

Step 1: Call USCIS National Customer Service Center (NCSC) at 1-800 375-5283 and record the time and date of the call and the name and number of the representative:

  • Explain to the representative that your EAD has been pending more than 90 days and ask for a “service request.” You should receive a response to your service request within a week.

– or –

  • Ask the representative to request an interim card for you. You should receive an EAD or response within a week.

Step 2: If you choose to visit a local USCIS office, schedule an INFOPASS appointment to visit that office at http://www.infopass.uscis.gov. During the appointment, ask to apply for an interim EAD. The ombudsman notes that USCIS local offices no longer issue interim EADs, but the local office can review your case and determine eligibility. The local office will then forward your request to the appropriate USCIS Service Centers. You should receive an EAD or response within a week, the ombudsman states.

Step 3: If you have tried both Step 1 and Step 2 and have still not received your EAD or an interim card, the ombudsman asks that you e-mail cisombudsman.publicaffairs@dhs.gov the details of your efforts. Include the date and time of your call to the NCSC and the name of the representative. If you visited a USCIS office, provide that information. The ombudsman promises to “look into your case and review how we may be of assistance.”

For all other case inquiries, the ombudsman says you should submit DHS Form 7001 to the ombudsman’s office. For more on this issue, see http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/gc_1221837986181.shtm.

Back to Top


4. SEVIS Fees Increasing October 27, ICE Clarifies Procedures

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement published a final rule effective October 27, 2008, that increases the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) school certification petition fees and the application fees for nonimmigrants seeking to become academic (F visa) or vocational (M visa) students, or exchange visitors (J visa).

The rule sets the following fees: $1,700 for a school certification petition and $655 for each site visit for certification, and $200 for each F or M student. The rule also sets a $180 fee for most J exchange visitors; however, the $35 fee for each J exchange visitor seeking admission as an au pair, camp counselor, or summer work/travel program participant will remain the same.

The rule also establishes procedures for the oversight and recertification of schools attended by F and/or M students, establishes procedures for schools to submit recertification petitions, adds a provision allowing a school to voluntarily withdraw from its certification, and clarifies procedures for school operation with regard to F and M students during recertification and following a denial of recertification or a withdrawal of certification.

The full text of the final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-22786.pdf.

Back to Top


5. Congress Extends Four Immigration Programs until March 2009

Congress has extended four immigration programs that were due to expire this fall: the EB-5 immigrant investor regional center program; the E-Verify program, which allows employers to electronically verify an employee’s work eligibility; the religious worker visa program; and the Conrad State 30 program for certain foreign doctors who work in medically underserved areas. The EB-5 regional center and E-Verify programs were included in H.R. 2638, a bill that funds the federal government for the next several months. The religious worker and Conrad State 30 programs were passed in separate bills (S. 3606 and H.R. 5571, respectively). All four extensions last until March 6, 2009.
Back to Top


6. Travel May Be Risky While Adjustment Application Is Pending, Recent Case Shows

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers warns that traveling outside the U.S. while an adjustment of status application is pending can be risky, even with advance parole. A recent case illustrates this point. While his adjustment application was pending, Nadeem Hassan, a citizen of Pakistan, traveled outside the U.S. to Saudi Arabia. He received an I-512 advance parole travel document, which granted him permission to return to the U.S. so long as his application for adjustment remained pending. While Hassan was abroad, the government denied his adjustment application and revoked the advance parole. When he attempted to return to the U.S., he was denied admission, placed in expedited removal proceedings, and removed. He challenged the denial of status adjustment and revocation of advance parole.

A federal district court held that under the REAL ID Act of 2005, both the denial of the adjustment of status and the revocation of the advance parole were discretionary decisions that the court lacked jurisdiction to review, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently agreed, affirming the district court’s dismissal of the case. The Ninth Circuit noted that Hassan was granted advance parole solely to allow him to return to the U.S. while his application for status adjustment was pending. Thus, the court reasoned, once Hassan’s application for adjustment of status was denied, he was no longer eligible for advance parole.

The full text of the decision is available at http://www.metnews.com/sos.cgi?0908%2F0617252.

Back to Top


7. USCIS Reminds About ‘Flexibilities’ When Travel Is Delayed Unexpectedly

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently released a statement noting that it realizes that unexpected events in a person’s home country can sometimes affect travel or other plans. Given recent severe weather in the Caribbean, USCIS decided to issue a reminder about available services and agency “flexibilities.”

USCIS noted that nonimmigrant tourists and business visitors (B-1/B-2 visa holders) may request an extension of stay (Form I-539, Application to Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status) when unexpected events in their home country delay their travel. Those who request an extension will need to explain how the event has disrupted their ability to travel home and how much longer they anticipate staying in the U.S., and also will need to show that they will be able to support themselves in their nonimmigrant status for the additional time requested. In addition, USCIS said it will consider requests for a change of status to that of a person here temporarily on business (B-1) or pleasure (B-2) where the individual is no longer able to extend their pre-existing nonimmigrant status in another category.

USCIS also said that if unexpected events affect the ability of an F-1 or M-1 nonimmigrant student to continue to pay for his or her education, the student may request off-campus employment (Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization). To qualify, the student must demonstrate how the unexpected event has affected his or her ability to continue to pay for education without being employed.

Nonimmigrant visitors affected by unexpected events in their home country also may request expedited processing of the above applications or for an application or petition filed for a service or benefit that is otherwise immediately available.

Individuals who are abroad and have lost their USCIS-issued travel documents, or whose documents have expired due to an unexpected event that delayed their original travel plans, may contact a U.S. Embassy or Consulate, USCIS said.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=e7a1ae70ee09c110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


8. Naturalization Form Added To Direct Mail Program

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the Direct Mail program now includes Form N-400, Application for Naturalization. Non-military N-400 applications should be filed with the appropriate Lockbox. The notice also provides a 30-day transition period whereby the Service Centers will forward any N-400 applications received at their facilities to the appropriate Lockbox. Military applicants should continue to file Military N-400 cases at the Nebraska Service Center (NSC), USCIS said. In addition, NSC will also accept and process N-400s filed by spouses of active members of the military.

Beginning on October 14, 2008, applicants must submit the N-400 and related supplements to one of two new USCIS Lockbox facilities for initial processing, using the addresses provided in the notice at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-21083.pdf. A related Federal Register notice is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-21083.htm.

Back to Top


9. Ninth Circuit Upholds Arizona Law Targeting Employers Hiring Undocumented Workers

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently upheld the district court in CPLC v. Napolitano, a facial challenge to a 2007 Arizona state law, the Legal Arizona Workers Act (LAWA), that targets employers who hire undocumented workers. The law’s principal sanction is the revocation of state licenses to do business in Arizona. The Ninth Circuit noted that the law has yet to be enforced against any employer. The plaintiffs, various business and civil rights organizations, alleged that the LAWA violates employers’ rights to due process by denying them an opportunity to challenge the federal determination of the work authorization status of their employees before sanctions are imposed.

The district court had held that the law was not preempted. The main argument on appeal was that the law is expressly preempted by federal immigration law preempting state regulation other than through licensing and similar laws. The Ninth Circuit found that the district court correctly determined that the LAWA was a “licensing” law within the meaning of the federal provision and therefore was not expressly preempted.

The court also noted a secondary, implied preemption issue that principally relates to the provision requiring employers to use the electronic verification system, E-Verify, to check the work authorization status of employees through federal records. Under current federal immigration law, use of the system is voluntary; the court noted that the Arizona law makes it mandatory. The court held that such a requirement to use the federal verification tool, for which there is no substitute under development in either the state, federal, or private sectors, is not expressly or impliedly preempted by federal policy.

The plaintiffs also contended that the Arizona statute does not guarantee employers an opportunity to be heard before their business licenses may be revoked. The statute, the court said, “can and should be reasonably interpreted to allow employers, before any license can be adversely affected, to present evidence to rebut the presumption that an employee is unauthorized.” The Ninth Circuit upheld the statute in all respects against the facial challenge, but observed that it was brought against “a blank factual background of enforcement and outside the context of any particular case. If and when the statute is enforced, and the factual background is developed, other challenges to the [LAWA] as applied in any particular instance or manner will not be controlled by our decision,” the court stated.

The Ninth Circuit’s opinion is available at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/F05A5F67FDA9AEE6882574C7005021AB/$file/0717272.pdf.

Back to Top


10. USCIS Extends TPS for Nicaraguans, Hondurans, El Salvadorans; Only Updated TPS Forms Will Be Accepted

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has extended temporary protected status for 18 months for nationals of Nicaragua, Honduras, and El Salvador. TPS for Nicaraguans and Hondurans has been extended through July 5, 2010; TPS for Salvadorans has been extended through September 9, 2010. The extension means that those who have already been granted TPS are eligible to reregister during the designated reregistration period.

USCIS also issued a reminder that only the October 17, 2007, version of the Application for Temporary Protected Status (Form I-821) will be accepted. Additionally, only the May 27, 2008, or later version of the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) will be accepted. USCIS will reject all applications using previous editions.

The reminder about using updated forms is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/I-821_I-765%20reminder_17Sep08.pdf. Further information on the TPS extensions is available for Nicaraguans (http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/USCISUpdate_NicaraguaTPS_26Sep08.pdf), Hondurans (http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/USICS_Update_Honduras26Sep08.pdf), and Salvadorans (http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/update_elsal_tps_24Sep08.pdf). FAQs are also available for Nicaraguans (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=36da19e272b9c110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD), Hondurans (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=36da19e272b9c110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD), and Salvadorans (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=9ac3fcca4e49c110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD).

Back to Top


11. New Naturalization Test Implemented; USCIS Updates Processing Times

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began administering the redesigned (new) naturalization test on October 1, 2008. The revised test emphasizes the fundamental concepts of American democracy and the rights and responsibilities of citizenship.

USCIS has released a chart showing who may take the current or the new test. For the chart and additional details, including links to the test and the naturalization application, see http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=2de5bece24e7b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=2de5bece24e7b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD.

Back to Top


12. New Publications and Items of Interest

Immigration debate tracker. The German Marshall Fund of the United States presents the U.S. presidential candidates’ views on immigration. Also included are links to articles about the candidates’ views. The tracker is available at http://www.gmfus.org/election2008/debate_immigration.html.

Immigration prosecutions increase. A new report, Prosecutions for 2008, shows that federal prosecutions are up an estimated 26.8 percent over last year, and that the single largest jump in prosecutions was for immigration cases, which accounted for 49.2 percent of prosecutions through June 2008. The lead investigative agency was U.S. Customs and Border Protection, followed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. During the first nine months of 2008, the most frequently recorded charge was “entry of alien at improper time or place, with 33,792 charges recorded, followed by “reentry of deported alien,” with 15,432 charges recorded. The report, by TRAC Reports, is available at http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/crim/198/.

Nonimmigrant admissions. The Department of Homeland Security’s newly released Nonimmigrant Admissions to the United States: 2007, notes that 171 million nonimmigrants were admitted to the U.S. in 2007. These included tourists and business travelers from Canada, Mexican nationals with Border Crossing Cards, and all admissions requiring the submission of an I-94 form. I-94 admissions accounted for 22 percent (37 million) of the total admissions, the report notes. The majority (90 percent) of I-94 admissions were short-term visitors such as tourists and business travelers, while the remaining 10 percent (3.6 million) were temporary residents characterized by a longer duration of stay, such as specialty workers, students, and nurses. The leading countries of citizenship for I-94 admissions were Mexico, the United Kingdom, and Japan.

Admissions of temporary workers and trainees increased 13 percent from 2006 to 2007. The report attributes this increase primarily to the following classes: H-2A (31 percent), H-1B (23 percent), and H-2B/H-2R (16 percent). Although seasonal agricultural workers (H-2A) comprised only 7.8 percent of temporary worker admissions in 2007, the report states, the number of entries under this class increased 88 percent from 2006 to 2007. Student admissions rose 14 percent from 2006 to 2007, and 93 percent of that increase reflected academic student entries (F-1). Entries of intracompany transferees (L-1) grew 13 percent from 2006 to 2007, and exchange visitor admissions (J-1) increased 15 percent during the same period.

The report notes that the leading countries of citizenship for H-1 admissions in 2007 were India (34 percent), Canada (5.7 percent), and the United Kingdom (5.5 percent). From 2006 to 2007, H-1B admissions from India increased 25 percent (32,000 admissions).

Nearly half of academic student admissions (F-1) were nationals of five countries: South Korea (15 percent), India (9.4 percent), China (8.5 percent), Japan (8.2 percent), and Mexico (7 percent), the report notes. Since 2005, Mexico, China, and India have shown consistent increases in F-1 admissions, while admissions from Japan have declined.

The report is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/ois_ni_fr_2007.pdf. The DHS also has released Data on Nonimmigrant Admissions,available at http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/YrBk07NI.shtm, and Estimates of the Unauthorized Immigrant Population Residing in the United States: January 2007, available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibr.

Back to Top


13. Recent News from ABIL Members

Steven A. Clark (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-clark.cfm) made a presentation at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s 2008 PERM CLE Conference in Chicago on August 25, 2008. His panel, “A Walk Through the New 9089,” discussed how the changes in the new PERM form, to become effective January 2009, will affect labor certification practice and offered practice tips for practitioners navigating the new form.

Angelo A. Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) was quoted recently in the Orange County Register. Commenting on the Department of Labor’s position that an employer may not require foreign workers to pay either the legal or filing fees for an H-1B visa petition, Mr. Paparelli noted that typically a petition may cost $2,320 and legal fees may run $2,000 to $4,000 per worker. “If the employer forces the immigrant to pay those fees and the worker complains, DOL will make the employer pay the fees plus back wages,” he said. “This falls heavily on small companies that can’t afford [the fees and penalties], yet they need to compete with big companies for the best workers.” The article is available at http://jan.freedomblogging.com/2008/09/08/fee-rule-for-immigrant-knowledge-workers-a-landmine/.

Back to Top


14. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm

Department of State Visa Bulletin: http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-10-01 00:00:212019-09-18 02:28:55News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 10 • October 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 9 • September 01, 2008

September 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. New Passport Card Is Acceptable For Employment Eligibility Verification – The passport card is considered a “List A” document that may be presented by newly hired employees during the employment eligibility verification process.

2. USCIS Issues Work Authorization Application Version Reminder – USCIS issued a reminder to use the correct version of the I-765 dated May 27, 2008.

3. E-Verify Provokes Controversy – The Department of Homeland Security’s plan to expand the E-Verify online work authorization verification program to all federal contractors has led to controversy.

4. Fragomen Files Lawsuit Against DOL Over Special Audit; DOL Releases Guidance – The firm has moved for a preliminary injunction that would prevent the DOL from enforcing its new interpretation of the law.

5. Electronic VWP Application System Now Available – Effective January 12, 2009, all VWP travelers will be required to obtain an electronic travel authorization before boarding a carrier to travel by air or sea to the U.S. under the VWP.

6. Global Entry Program Expands – The U.S. Department of Homeland Security recently announced the expansion of the “Global Entry” pilot program to four additional airports.

7. USCIS Extends TPS to Sudan – The extension will last 18 months, through May 2, 2010; eligible Sudanese must apply by October 14.

8. USCIS Proposes Changes to H-2B Temporary Nonagricultural Worker Program, Withdraws Earlier Proposed Rule – The changes, if implemented, would make the H-2B visa a viable option for many more jobs with U.S. employers, including professional occupations with project-based timelines.

9. Mississippi Raid Largest in U.S. History; ICE Arrests Hundreds in Other Raids – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents took nearly 600 plant workers into custody.

10. New Naturalization Test Implemented; USCIS Updates Processing Times – USCIS will begin administering the redesigned naturalization test on October 1, 2008.

11. Third Preference Category Unavailable for September – Many other employment-based dates are current for September 2008 but the third preference and “other workers” categories are unavailable.

12. Canada Introduces Fast Track to Permanent Residence – The Canadian Experience Class, a new proposed avenue for immigration for certain temporary foreign workers and foreign student graduates with Canadian work experience, would allow an applicant’s Canadian experience to be considered a key factor when immigrating to Canada.

13. ABIL Immigration Compliance & Strategies Conference – ABIL Immigration Compliance & Strategies Conference

14. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. New Passport Card Is Acceptable For Employment Eligibility Verification

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the new U.S. passport card may be used in the employment eligibility verification (Form I-9) process.

Last month, the Departments of State and Homeland Security announced that the new passport card was in full production. The new card “provides a less expensive and more portable alternative to the traditional passport book, and will expedite document processing at United States land and sea ports-of-entry for U.S. citizens traveling to Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Bermuda,” the agencies said.

The new passport card is limited in its uses for international travel (e.g., it may not be used for international air travel), but it is a valid passport that attests to the U.S. citizenship and identity of the bearer. Accordingly, USCIS said, the card may be used for the I-9 process and can also be accepted by employers participating in the E-Verify program.

The passport card is considered a “List A” document that may be presented by newly hired employees during the employment eligibility verification process to show work authorized status. “List A” documents are those used by employees to prove both identity and work authorization when completing the I-9.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=8daff5a7ebd9b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


2. USCIS Issues Work Authorization Application Version Reminder

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a reminder to use the correct version of the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) dated 05/27/08. The edition date appears in the lower right hand corner of the form as “Form I-765 (Rev. 05/27/08) N.”

Submission of an earlier version of the I-765 may result in rejection of the application, USCIS said.

The I-765 instructions and application are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=73ddd59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=e8de36ad2e9cb110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


3. E-Verify Provokes Controversy

The Department of Homeland Security’s plan to expand the E-Verify online work authorization verification program to all federal contractors has led to controversy.

Randy Johnson, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Vice President for Labor, Immigration, and Employee Benefits, told Federal News Radio that “[i]f they go forward with the final rule and don’t respond to our concerns, I think very well we’ll go into court. I think there’s a good chance we’ll go into court anyway[ ] because…the Congressional statute actually says that the program is voluntary and, in our view, making it a condition of a federal contract, in fact, renders it mandatory in violation of the underlying Congressional statute.” He said the expansion was “too quick” and untested, noting that “frankly, there’s some legal problems with regard to whether or not the agencies even have the legal authority to do it.”

Mr. Johnson said the Government Accountability Office needs to study E-Verify further. He noted that some companies “are concerned about this regulation because of immigration concerns, but then there’s another raft of companies, such as major contractors who are household names, that are concerned about it because it’s just going to slow down the procurement process and already make it more complicated.” He noted that colleges and universities that have federal contracts also have raised concerns.

Jennifer Kerber, Senior Director of ITAA’s Federal and Homeland Security Programs, told Federal News Radio that ITAA would welcome E-Verify but is concerned about “the scalability of the system, the accuracy of the underlying data and the increased burden on federal contractors and government agencies.” She noted that “today, according to the E-Verify system officials, there’s an eight percent no-match rate. So, you take eight percent for 61,000 people using it [now], and you put eight percent on 7.4 million people using it [if it becomes mandatory] — what kind of increased delays in government contract performance are we going to have?”

The Department of Homeland Security plans to offer a half-day information session on the E-Verify program. The session will include a live demonstration of the E-Verify system followed by a question-and-answer session. Dates and times have not yet been announced. For more information on the seminar, see http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=539248ea3a72b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=a16988e60a405110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD. General information about E-Verify is available at http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify.

Back to Top


4. Fragomen Files Lawsuit Against DOL Over Special Audit; DOL Releases Guidance

On August 8, 2008, Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP (Fragomen) filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Washington, D.C., seeking an injunction against the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) special audit of labor certification applications filed by the firm.

Fragomen said it believes that “it was necessary to file a lawsuit because DOL’s actions have been unlawful and unconstitutional. The Department has sought to deny our clients’ right to counsel under the Constitution, and is retroactively applying a new interpretation of its own regulations.”

The firm has moved for a preliminary injunction that would prevent the DOL from enforcing its new interpretation of the law and has asked the court to order the agency to abide by its own regulations and the Constitution. The relief requested includes an order cancelling the special audit component of pending PERM cases so that those cases could return to the regular review queue.

The Department of Labor posted on its Web site related guidance released in June regarding labor certifications. A new “restatement” issued on August 29, 2008, supersedes the earlier guidance in response to the agency’s receipt of “considerable feedback” from employers. The earlier guidance noted, among other things, that:

Where the Department finds evidence of potentially improper attorney, agent, or foreign worker involvement in considering U.S. worker applicants, the Department may audit applications to determine whether the employer’ recruitment and hiring processes were conducted in good faith and to ensure adherence to all statutory and regulatory requirements.

The earlier guidance outlined the following prohibitions:

  • Attorneys and agents may receive resumes and applications from U.S. workers who respond to the employer’s recruitment efforts. They may not conduct any preliminary screening of applications before the employer does so, however, unless the attorney or agent is the representative of the employer who routinely performs this function for positions for which labor certifications are not filed. The attorney or agent may not withhold from the employer any resumes or applications that it receives from U.S. workers.
  • Attorneys and agents may not participate in the interviewing of U.S. worker applicants, unless the attorney or agent is the representative of the employer who routinely performs this function for positions for which labor certifications are not filed. Such involvement, because of its uniqueness, has resulted in an impermissible “chilling effect” on the interests of U.S. worker-applicants in the position.
  • After the evaluation of applications by the employer has been completed, the employer may consult with its attorney or agent about the implications of its qualification determinations on the labor certification application. Those consultations can encompass the question of whether applicants who were found by the employer to be unqualified were rejected for lawful, job-related reasons. Under no circumstances, however, should an attorney or agent seek to dissuade an employer from its initial determination that a particular applicant is minimally qualified, able, willing and available for the position in question.

The August 29 restatement notes that:

  • [G]iven that the permanent labor certification program imposes recruitment standards on the employer that may deviate from the employer’s normal standards of evaluation, the Department understands and appreciates the legitimate role attorneys and agents play in the permanent labor certification process. Additionally, the Department respects the right of employers to consult with their attorney(s) or agent(s) during that process to ensure that they are complying with all applicable legal requirements.
  • By prohibiting attorneys, agents, and foreign workers from interviewing and considering U.S. workers during the permanent labor certification process,…the Department does not thereby prohibit attorneys and agents from performing the analyses necessary to counsel their clients on legal questions that may arise with respect to this process. The employer, and not the attorney or agent, must be the first to review an application for employment, and must determine whether a U.S. applicant’s qualifications meet the minimum requirements for the position, unless the attorney or agent is the representative of the employer who routinely performs this function for positions for which labor certifications are not filed. By requiring that initial reviews of and final determinations on all applications are made by the employer, the Department seeks to ensure that the consideration process is as close to the employer’s non-immigration-related hiring process as possible and that U.S. workers receive full and fair consideration by the employer for the job. Attorneys (and, to the extent it is consistent with state rules governing the practice of law, agents) may, however, provide advice throughout the consideration process on any and all legal questions concerning compliance with governing statutes, regulations, and policies.

The August 29 restatement notes that where the Department finds evidence of “potentially improper” attorney, agent, or foreign worker involvement in considering U.S. worker applicants, the Department will audit those applications and subsequently may require supervised recruitment.

The DOL’s August 29 restatement is available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/PERM_Guidance_Final_082908.pdf. The agency’s earlier guidance is available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/PERMRule20CFR65610b2.pdf. Fragomen’s announcement is available at http://pubweb.fdbl.com/news1.nsf/9abe5d703b986cff86256e310080943a/f08d74778d94da65852574a200680691?OpenDocument.

Back to Top


5. Electronic VWP Application System Now Available

The Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) is now accessible online for citizens and eligible nationals of Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries to apply for advance authorization to travel to the United States under the VWP. Effective January 12, 2009, all VWP travelers will be required to obtain an electronic travel authorization before boarding a carrier to travel by air or sea to the U.S. under the VWP.

To use the system, log onto the ESTA Web site at https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov and complete an online application in English. Travelers are encouraged to apply early. The Web-based system will prompt you to answer basic biographical and eligibility questions typically requested on a paper I-94W form. Basic information on ESTA is available in Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Spanish, and Swedish.

Applications may be submitted at any time before traveling. The Department of Homeland Security recommends, however, that applications be submitted at least 72 hours before traveling. In most cases, the DHS promises, you will receive one of the following responses “within seconds”:

  1. Authorization Approved: Travel is authorized.
  2. Travel Not Authorized: The traveler must obtain a nonimmigrant visa at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate before traveling to the U.S.
  3. Authorization Pending: The traveler will need to check the ESTA Web site for updates within 72 hours to receive a final response.

An approved travel authorization via ESTA is:

  • Required for all VWP travelers before boarding a carrier to travel by air or sea to the U.S. under the VWP beginning January 12, 2009;
  • Valid, unless revoked, for up to two years or until the traveler’s passport expires, whichever comes first;
  • Valid for multiple entries into the U.S. As future trips are planned, or if an applicant’s destination addresses or itineraries change after authorization has been obtained, the applicant may update that information through the ESTA Web site; and
  • Not a guarantee of admissibility to the U.S. at a port of entry. ESTA approval only authorizes a traveler to board a carrier for travel to the U.S. under the VWP. Additional information is available in “For International Visitors” at http://www.CBP.gov/travel. The ESTA Web site is at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/id_visa/esta/esta_intro/.

Additional information is available in “For International Visitors” at http://www.CBP.gov/travel. The ESTA Web site is at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/id_visa/esta/esta_intro/.

 

Back to Top


6. Global Entry Program Expands

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security recently announced the expansion of the “Global Entry” pilot program to four additional airports: Los Angeles International, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International, Chicago O’Hare International, and Miami International.

Upon arrival at the airport, Global Entry-approved participants bypass the regular passport control line and proceed directly to the Global Entry kiosk. At the kiosk, Global Entry travelers activate the system by inserting their passports or U.S. permanent resident cards into a document reader. The kiosk directs travelers to provide digital fingerprints and compares them with the fingerprints on file.

The new Global Entry sites are expected to be operational in the fall of 2008, and will be equipped with kiosks for expedited processing. As part of the program’s expansion, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will install Global Entry kiosks at additional international terminals at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK). The Global Entry pilot program began June 10 at JFK, George Bush Intercontinental Airport, and Washington Dulles International Airport. Approximately 1,100 members have already enrolled and about 370 Global Entry members have used kiosks at the existing pilot locations.

Global Entry travelers are photographed and prompted to answer declaration questions on the kiosk’s touch-screen. A transaction receipt is issued upon completion, which must be presented to CBP officers before leaving the inspection area.

The dates of the expansion of the Global Entry pilot program to the individual airports will be announced at http://www.cbp.gov. For more information on the program, see http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/trusted_traveler/global_entry/. The expansion was announced in a Federal Register notice available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-18724.pdf.

Back to Top


7. USCIS Extends TPS to Sudan

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it is extending temporary protected status (TPS) to nationals of Sudan or people having no nationality who last habitually resided in Sudan. The extension covers an estimated 500 Sudanese who have already applied for and received benefits under TPS since the October 7, 2004, re-designation. The extension will last 18 months, through May 2, 2010. Applicants must file during the 60-day re-registration period (August 14, 2008, through October 14, 2008).

Sudanese currently registered under TPS who desire an extension must re-register by filing both an Application for Temporary Protected Status (Form I-821) and an Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765), with the appropriate fees or fee waiver requests. The I-821 has been revised and applicants must use the version dated 10/17/2007 or later. The I-765 also has been revised and applicants must use the version dated 5/27/2008 or later. Failure to use these versions of the forms may result in rejection of the application. Certain nationals of Sudan who have not previously applied for TPS may be able to apply under the late initial registration process.

A notice announcing the TPS extension is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=c024c623f8dbb110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. A fact sheet is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=5f27c623f8dbb110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Proposes Changes to H-2B Temporary Nonagricultural Worker Program, Withdraws Earlier Proposed Rule

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a proposed rule on August 20, 2008, that would streamline procedures for hiring workers under the H-2B program, supplementing the changes the agency proposed last spring. The H-2B nonimmigrant temporary worker program allows U.S. employers to bring foreign nationals to the United States to fill temporary nonagricultural jobs for which U.S. workers are not available.

The most important changes include:

  • The employer’s “temporary need” for a worker could be as long as three years. Until now, it has been believed widely that the need could not exceed nine months per stay, followed by a hiatus of at least three months. This has limited the number of assignments for which the H-2B is attractive, but many employers have projects that could end within three years, followed by a three-month absence from the US. Specifically, USCIS proposes changing the definition of “temporary employment” to include jobs for which the work will end in the near, definable future and to eliminate the requirement that employers show “extraordinary circumstances” to be eligible to hire H-2B workers for up to three years.
  • The wait outside the U.S. for those who want to switch from H-2B to H-1B or L-1 visas would be reduced to three months (instead of the current six months).

These two changes, if implemented, would make the H-2B visa a viable option for many more jobs with U.S. employers, including professional occupations with project-based timelines. Several other provisions are proposed for purposes of fraud prevention in the H-2B program.

The agency also withdrew an earlier proposed regulation published in 2005 that would have established a one-step petition process for U.S. employers seeking H–2B temporary workers, eliminating the need for employers to apply for a labor certification; required electronic filing of the Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, Form I–129, within 60 days in advance of the requested employment start date; eliminated the use of agents as H–2B petitioners; and established new management mechanisms. In light of the public’s comments, USCIS said it is no longer moving forward with the proposed rule as designed and will publish a new proposed rule for public comment.http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-19322.pdf.

USCIS will accept public comments until September 19, 2008, on the new proposed rule, which is published at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-19306.pdf. The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=5d07a176642cb110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=3381c0ed71f85110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD. A fact sheet is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/h-2-faq-15Aug08.pdf.

Back to Top


9. Mississippi Raid Largest in U.S. History; ICE Arrests Hundreds in Other Raids

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents took nearly 600 plant workers into custody on August 25, 2008, in what is reportedly the largest immigration raid in U.S. history. The raid at the Howard Industries transformer plant was the result of an investigation prompted by a tip from a union member. The workers were from Brazil, El Salvador, Germany, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, and Peru, ICE said. The agency also arrested 400 workers on May 12 at the Agriprocessors meatpacking plant in Iowa, and seized a number of fraudulent green cards from the company’s human resources department.

Meanwhile, ICE arrested 42 undocumented men at Washington Dulles International Airport as part of a critical infrastructure protection (CIP) operation. ICE agents, with support of airport security agencies, arrested the men just inside the airport grounds at a checkpoint established to verify the identity and immigration status of workers entering a service gate.

ICE agents interviewed more than 200 individuals to verify their identities, immigration status, and eligibility for lawful employment in the U.S. Among those arrested were nationals of Argentina, Bolivia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, and Peru. Most of the individuals encountered worked on construction projects at the airport. Those detained are being interviewed, fingerprinted, photographed, and entered into Department of Homeland Security databases at a local ICE office.

In another action, 57 undocumented workers at Mills Manufacturing Corporation (MMC) in Asheville, North Carolina, were arrested by ICE special agents. MMC is a Department of Defense contractor responsible for the manufacturing of parachutes for the U.S. military. Among those arrested were nationals of Mexico, Guatemala, Ecuador, and Honduras.

The arrests were based on an ICE investigation that revealed, ICE said, that the workers had used fraudulent social security numbers to obtain employment. The agency said the company has been fully cooperative and is not a target of the ICE investigation.

All of those arrested were transferred to the Henderson County Sheriff’s Office for immigration processing, and all were placed into removal proceedings for being in violation of U.S. immigration law. Those arrested were interviewed by ICE agents to determine if they had medical, caregiver, or other humanitarian issues. ICE identified approximately 29 individuals who qualified for humanitarian release and will be required to appear before a federal immigration judge.

In fiscal year 2008, ICE agents have made more than 700 administrative arrests and 100 criminal arrests at critical infrastructure facilities. As of July 2008, ICE has made more than 3,800 administrative arrests overall for immigration violations during worksite enforcement operations.

The Mississippi announcement is available at http://www.ice.gov/pi/nr/0808/080826laurel.htm. The Dulles announcement is available at http://www.ice.gov/pi/nr/0808/080813washington.htm. The MMC announcement is available at http://www.ice.gov/pi/nr/0808/080812asheville.htm.

Back to Top


10. New Naturalization Test Implemented; USCIS Updates Processing Times

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will begin administering the redesigned (new) naturalization test on October 1, 2008. The revised test emphasizes the fundamental concepts of American democracy and the rights and responsibilities of citizenship.

USCIS has released a chart showing who may take the current or the new test. For the chart and additional details, including links to the test and the naturalization application, see http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=ebf1bece24e7b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=ebf1bece24e7b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD.

USCIS also announced that it anticipates naturalization application processing will average 10-12 months nationally by the end of September 2008. Last year, its estimated average processing time was 16-18 months.

Estimated naturalization times as of September 2008, broken down by field office, are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=72fd5d63502bb110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


11. Third Preference Category Unavailable for September

Many other employment-based dates are current for September 2008 but the third preference and “other workers” categories are unavailable. The cut-off date for both the China-mainland born and India second preference categories is August 1, 2006.

The Mexico employment third preference category is unavailable for September, the State Department’s Visa Office said, because the fiscal year 2008 annual limit has been reached. The Visa Office initially anticipated that this would be temporary until the start of the new fiscal year in October. Continued heavy demand may require the establishment of a cut-off date earlier than anticipated, the Visa Office noted. The October cut-off dates have not yet been announced.

The September 2008 Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4328.html.

Back to Top


12. Canada Introduces Fast Track to Permanent Residence

The Canadian Experience Class, a new proposed avenue for immigration for certain temporary foreign workers and foreign student graduates with Canadian work experience, would allow an applicant’s Canadian experience to be considered a key selection factor when immigrating to Canada, according to Citizenship and Immigration Canada.

The Canadian Experience Class would allow certain temporary foreign workers and certain foreign student graduates with managerial, professional, or technical or trade work experience to apply to become permanent residents, and eventually Canadian citizens. All applicants, depending on their occupational skill level, would be required to demonstrate either basic or moderate language skills.

“The Canadian Experience Class is one more measure this government is proposing to make our immigration system more attractive and accessible to individuals with diverse skills from around the world, and more responsive to Canada’s labour market needs,” said Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Diane Finley. “This new proposed avenue for immigration would also go further to spread the benefits of immigration into smaller centres across Canada.” Temporary foreign workers and foreign students are generally spread out across Canada and contribute to the growth of smaller communities as well as metropolitan areas. Individuals applying for permanent residence through this new avenue could apply from within Canada while continuing to work and to contribute to their local communities.

The Canadian Experience Class comes after a number of recent initiatives the Canadian government has undertaken to help newcomers succeed and to help make Canada a more attractive destination for skilled individuals from around the world, the agency said. These initiatives include changes to the Post-Graduation Work Permit Program; the establishment of the Foreign Credentials Referral Office; increased investments in language training and other programs and services aimed at helping newcomers settle and integrate into their new communities successfully; and, most recently, changes to the immigration system that would allow for priority processing of certain skilled applicants and reduced wait times for those wanting to immigrate to Canada.

“Choosing newcomers based on knowledge of our labour market and experience within Canadian society would make Canada a more attractive destination for skilled individuals from around the world,” noted Minister Finley. “International students and skilled workers would be more likely to choose Canada if they knew their time in Canada and contribution to Canadian society would assist in their eligibility to apply to stay permanently.”

The announcement is available at http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/releases/2008/2008-08-12.asp.

Back to Top


13. ABIL Immigration Compliance & Strategies Conference

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) will present a high-level half-day seminar for corporate human resources and in-house legal professionals, including immigration specialists, HR managers, and general counsel and paralegal staff with a wide range of experience in immigration compliance, in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, October 30, 2008. Topics include immigration compliance, I-9s, E-Verify, H-1Bs, LCAs and PERM, and strategies and solutions for moving employees from F-1 to H-1B visa status and to permanent resident status. For more information, e-mail ABIL Administrator Lauren Anderson at lauren@abil.com. Registration will close on October 2, 2008.
Back to Top


14. Recent News from ABIL Members

The Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) filed an amicus brief in Brazil Quality Stones Inc. v. Chertoff, 531 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2008), in which the court concluded that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services did not abuse its discretion in denying a small corporation’s petition to extend the visa of its Brazilian president and chief executive officer. The opinion is available at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/newopinions.nsf/3526B4ED6EBB65A288257481007E9F9D/$file/0655879.pdf?openelement.

Several ABIL Global Members have published articles recently in Who’s Who Legal Briefing:

  • “A Three-Point Immigration Manifesto for Chief Legal Officers and Outside Counsel,” by Angelo A. Paparelli, President of ABIL (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm), available at http://www.whoswholegal.com/news/article/1190/newsletter
  • “Good Migrations,” by Laura Devine (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-devine.cfm), available at http://www.whoswholegal.com/news/article/1192/newsletter
  • “Going Green – U.S. Consular Processing Enters the Electronic Paperless Era in 2008,” co-authored by Bernard Wolfsdorf (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-wolfsdorf.cfm), available at http://www.whoswholegal.com/news/article/1194/newsletter

ABIL Global Members ranked highly in The International Who’s Who of Corporate Immigration Lawyers 2008; see http://www.whoswholegal.com/news/article/1198/newsletter/ for the rankings.

Mr. Paparelli (bio link above) recently blogged on the Department of Labor’s announcement of the audit of all labor certification clients of Fragomen, Del Rey & Bernsen, and the agency’s subsequent backtracking and August 29, 2008, “restatement.” See http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/.

Steve Garfinkel (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-garfinkel.cfm) will be speaking at the North Carolina SHRM State Conference on September 11 in Concord, North Carolina. Mr. Garfinkel will serve on a panel, “The Face of Immigration in America,” and will discuss employment-based immigration law challenges. He also has been invited to speak at Florida State University’s Center for Human Resource Management in Ft. Lauderdale on October 3, 2008, on employment-based immigration law issues.

H. Ronald Klasko (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm), the founding partner of the immigration law firm Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer LLP, has been named Corporate Immigration Lawyer of the Year by Who’s Who Legal 2008: The International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers for the second consecutive year. Nominations for this award were made by clients and fellow professionals. According to the publication, Mr. Klasko “was the most highly nominated individual overall.”

Mr. Klasko also recently addressed immigration lawyers nationwide on the advantages of using the EB-5 Regional Center Investment Program to assist their foreign clients wishing to invest in the United States and get a green card. His speech was part of a national teleconference held on September 4, 2008, and organized by the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers.

Laura J. Danielson (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-danielson.cfm) and Cyrus D. Mehta (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) spoke during an American Immigration Lawyers Association Audio Seminar on August 19, 2008. The topic was green card (permanent residence) self-sponsorship, including what self-sponsorship means; whether creating a separate business entity helps; and self-sponsorship in the immigrant visa context (labor certification; EB-1 extraordinary ability; outstanding researchers and multinational managers; EB-2 national interest waivers; and EB-5 investors.

Steve Yale-Loehr (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) will speak on immigration law issues at a conference sponsored by the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C., on September 24, 2008. Mr. Yale-Loehr also will speak on EB-5 immigrant investor issues at the 22nd annual AILA Central Florida Chapter immigration law seminar in Clearwater, Florida, on October 3, 2008.

Upon Juan P. Osuna’s being named the first Latino chairman of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Mr. Yale-Loehr (bio link above) said, “Juan is very well-qualified to be the head of the BIA. He has the institutional memory and knows what is important for the BIA to function well and fulfill its purpose.” Mr. Paparelli (bio link above) said he thinks Mr. Osuna’s appointment “is confirmation of a job well done as the acting chairman. The system is in quite a state of structural chaos.” He noted that “[i]t’s a very positive change because Juan’s a judge committed to justice, rather than committed to politics.”

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-09-01 00:00:122019-09-18 02:33:13News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 9 • September 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 8 • August 01, 2008

August 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Bill Would Extend E-Verify for 10 Years – With E-Verify set to expire in November, some lawmakers feel there is insufficient time to do anything other than pass a 5-year extension.

2. New ?Exit Tax? on U.S. Citizens and Long-term Permanent Residents – The new exit tax is a major deterrent for wealthy individuals who are considering applying for permanent residence.

3. EB-2 Numbers for India, China Advance in August; Employment Third Preference Category Are Unavailable – The EB-2 visa category for India and China advances in August to June 1, 2006, a jump of more than two years.

4. Labor Dept. Proposes Modifying LCA, Seeks Comment on Labor Certs for Ag Workers – The LCA modifications are primarily due to the conversion to the electronic submission system; the Department also seeks comment on measures to improve the labor certification program for the temporary employment of nonimmigrant agricultural workers.

5. State Dept. Releases Annual Student and Exchange Visitor Update – The cable asks posts to have a clear procedure in place for expediting F, M, and J appointments.

6. USCIS Adds Vaccines to Requirements for Permanent Residents – USCIS revised the list of vaccines required for applicants seeking permanent resident status.

7. USCIS Updates Cap Info for H-1B Workers for FY 2009 – USCIS has added 5,800, the projected number of unused H-1B1 Chile/Singapore visas, to the FY 2009 H-1B cap; this does not necessarily mean that more H-1B visa cases can be filed for FY 2009, however.

8. USCIS Extends Validity of EADs for Refugees – USCIS is extending the validity of initial work authorization documents for refugees to two years after arrival in the U.S.

9. TSA Testifies on Watch Lists; ACLU Protests – The TSA is exploring possible enforcement action against air carriers who tell passengers inaccurately that they are watch-listed.

10. USCIS Revises Biometric Instructions for Reentry Permits and Refugee Travel Documents – Applicants for re-entry permits and refugee travel documents must provide biometrics (e.g., fingerprints and photographs) at a USCIS Application Support Center.

11. USCIS Continues Suspension of Premium Processing for Religious Workers – USCIS said it cannot reasonably ensure a level of processing service within 15 calendar days.

12. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

13. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Bill Would Extend E-Verify for 10 Years

With E-Verify set to expire in November, some lawmakers feel there is insufficient time to do anything other than pass a 5-year extension. “We’ve got six weeks left in this session, and we’re just not going to get that done,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal.). She and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) are moving a bill for a 5-year extension through the House of Representatives. It is unclear whether the Senate will agree. Any reform of the verification process will have to wait until the next administration.
Back to Top


2. New ?Exit Tax? on U.S. Citizens and Long-term Permanent Residents

A new “exit tax” applies to U.S. citizens who expatriate and long-term permanent residents who lose their status (voluntarily or otherwise) on or after June 17, 2008.  The exit tax includes a capital gains tax on the unrealized gain in a covered expatriate’s worldwide assets, and a transfer tax on all gifts and bequests from a covered expatriate to any U.S. person during the life or upon the death of the covered expatriate.  A “covered expatriate” is a person who gives up U.S. citizenship or loses permanent resident status (having held it for at least 8 of the past 15 years) and who:  (1) has a net worth of more than $2 million; or (2) had average U.S. federal income tax liability of more than $139,000 over the past 5 years; or (3) fails to certify under penalty of perjury that he has complied with all federal tax obligations for the past 5 years.  There are limited exceptions for dual citizens from birth and persons who expatriate before age 18 and ½ years.

The exit tax is a major deterrent for wealthy individuals who are considering permanent resident status, and a potentially huge tax penalty for permanent residents who wish to leave the U.S. or have already done so.  It is already prompting wealthy individuals who have held permanent resident status for less than 8 years to surrender their green cards before they become subject to this tax.  In such circumstances, there are several nonimmigrant visa options that permit long-term residence in the U.S. without exposure to the exit tax.

The exit tax is contained in the Heroes Earnings Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008, which is available at http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6081/text.  Prior to enactment, ABIL member Steve Trow published an article titled “The Exit Tax – A Perfectly Bad Idea” in Tax Notes International and a second article titled “Exit Tax: Eying the Turnstile Again” in Bender’s Immigration Bulletin.  Copies of these articles are available upon request from info@trowlaw.com.

Back to Top


3. EB-2 Numbers for India, China Advance in August; Employment Third Preference Category Are Unavailable

The Department of State’s Visa Bulletin for August notes that the employment-based second preference (EB-2) visa category for India and China has advanced to June 1, 2006, a jump of more than two years. Meanwhile, demand for visa numbers has resulted in the employment third preference “Other Worker” category reaching the annual fiscal year 2008 numerical limit. As a result, this category has become unavailable beginning in August and will remain so for the remainder of FY 2008. This will be temporary, however, and the employment third preference cut-off date will return in October, the first month of the new fiscal year, to January 1, 2003. Other employment categories are not expected to move in August.

The Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4310.html.

Back to Top


4. Labor Dept. Proposes Modifying LCA, Seeks Comment on Labor Certs for Ag Workers

The Department of Labor seeks comment on the labor condition application (LCA) for H-1B, H-1B1, and E-3 nonimmigrants. The modifications being proposed to ETA Forms 9035, 9035CP, and 9035E are primarily due to the elimination of the “Fax Back” system and converting exclusively to the electronic submission system, except in rare cases of physical disability that prevents use of a computer. The Department noted that all three forms need to be updated to eliminate all reference to the “Fax Back” system and “provide more clarity to the user of the form, thereby obtaining more accurate information for the Department to assist in more efficient and effective adjudication of the requested benefit.” The Department said the information collected remains the same. The Federal Register notice related to the LCA is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-14464.pdf.

The Department also seeks comment on measures to improve the labor certification program for the temporary employment of H-2A nonimmigrant agricultural workers. The Department noted that employers who have received certification for temporary foreign agricultural labor must inform their local State Workforce Agency (SWA) in writing if the H-2A workers do not depart for the place of employment three days before the date of need as specified in their labor certification applications. The departure date is used to start the running of the contract period for administration of the “Fifty Percent Rule.” The employer must continue to provide employment to any qualified and eligible U.S. worker who applies to the employer until 50 percent of the work contract period, under which the foreign worker is in the job, has elapsed. The employer’s obligation to engage in positive recruitment ends on the date the foreign workers depart for the employer’s place of business. The notification required under the regulations is written by the employer and sent to the SWA. The SWA uses the information to calculate the end of active recruitment requirements and Fifty Percent Rule referral requirements.

The Department is particularly interested in comments that: (1) evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses.

That notice is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-14465.pdf.

Back to Top


5. State Dept. Releases Annual Student and Exchange Visitor Update

The Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs has released the annual update of its student and exchange visitor (F, J, and J visas) issues. The cable asks posts to have a clear procedure in place for expediting F, M, and J appointments, with first-time applicants being given the highest priority. The cable also discusses summer work and travel issues, clarifies some information on Form DS-2019, and reminds posts about required annotations and the end of requirements to put DS-2019 forms in sealed envelopes. The cable also notes the changes in J-1 sponsor sanctions procedures.

The cable is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_4202.html.

Back to Top


6. USCIS Adds Vaccines to Requirements for Permanent Residents

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on July 24, 2008, a revised list of vaccines required for applicants seeking permanent resident status. This revision follows guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

CDC’s revised Technical Instructions to Civil Surgeons for Vaccination Requirements require the following age-appropriate additional vaccinations to adjust status to legal permanent resident:

  • Rotavirus
  • Hepatitis A
  • Meningococcal
  • Human papillomavirus
  • Zoster

The requirements for these new vaccines went into effect on July 1, 2008; however, CDC approved a 30-day grace period for any medical exam conducted before August 1, 2008. Starting on that date, the new vaccinations, if appropriate, must be administered for USCIS to approve the applicant for adjustment of status.

USCIS has revised the Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record (Form I-693) to include these new vaccination requirements. The June 5, 2008, edition of the I-693 must be used for any medical examination completed on or after August 1, 2008.

USCIS’s notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=902252b10f45b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. The CDC’s revised Technical Instructions to Civil Surgeons for Vaccination Requirements are available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dq/civil.htm. USCIS has posted a list of frequently asked questions about the revised vaccination requirements at http://www.uscis.gov.

Back to Top


7. USCIS Updates Cap Info for H-1B Workers for FY 2009

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently noted that 6,800 visas are set aside during the fiscal year for the H-1B1 program under legislation implementing the U.S.-Chile and U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreements. Unused numbers in this pool can be made available for H-1B use with start dates beginning on October 1, 2008, the start of FY 2009. USCIS has added 5,800, the projected number of unused H-1B1 Chile/Singapore visas, to the FY 2009 H-1B cap. As of the update, the cap for H-1B1s for FY2009 had not been reached.

This does not necessarily mean that more H-1B visa cases can be filed for FY 2009, however. In the past, USCIS has taken unused Chile/Singapore H-1B numbers into account in their estimates based on prior usage and not adjusted the allocation once the final count became available.

This and related updates are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=138b6138f898d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD&vgnextchannel=91919c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


8. USCIS Extends Validity of EADs for Refugees

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently announced that it is extending the validity of initial Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for refugees to two years after arrival in the United States. Previous policy required renewal of the EAD after one year, except in certain adjustment cases that were expected to remain pending for more than one year.

USCIS said the new policy will reduce the financial burden on refugees by eliminating the need for many refugees to apply for renewal of work authorization documents before they are able to adjust status to permanent residence. There is no fee for the initial application for a refugee EAD, but applicants incur a $340 fee for renewals.

USCIS estimated that a refugee would request, at minimum, one EAD renewal before adjustment of status if the EAD validity period were not extended to two years.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f8ef93de9b21b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


9. TSA Testifies on Watch Lists; ACLU Protests

Transportation Security Administration (TSA) administrator Kip Hawley recently testified before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Aviation on TSA’s use of subsets of the terror watch list and airlines’ misidentifying passengers on these watch lists, a topic that has been in the news recently as a CNN reporter and others have been sent repeatedly to secondary inspections following their alleged erroneous inclusion in the watch lists and inability to have their names removed.

The TSA noted that “misidentification hassles at the airline ticket counter is consistently among the most frustrating complaints of the traveling public.” The TSA announced a solution that requires action by the airlines. The TSA said that each airline now has the flexibility to create a system to verify and store securely a passenger’s date of birth, to clear up watch list misidentifications. By voluntarily providing this data to an airline and verifying that information at the ticket counter, the TSA said, travelers who were previously inconvenienced on every trip will now be able to check in online or at remote kiosks.

As an incentive for the airlines to take action, the TSA announced plans to collect data from air carriers to determine how many cleared passengers are being forced to the ticket counters to verify their identification before being issued a boarding pass. The TSA said it is also actively exploring enforcement action against air carriers who tell passengers inaccurately that they are watch-listed. The TSA reportedly is also threatening to fine airlines up to $25,000 when they erroneously tell passengers they are on a terrorist watch list.

The TSA stated that fewer than 50,000 individuals are on the no-fly and selectee lists. Individuals on the no-fly and selectee lists are identified by law enforcement and intelligence entities as legitimate threats to transportation who require either additional screening or are prohibited from boarding an aircraft. The watch lists also include any aliases or variations an individual may use, which drives up the overall number of names on a list.

David Stempler of the Air Travelers Association was not impressed by the TSA’s blaming airlines for the problems: “Airline security should always have been a government responsibility, and deflecting criticism to the airlines is inappropriate.” The TSA is expected to assume responsibility for checking names against the lists early next year.

Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union, which calculates that there are over one million names on the list, called on the House Homeland Security Committee to exercise vigorous oversight of the Department of Homeland Security programs that “endanger U.S. citizens’ privacy and civil liberties without increasing security.”  Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office, said, “Members of Congress, nuns, war heroes and other ‘suspicious characters,’ with names like Robert Johnson and Gary Smith, have become trapped in the Kafkaesque clutches of this list, with little hope of escape.”

The TSA’s notice is available at http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/reporter_watch_list.shtm. Mr. Hawley’s testimony is available at http://www.tsa.gov/press/speeches/072408_hawley_aviation_security.shtm. Complaints may be filed online at http://www.dhs.gov/xtrvlsec/programs/gc_1169676919316.shtm. The ACLU’s statements are at http://www.aclu.org/privacy/35968prs20080714.html and http://www.aclu.org/privacy/36026prs20080717.html. The ACLU’s watch list counter is at http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/watchlistcounter.html.

Back to Top


10. USCIS Revises Biometric Instructions for Reentry Permits and Refugee Travel Documents

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued revised instructions for Form I-131, Application for Travel Document. The instructions include changes that require applicants for re-entry permits and refugee travel documents to provide biometrics (e.g., fingerprints and photographs) at a USCIS Application Support Center (ASC) for background and security checks and to meet requirements for secure travel and entry documents containing biometric identifiers.

The new instructions for the I-131 require that applicants for re-entry permits and refugee travel documents who are ages 14 through 79 provide biometrics before departing from the U.S. Applicants are strongly encouraged to apply, whenever possible, well in advance of their anticipated travel dates to allow time to attend their ASC appointments and to receive their travel documents. Shortly after filing an I-131 for a refugee travel document or a re-entry permit, USCIS will mail the applicant his or her receipt and an ASC scheduling notice. Certain overseas USICS offices may, in their discretion, accept and adjudicate an I-131 filed for a refugee travel document (but not a re-entry permit), where the applicant has failed to apply while in the U.S. Applicants for refugee travel documents should not count on the overseas offices necessarily agreeing to accept and adjudicate an I-131 in all cases, however, particularly where it is evident to the agency that the individual could have applied while in the U.S. and attended his or her biometrics appointment.

If applicants require expedited processing, the instructions provide specific information for submitting pre-paid express mailers with the I-131 for USCIS to send the applicant his or her receipt and ASC appointment notice, as well as the completed re-entry permit or refugee travel document, if approved. A request for expedited processing should contain the applicant’s reasons for such processing so that USCIS may determine whether the applicant qualifies for expedited processing.

The notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=9c1161ccdc20b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


11. USCIS Continues Suspension of Premium Processing for Religious Workers

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that the suspension of premium processing service for religious worker (R-1) nonimmigrant visa petitions will continue at least until January 7, 2009. A previous six-month suspension was announced on January 4, 2008.

The Premium Processing Service provides faster processing of certain employment-based petitions and guarantees a 15-calendar day processing time. Because of the complexities of adjudicating R-1 nonimmigrant visa petitions, USCIS said it cannot reasonably ensure a level of processing service within 15 calendar days.

On April 25, 2007, USCIS proposed significant revisions to its regulations related to the special immigrant and nonimmigrant (R-1) religious worker visa classifications. The proposed rule suggested steps to eliminate fraud in the religious worker program and discussed potential vulnerabilities addressed in an August 2005 Benefit Fraud Assessment conducted by USCIS’s Office of Fraud Detection and National Security. USCIS said it is considering comments on the proposed rule.

USCIS will continue processing R-1 nonimmigrant visa petitions, including procedures that may include inspections, evaluations, verifications, and compliance reviews for religious organizations. These procedures necessitate exceeding the 15-day guarantee for premium processing.

In the future, the agency said it may reconsider this decision if it is able to properly process these cases within 15 calendar days of receipt. USCIS may prescribe additional conditions of availability on the Premium Processing Service for religious worker petitions.

The USCIS notice is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=788bc1cacd70b110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


12. New Publications and Items of Interest

GAO: Improve passport operations. In 2007, following the implementation of new document requirements for travelers entering the U.S. from within the Western Hemisphere, the Department of State received a record number of passport applications. In June 2009 further document requirements are scheduled to go into effect and will likely lead to another surge in passport demand. In a report released on July 2008, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined (1) the extent to which the Department was prepared for the surge in passport demand and how its readiness affected passport operations, (2) the Department’s actions to increase passport production capacity in response to the surge, and (3) the Department’s readiness for near-term surges in demand and its strategy to improve passport operations.

The GAO noted that the Department was unprepared for the record number of passport applications it received in 2007, leading to significant delays. Reported wait times reached 10 to 12 weeks in the summer of 2007, more than double the normal wait, with hundreds of thousands of passports taking significantly longer. The Department had difficulty tracking individual applications and failed to effectively measure or communicate to applicants the total expected wait times, prompting many to re-apply and further straining processing capacity.

The Department took a number of emergency measures and accelerated other planned efforts to increase its passport production capacity in 2007. As a result of these efforts and the normal seasonal decline in passport applications, the GAO noted, wait times returned to normal by October 2007. According to Department estimates, these emergency measures cost $42.8 million. Although the Department has taken steps to improve its ability to respond to near-term surges in passport demand, the GAO found that the Department lacks a comprehensive strategy to improve long-term passport operations. The GAO noted that the Department previously identified several deficiencies that limited the efficiency and effectiveness of passport operations, such as reliance on a paper-based work flow and ineffective communications. The Department identified a framework to guide its modernization efforts, but the GAO concluded that it does not have a comprehensive plan to prioritize and synchronize improvements to its passport operations. A comprehensive strategy for making these improvements would better equip the Department to handle a significantly higher workload in the future, the GAO said.

The report, “State Department: Comprehensive Strategy Needed to Improve Passport Operations” (GAO-08-891), is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08891.pdf.

USCIS ombudsman 2008 recommendations. The ombudsman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has released a chart of 2008 recommendations and activity, available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb_recommendations_to_uscis_status_chart.pdf.

Article: emphasis on border control ineffective. Philip Kretsedemas, co-editor of Keeping Out the Other: A Critical Introduction to Immigration Today and professor of sociology at the University of Massachusetts, has written “What’s Different About the Immigration Problem We Face Today – And What Can Be Done About It.” The article notes that the debate about undocumented migration still “seems to be lodged in a paradigm that is organized around border control. Although this emphasis is not entirely misplaced, it also tends to produce distorted explanations of undocumented migration and ineffective strategies for controlling undocumented migration.” The article is available at http://hnn.us/articles/49469.html.

Labor certification process. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is harming the competitiveness of U.S. companies and the growth of U.S. jobs and innovation by enforcing a labor certification policy not intended by Congress and divorced from economic reality, according to a new study released by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP). The study, “Certifiable: The Department of Labor’s Approach to Labor Certification,” concludes that although the law requires labor certification for most skilled immigrants seeking a green card, the DOL has “created the current system out of whole cloth.” The study is available at http://www.nfap.com/pdf/080731laborcertification.pdf.

Back to Top


13. Recent News from ABIL Members

Steve Yale-Loehr (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) was quoted in the July 8, 2008, issue of the Los Angeles Times. The article on undocumented graduates noted that even the most prestigious academic posts have not shielded students from immigration enforcement. Dan-el Padilla Peralta, a classics scholar and Princeton salutatorian in undocumented status from the Dominican Republic, pursued a master’s degree at Oxford University and avoided possible exclusion upon his return only through an intense legal and publicity campaign, his lawyer, Mr. Yale-Loehr, said.

Steve Garfinkel (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-garfinkel.cfm) presented an Immigration Briefing on July 10, 2008, to more than 40 human resources professionals. The briefing, coordinated by The Employers Association, covered topics including practical tips on compliance, visa eligibility basics for employers, an update on verifying social security numbers and the “E-Verify” system, and recent enforcement activity.

Mr. Garfinkel has accepted an invitation to speak on immigration law issues at the North Carolina SHRM State Conference on Thursday, September 11, 2008. Steve will discuss employment-based immigration law challenges on a panel, “The Face of Immigration in America.”

Charles Kuck’s (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) recent comments were quoted in the July 24, 2008, edition of the National Law Journal. Commenting on recent actions of the Department of Labor to crack down on companies hiring foreign workers, such as auditing all current and future labor certification applications filed by Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, Mr. Kuck noted that the Department’s efforts are “incredibly unusual. You’ll definitely see more of this because of a change in leadership in the solicitor’s office at the Department of Labor.” Gregory F. Jacob was nominated for the position by President George Bush and confirmed by the Senate late last year.

Laura Danielson (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-danielson.cfm) and Poorvi Chothani (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-chothani.cfm) were quoted in an article on obtaining visas to send workers to India, available at: http://www.tcbmag.com/industriestrends/goingglobal/102280p1.aspx. Ms. Danielson noted that “[t]he novice doing business in another country that needs a permit often has no idea that it could take weeks or even months to get that documentation in order.” Ms. Chothani outlined four types of business structures acceptable in India: sole proprietorships, partnership firms, private companies, and public companies. “The foreign company can open a branch, project, or liaison office in India. An individual can obtain an employment visa to work at any of these entities,” she noted.

John Nahajzer (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-nahajzer.cfm) was listed in the 2008 edition of the International Who’s Who of Corporate Immigration Lawyers.

Steve Clark (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-clark.cfm) will be addressing the American Immigration Lawyers Association in Chicago, Illinois, on August 25, 2008, at “PERM: The New Form and The Latest Devlopments.” During the seminar, Mr. Clark will provide a walkthrough of the new Form ETA 9089 used to file labor certifications filed beginning January 1, 2009, including section-by-section changes, implementation of improvements to the form, and danger zones.

Angelo Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) has co-authored an article, “Success With L-1Bs In An Era Of Increased USCIS Scrutiny,” that was published in Mondaq. The article notes that, because of increased scrutiny, the approvability of L-1B petitions in the current environment now requires much more meticulous case preparation. The article reviews the statute, legislative history, past and current regulations and rulemaking, precedent case law, and agency policy memos that guide USCIS in its adjudication of L-1B specialized knowledge petitions. It is available at http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=64138.

Cyrus D. Mehta (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) was a presenter on July 2, 2008, at a Federal Bar Council program on asylum. His topic was taking appeals to the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Second Circuit.

Mr. Mehta co-authored an article that appeared in the July 1, 2008, issue of Bender’s Immigration Bulletin: “Home Is Where the Card Is: How To Preserve Lawful Permanent Resident Status in a Global Economy.” The article focuses on the obvious pitfalls — abandonment of permanent residence and the inability to naturalize — if an LPR opts for a career overseas, but also explores ways to minimize these pitfalls. The article also advocates a reappraisal of abandonment.

Before enactment of the new exit tax for U.S. citizens and long-term permanent residents, Steve Trow (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-trow.cfm) authored “The Exit Tax – A Perfectly Bad Idea,” which was published in Tax Notes International, and “Exit Tax: Eyeing the Turnstile Again,” in Bender’s Immigration Bulletin. Copies of these articles are available upon request from info@trowlaw.com.

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-08-01 00:00:242019-09-18 02:37:36News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 8 • August 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 7 • July 01, 2008

July 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Federal Contractors Must Use E-Verify, White House Orders – Under a new executive order, federal contractors must check the immigration status of their current and future employees through the E-Verify online employment authorization verification system.

2. CBP Issues Tips for U.S.-Canadian Border Travelers – With the onset of summer travel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection recently released tips for cross-border travelers between the U.S. and Canada.

3. USCIS To Issue Two-Year EADs for Certain LPR Applicants – The two-year EAD is available to certain pending adjustment applicants who are currently unable to adjust status because an immigrant visa number is not available.

4. USCIS Issues Supplemental Guidance on Processing Petitions Affected by AC21 and ACWIA – USCIS plans to incorporate all previous still-applicable guidance into forthcoming rulemaking relating to various AC21 and ACWIA statutory provisions.

5. USCIS Offers Premium Processing Service for Certain Immigrant Worker Petitions – USCIS will make available Premium Processing Service for designated I-140 petitions filed for H-1B nonimmigrant workers who are reaching the end of their sixth year in H-1B nonimmigrant status.

6. U.S., U.K. Border Agencies Agree to Expedite Travel Between Nations – The International Expedited Traveler Initiative will integrate CBP’s Global Entry program with the British registered traveler program.

7. Homeland Security Tech Undersecretary, Others Warn of Skills Crisis – The U.S. workforce is “in crisis” because of insufficient numbers of students going into math and science fields.

8. DOL Audits Labor Cert Applications Filed By Fragomen – The Department of Labor has decided to conduct an audit of all permanent labor certification applications filed by Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP.

9. Court Rules Del Monte Cannot Avoid Liability for Wage Violations of Contractor – A federal court ruled that Fresh Del Monte Produce Southeast, Inc., is liable for worker wage violations by a labor contractor.

10. State Dep’t Issues Final Rule To Offer Electronic Nonimmigrant Visa Applications – The Department has developed and introduced an electronic application process for nonimmigrant visas to eventually replace the current application process.

11. USCIS Closing Tijuana, Hong Kong Field Offices – USCIS released details on where applications will be forwarded and processed.

12. Federal Court Enjoins Oklahoma From Enforcing State Immigration Law – The judge found that it was “substantially likely” that Oklahoma’s law is preempted by federal immigration law.

13. State Dept. Releases Information on Employment Second and Third Preference Availability for July – The employment third preference will become unavailable in July.

14. Diversity Visa Lottery Results Announced – Those selected will need to act on their immigrant visa applications quickly.

15. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest.

16. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members.

Details:

1. Federal Contractors Must Use E-Verify, White House Orders

President Bush issued an executive order on June 9, 2008, requiring that Federal contractors check the immigration status of their current and future employees through the E-Verify online employment authorization verification system.

The order states that “adherence to the general policy of contracting only with providers that do not knowingly employ unauthorized alien workers and that have agreed to utilize an electronic employment verification system designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security to confirm the employment eligibility of their workforce will promote economy and efficiency in Federal procurement.”

The text of the executive order is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/06/print/20080609-2.html.

Back to Top

2. CBP Issues Tips for U.S.-Canadian Border Travelers

With the onset of summer travel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) recently released tips for cross-border travelers between the U.S. and Canada.

U.S. and Canadian citizens are now required to present proof of citizenship and identity to enter the U.S. at land and sea ports of entry. This may include a passport, trusted traveler program card (NEXUS), or birth certificate with a driver’s license. Travelers 18 and under may present just a birth certificate. A passport has been required for all travelers entering and departing the United States by air since January 2007.

CBP also reminded U.S. lawful permanent residents that the I-551 form (green card) is acceptable for land and sea travel into the U.S.

CBP’s tips include:

  • Tip #1 – Travelers should familiarize themselves with the “Know Before You Go” section of the CBP Web site to avoid fines and penalties associated with the importation of prohibited items. “Know Before You Go” brochures are also available at border ports of entry.
  • Tip #2 – Travelers should prepare for the inspection process before arriving at the inspection booth. Individuals should have their crossing documents available for the inspection and they should be prepared to declare all items acquired abroad. In addition, individuals should end cellular phone conversations before arriving at the inspection booth.
  • Tip #3 – Members of the traveling public should consult the CBP Web site to monitor border wait times for various ports of entry, including Blaine and Sumas, Washington; Sweetgrass, Montana; and Pembina, North Dakota. Information is updated hourly and is useful in planning trips and identifying periods of light use and short waits.
  • Tip #4 – During periods of heavy travel, border crossers may wish to consider alternative, less heavily traveled entry routes.
  • Tip #5 – Travelers should plan to build extra time into their trips in the event they cross during periods of exceptionally heavy traffic (e.g., Canada Day and the Fourth of July holidays and adjacent weekends).
  • Tip #6 – Know the difference between goods for personal use and goods for commercial use.
  • Tip #7 – Do not attempt to bring fruits, meats, dairy, poultry products, or firewood into the U.S. from Canada without first checking whether they are permitted.
  • Tip #8 – CBP officers have the authority to conduct enforcement examinations without a warrant, ranging from a simple luggage examination up to and possibly including a personal search. Even during the summer vacation season, international border crossers should continue to expect a thorough inspection process when they enter the U.S. from Canada.

CBP said its officials continually monitor traffic and border crossing times at area ports of entry. CBP plans to fully staff all inspection lanes during peak periods and to implement various traffic management operations to maintain the flow of traffic during periods of exceptionally heavy usage.

The tips are available at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/06272008.xml.

Back to Top

3. USCIS To Issue Two-Year EADs for Certain LPR Applicants

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on June 12, 2008, that certain lawful permanent resident applicants may file a Form I-765 (Application for Employment Authorization) to request a two-year employment authorization document (EAD). The two-year EAD is available to pending adjustment applicants (those who have filed a Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status) who have filed for an EAD under 8 CFR § 274.a.12(c)(9) and who are currently unable to adjust status because an immigrant visa number is not available. USCIS will continue to grant EADs that are valid for one year for adjustment applicants who have an available immigrant visa number and are filing for employment authorization under that section. The agency will decide whether to renew an EAD for either a one- or two-year validity period based on the most recent Department of State Visa Bulletin. We can anticipate that under this month’s Visa Bulletin, the only employment-based applicants to benefit from the two-year period will be in the EB-3 classification, or EB-2 applicants who are natives of China or India.

USCIS said it expects to implement this initiative for cases pending on June 30, 2008. Applicants filing an I-765 under § 274.a.12(c)(9) should begin to receive their two-year EAD several weeks after the June 30, 2008, implementation date.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/employ_auth_docs_061208.pdf. A related fact sheet is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=62ae15d3ffd7a110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top

4. USCIS Issues Supplemental Guidance on Processing Petitions Affected by AC21 and ACWIA

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released supplemental guidance on May 30, 2008, relating to processing forms I-140 (employment-based immigrant petitions), I-129 (H-1B petitions), and I-485 (adjustment of status applications) affected by the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21) and the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA). The guidance discusses a variety of issues, such as the application of several Department of Labor rules related to labor certification; documentation; H-1B petitions; and portability issues under AC21. USCIS plans to incorporate all previous still-applicable guidance into forthcoming rulemaking relating to various AC21 and ACWIA statutory provisions.

Among other things, the guidance notes that to determine an H-1B beneficiary’s eligibility for an extension of H-1B status under § 104(c) of AC21, USCIS adjudicators are instructed to review the Department of State’s Visa Bulletin that was in effect at the time of filing of the I-129 petition. If, on the date of filing of the H-1B petition, the Visa Bulletin shows that the beneficiary was subject to a per-country or worldwide visa limitation in accordance with the beneficiary’s immigrant visa priority date, the H-1B extension request under AC21 § 104(c) may be granted. To establish the priority date, USCIS may accept a copy of the H-1B beneficiary’s I-140 petition approval notice.

The guidance also notes that USCIS adjudicators are instructed that if credible documentary evidence is provided in support of an H-1B petition that the beneficiary faced retaliatory action from his or her employer based on reporting a violation of INA § 212(n)(2)(C)(iv), USCIS adjudicators may consider any related loss of H-1B status by the beneficiary as an “extraordinary circumstance.” This process may allow the beneficiary additional time to acquire new H-1B employment and remain eligible to apply for a change of status or extension of stay notwithstanding the termination of employment or other retaliatory action by the employer.

The guidance is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/AC21_30May08.pdf.

Back to Top

5. USCIS Offers Premium Processing Service for Certain Immigrant Worker Petitions

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will make available Premium Processing Service for designated Form I-140 petitions (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker) filed for H-1B nonimmigrant workers who are reaching the end of their sixth year in H-1B nonimmigrant status. Starting on June 16, 2008, USCIS is accepting Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service, for I-140s filed for beneficiaries who, as of the date of filing the I-907:

  • are currently in H-1B nonimmigrant status;
  • will reach the end of their sixth year of H-1B nonimmigrant stay in 60 days;
  • are only eligible for a further H-1B extension under § 104(c) (three-year extension provision) of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000 (AC21) upon approval of their I-140; and
  • are ineligible to extend their H-1B status under AC21 § 106(a).(i.e., failed to file a labor certification application before the end of the final year of H-1B status)

Premium Processing Service guarantees petitioners that within 15 calendar days of receipt of a petition, USCIS will issue an approval or denial notice, a notice of intent to deny, a request for evidence, or a notice of investigation for fraud or misrepresentation. Because of the limitations imposed by USCIS, relatively few people will be able to take advantage of this new announcement.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=7e3355fe4a37a110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top

6. U.S., U.K. Border Agencies Agree to Expedite Travel Between Nations

U.S. Customs and Border Protection has signed a joint agreement with the government of the United Kingdom to develop a bilateral pilot program to facilitate travel between the two nations. The International Expedited Traveler Initiative will integrate CBP’s Global Entry program with the British registered traveler program.

CBP announced the Global Entry pilot program April 11 to build upon other CBP trusted traveler programs, such as NEXUS and SENTRI, designed to facilitate and expedite the entry process for pre-registered low-risk international travelers into the U.S. NEXUS is a joint program with the Canada Border Services Agency that allows expedited processing into the U.S. and Canada at the land border and at Canadian pre-clearance airports. SENTRI provides for dedicated processing at the U.S.-Mexico land border.

The Global Entry pilot kicked off for U.S. citizens and U.S. permanent residents on June 6 at three airports: John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York; George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas; and Washington Dulles International Airport. CBP began accepting online applications on May 12. CBP expects that citizens of the United Kingdom will be invited to apply as soon as late this year. CBP signed a similar agreement with the government of the Netherlands on May 19.

The announcement is available at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/news_releases/06242008_4.xml.

Back to Top

7. Homeland Security Tech Undersecretary, Others Warn of Skills Crisis

Jay Cohen, the Department of Homeland Security Department’s undersecretary for science and technology, warned during his keynote address at a recent University of Maryland global security summit that the U.S. workforce is “in crisis” because of insufficient numbers of students going into math and science fields. Mr. Cohen said students view those topics as too difficult.

Mr. Cohen also noted that “[w]e don’t have the leadership in industry to make the sustained investment in basic and applied research because of [falling] monthly and quarterly returns.”

Among other things, Mr. Cohen noted, the U.S. government may soon sign an agreement with the European Union, which has promised an investment of 1.3 billion euros in security-related projects, including the development of new technologies.

Rep. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.) and 10 other lawmakers sent a recent letter on the same issue to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Cal.), Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), and others, asking that they reinstate a portion of U.S. competitiveness funds cut in the fiscal year 2008 omnibus appropriations bill.

Additional information about the global security summit is available at http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/ciber/globalsecurity2008/agenda.html.

Back to Top

8. DOL Audits Labor Cert Applications Filed By Fragomen

The Department of Labor has decided to conduct an audit of all permanent labor certification applications filed by Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP (Fragomen). The Department alleged that it “has information indicating that in at least some cases the firm improperly instructed clients who filed permanent labor certification applications to contact their attorney before hiring apparently qualified U.S. workers.” The audits will determine which, if any, applications should be denied or placed into department-supervised recruitment “because of improper attorney involvement in the consideration of U.S. worker applicants,” the Department said.

Fragomen responded in a statement released on its Web site that “DOL, by its audit, seeks to limit the right to counsel. In order to make its point, DOL presses to make a radical departure from past practice and create a new regulatory interpretation which would limit the role of employers’ attorneys and bar them from giving guidance on specific fact situations.” Fragomen noted “widespread outrage” in the business community and in the immigration bar at the Department’s “unprecedented sweeping audit and its misinterpretation of the law.” Also voicing support, Fragomen noted, are the American Immigration Lawyers Association, “which ha[s] challenged and criticized DOL’s new interpretation and also the manner in which it has publicly announced the audits,” and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Fragomen said it is working to reach an agreement “that will enable us to move forward quickly to a resolution and have DOL release cases from audit in the near future, so cases will be back on track in the routine process.”

The Department of Labor’s announcement is available at http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/eta20080752.htm. Fragomen’s statement is available at http://pubweb.fdbl.com/news1.nsf/9abe5d703b986cff86256e310080943a/13b637d2e0930e1d852574750003a7d6?OpenDocument. Fragomen’s update is available at http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/2008,0630-fragomen.pdf. See also http://mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=62392.

Back to Top

9. Court Rules Del Monte Cannot Avoid Liability for Wage Violations of Contractor

A federal court ruled that Fresh Del Monte Produce Southeast, Inc., is liable for worker wage violations by a labor contractor. The lawsuit was filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in April 2006 on behalf of up to 500 field and factory H-2A agricultural workers working in Georgia on planting, harvesting, and packaging onions.

Mary Bauer, director of the SPLC’s Immigrant Justice Project, said the decision was particularly significant “because it provides a roadblock to a disturbing trend by large corporate growers that import workers. Increasingly, those corporations attempt to evade responsibility for their workers by having middlemen — generally penniless crew leaders — submit the applications for H-2A workers, instead of the wealthy corporations doing so themselves.”

Additional information about the case, Luna v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, is available at http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=304.

Back to Top

10. State Dep’t Issues Final Rule To Offer Electronic Nonimmigrant Visa Applications

The Department of State has issued a final rule, effective April 29, 2008, to offer a completely electronic application procedure for nonimmigrant visas as an alternative to submission of the Form DS-156.

The Department has developed and introduced an electronic application process for nonimmigrant visas to eventually replace the current application process, which depends on a paper form (the DS-156, and other forms when required, such as the DS-157 and DS-158). The first step in paper reduction efforts was to offer an electronic visa application form (EVAF) as a voluntary alternative way of obtaining and preparing the DS-156. While a nonimmigrant visa applicant could obtain and prepare the DS-156 electronically, he or she was required to sign the DS-156 manually.

On October 1, 2006, the EVAF was made mandatory worldwide wherever possible. Now, although the Department will continue to accept the EVAF where necessary, it plans to eventually eliminate the DS-156 entirely and replace it with the DS-160, an electronic form designed to be completed and signed electronically. The procedure is the same for the nonimmigrant visa applicant except that he or she will not be required to print and sign a form to take to the visa interview. All information entered into the DS-160 will be available to the consular officer at the time of the interview. The applicant is required to “sign” the DS-160 electronically.

The full text of the final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/E8-9336.htm.

Back to Top

11. USCIS Closing Tijuana, Hong Kong Field Offices

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on June 18, 2008, that it is closing its Tijuana and Hong Kong field offices.

Details on where applications sent to the Tijuana office will be forwarded and processed are at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=29b534a30f49a110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Details on where applications sent to the Hong Kong office will be forwarded and processed are at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=a70af774c6c9a110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top

12. Federal Court Enjoins Oklahoma From Enforcing State Immigration Law

On June 4, 2008, a federal court in Oklahoma City enjoined Oklahoma from enforcing portions of the state’s immigration law, H.B. 1804, that were scheduled to take effect July 1. Among them were a requirement that employers use E-Verify to check work authorizations of employees, which is currently voluntary for private employers under federal law. Judge Robin J. Cauthron found that it was “substantially likely” that Oklahoma’s law is preempted by federal immigration law. The lawsuit was filed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other groups.

The court noted that:

[W]hile the public clearly has an interest in issues of illegal immigration, and no court should treat the prospect of overturning state law without grave consideration, the Constitution requires that the will of the States must occasionally give way to the need for uniformity among the States, and that uniformity can only be accomplished through congressional action. Thus, for now, the provisions of H.B. 1804 challenged by Plaintiffs must be enjoined until a final determination can be made about the extent to which States can permissibly regulate without interfering with areas reserved exclusively for congressional action. The Court is not deciding that Plaintiffs will ultimately prevail, rather, when the materials before the Court are viewed as the facts and law exist today, it appears that Plaintiffs are likely to prevail and consequently are entitled to a preliminary injunction.

The decision is available at http://www.uschamber.com/assets/nclc/henrypreliminjunction.pdf. For additional details and a history of the case, see http://www.nfib.com/object/IO_37522.html and http://hr.cch.com/news/employment/062008a.asp.

Back to Top

13. State Dept. Releases Information on Employment Second and Third Preference Availability for July

The Department of State’s Visa Office has released the following information on employment second and third preference visa number availability for July 2008:

Employment second preference. The Department noted that questions have been raised regarding the way visa numbers have been provided to China and India in the employment second preference categories beginning in April. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, if total demand for visas in an employment preference category is insufficient to use all available visa numbers in that category in a calendar quarter, the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limit, the Department noted. For example, if the second preference annual limit were 40,000, number use by “All Other Countries” were estimated to be only 25,000, and the China/India combined number use based on their per-country limits were 6,000, there would be 9,000 numbers unused. Those 9,000 numbers could then be made available to China and India applicants without regard to their per-country limits.

The Department determined that the demand from “All Other Countries” for second preference numbers, plus the quantity of numbers available under the China and India second preference per-country limit, would be insufficient to use all available numbers under the annual limit for this category. Therefore, the unused numbers have been made available to China and India second preference applicants. Because such unused numbers must be made available strictly in priority date order, the China and India applicants have been subject to the same cut-off date as worldwide applicants. As there are more employment second preference applicants from India and the Indian applicants may have earlier priority dates, the Department said it is likely that Indian applicants will receive a larger portion of the available numbers than Chinese applicants.

The employment second preference category is “Current” for all countries except China and India. If at any point it appears to the Department that demand from “All Other Countries” would use all available numbers, an adjustment would be made to the China/India cut-off date. Therefore, providing the unused numbers to China and India “in no way disadvantages applicants from any other country, and helps to insure that the worldwide annual limit can be reached,” the Department noted.

Employment third preference. Demand for numbers, primarily by USCIS for adjustment of status cases, has brought the entire employment third preference category to the annual numerical limit by the end of June. As a result, this category will become “unavailable” beginning in July and will remain so for the remainder of fiscal year 2008, the Department said. Such action will be temporary, and employment third preference availability will return to the cut-off dates established for June in October, the first month of the new fiscal year.

The latest Visa Bulletin containing this and other information on priority dates is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4252.html.

Back to Top

14. Diversity Visa Lottery Results Announced

The Department of State’s Visa Office has reported that the Kentucky Consular Center in Williamsburg, Kentucky, has registered and notified the winners of the DV-2009 diversity lottery. The DV lottery makes available 50,000 permanent resident visas annually to persons from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. Over 9.1 million people applied for the DV lottery this year. Of that number, approximately 99,600 applicants have been registered and notified and may now make an application for an immigrant visa. Because it is likely that some of the first 50,000 persons registered will not pursue their cases to visa issuance, the Department said this larger figure should ensure that all DV-2009 numbers will be used during fiscal year 2009 (October 1, 2008, to September 30, 2009). Those selected will need to act on their immigrant visa applications quickly. Applicants should follow the instructions in their notification letter and must fully complete the information requested.

The latest Visa Bulletin for July 2008 contains a country-by-country breakdown of those registered for DV-2009, at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4252.html.

Back to Top

15. New Publications and Items of Interest

New USCIS ombudsman postings:

  • Questions & Answers from CIS Ombudsman’s Teleconferences – updated 6/16/2008
  • N-648 Medical Waivers – How Are They Working For You? – updated 6/11/2008

These items are available at http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/editorial_0482.shtm.

Globalization links. The University of Maryland’s Center for International Business Education and Research has posted a number of links to information about globalization, trade, merging economies, and American competitiveness at http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/ciber/resources.html.

DOJ Inspector General report on name check and fingerprint processes. The Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General has released “The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Security Check Procedures for Immigration Applications and Petitions” (Audit Report 08-24, June 2008). The report notes that the FBI’s largest name check and fingerprint identification user is the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, for use in adjudications of immigration and naturalization benefits. The volume of requests for name checks and fingerprint identification has surged since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. More than 4 million name checks were performed in fiscal year (FY) 2007, and 26 million fingerprint identification requests were made in FY 2007. The Inspector General’s audit found that the FBI’s name check processes performed under the National Name Check Program (NNCP) are “inefficient and untimely, rely on outdated technology, and provide little assurance that pertinent and derogatory information is being retrieved and transmitted to customer agencies.” The Inspector General found, however, that the fingerprint identification process performed under the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) is generally “accurate and timely” because of enhanced technology, well-trained personnel, efficient tracking mechanisms, and proficient interaction with requesting agencies.

The DOJ Inspector General’s report is available at http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a0824/final.pdf.

DOL Inspector General report on labor certification applications. The Department of Labor’s Inspector General issued a semiannual report to Congress on May 31, 2008, recommending that Congress authorize the Department to verify information on labor certification applications. The report stated that “[i]f DOL is to have a meaningful role in the H-1B specialty occupations foreign labor certification process, it must have the statutory authority to ensure the integrity of that process, including the ability to verify the accuracy of information provided on labor condition applications.” The Department recommends consideration with USCIS of a legislative proposal that would “require foreign nationals to have their eligibility determined by USCIS before the employer’s labor certification application is reviewed by DOL.”

The DOL Inspector General’s report is available at http://op.bna.com/dlrcases.nsf/r?Open=gcii-7falst.

Back to Top

16. Recent News from ABIL Members

Charles Kuck (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) was recently elected President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) for the 2008-2009 term. Mr. Kuck is Managing Partner of Kuck Casablanca LLC. He has served on the National Executive Committee of AILA for five years. Previously, Mr. Kuck served in a variety of executive capacities for AILA, notably on the Board of Governors of AILA, Chair of the Atlanta Chapter of AILA, and National Chair of the Young Lawyers Division of AILA. He previously served on various other committees for AILA. Mr. Kuck also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Georgia School of Law.

Bernard P. Wolfsdorf (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-wolfsdorf.cfm) was recently elected President-Elect of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) for the 2008-2009 term. Previously, he was AILA’s National Second Vice President. He is the founding partner of the Wolfsdorf Immigration Law Group. He has been a State Bar of California Certified Specialist in Immigration and Nationality Law for over 20 years.

Kehrela Hodkinson (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-hodkinson.cfm) received a Presidential Award at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s annual conference in Vancouver, British Columbia, for “Outstanding Efforts in Leading the Development of the Rome District Chapter.”

Sharon Mehlman (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehlman.cfm) received a Presidential Award at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s annual conference in Vancouver, British Columbia, for “Outstanding Service as Chair of the USCIS Centers Operations Committee (SCOPS) and Her Tireless Efforts in Resolving Service Center Issues.”

Several members of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) spoke at the AILA conference (http://www.aila.org/content/fileviewer.aspx?docid=24313&linkid=173260):

  • Steven Clark, Navigating the New ETA-9089: How Has The Course Changed?
  • Steven Garfinkel, Lawyer as Employer (Practice Management Issues)
  • H. Ronald Klasko, Dealing With the Eternal Adjustment Applicant
  • Charles Kuck, Presidential Installation Speech, discussion leader for Interagency Government Panel, New Attendees Orientation, discussion leader for “Affidavit of Support Game Show.”
  • Sharon Mehlman, USCIS Open Forum
  • Cyrus Mehta, Preserving Permanent Residence
  • Angelo Paparelli, PERM Workshop, Investor Seminar: Best Practices in EB-1 and EB-5 Risk Management, ICE Raid Workshop, Part III: Corporate Compliance Progress
  • William Reich, Tricky TNs: Hints and Hazards
  • Bernard Wolfsdorf, Update on E Investor Visas; Hot Topics

ABIL member bios are posted at http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers.cfm and http://www.abil.com/lawyers/abil_global.cfm.

Many ABIL members have been listed in the 2008 edition of the International Who’s Who of Corporate Immigration Lawyers, which has just been published. Those listed include Francis Chin, Steven A. Clark, Laura J. Danielson, Bryan Funai, Steven Garfinkel, Kehrela Hodkinson, Mark Ivener, H. Ronald Klasko, Charles Kuck, Edward Litwin, Sharon Mehlman, Cyrus Mehta, Angelo Paparelli, Julie Pearl, William Reich, Steve Trow, Bernard Wolfsdorf, and Stephen Yale-Loehr. ABIL member bios are posted at http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers.cfm and http://www.abil.com/lawyers/abil_global.cfm.

Angelo A. Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) recently co-wrote an article with Ted Chiappari that appeared in the June 23, 2008, issue of the New York Law Journal. The article examines recent actions by the U.S. Department of Labor, an agency with a key role in administering the immigration laws, restricting the role of lawyers in the employment-based immigration process, including the blanket audit of every labor certification application filed by numerous Fortune 500 companies all represented by the same law firm (Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy LLP). The article is available by subscription to the New York Law Journal, from http://www.lawcatalog.com/product_detail.cfm?productID=1007&setlist=0&return=listview&.

Mr. Paparelli, who is the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers president, was quoted on National Public Radio’s “Morning Edition” as noting that the presidential candidates’ positions on immigration “are as distinct as Tweedledum’s from Tweedledee’s.” He noted, however, that immediate action on immigration issues is unlikely during a first McCain or Obama term: “Immigration has been described as the third rail of American politics, but more vividly by some as a downed power line that anyone who touches it will be electrified.” The full story is available at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91323073. The audio is available at http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=91323073&m=91342907.

In addition to the AILA Conference, Mr. Paparelli was a speaker or panelist in a variety of presentations in June 2008. He was videotaped in an interview by Mike Bako of Speaking Channel TV, New York; he spoke at the ACIP Annual Symposium in Pentagon City on “New Corporate Organization = New Visa?”; he was a panelist at ABIL’s EB-5 teleconference; he was interviewed by Helen Laube of Financial Times/Germany on “Immigration and the Presidential Campaign”; and he was a speaker at the ACIP teleconference on “Crimes and Misdemeanors – Their Impact on Your Employees’ Immigration Status.”

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-07-01 00:00:502019-09-18 02:43:08News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 7 • July 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 6 • June 01, 2008

June 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. DHS Issues Supplemental Q&A on OPT Interim Rule for F-1 Students – Among other things, the supplemental Q&A discusses the e-mail notification process allowing an employer whose pending H-1B petition on behalf of an F-1 student was randomly selected to receive an H-1B visa number for FY 2009 to request change of status in lieu of consular processing, as originally indicated on the petition.

2. E-Verify Update: Naturalization, Arrival Data Incorporated – A series of enhancements to E-Verify are intended to improve the accuracy of the system’s automatic confirmation processes.

3. USCIS Plans to Propose Halting Concurrent I-140, I-485 Filings – USCIS plans to propose disallowing concurrent filings of the Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status with the Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker.

4. USCIS Announces Proposed Rule To Increase Periods of Stay for TN Professionals From Canada, Mexico – The proposal would extend the maximum period of admission for Trade NAFTA workers from one year to three years

5. Arizona Governor Signs Bill Amending Arizona Workers Act, Vetoes Bill Requiring Local Immigration Enforcement – An Arizona employer’s business license may not be suspended or revoked if an employee hired before January 1, 2008, is an undocumented worker.

6. Largest-Ever Immigration Raid Results in Nearly 400 Arrests, Lawsuit – Almost 400 people were arrested at Agriprocessors in Postville, Iowa.

7. Laptops, Storage Devices May Undergo Scrutiny At Border – The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the federal government has discretion to search a laptop or other personal electronic storage device at the border.

8. USCIS Ombudsman Recommends Clarification of Fee Refund Procedures – Once a refund has been requested at a field or district office, there is no way to follow up on the request or to determine the component within the office that is processing the request.

9. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

10. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members

11. Government Agency Links – Government Agency Links

 

Details:

1. DHS Issues Supplemental Q&A on OPT Interim Rule for F-1 Students

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued supplemental questions and answers (Q&A) on an interim final rule, effective April 8, 2008, that extends the maximum period of optional practical training (OPT) from 12 months to 29 months for F-1 students who have completed a science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) degree and accept employment with employers enrolled in U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS’) E-Verify employment verification program. Currently, F-1 students who have been enrolled on a full-time basis for at least one full academic year in a certified college, university, conservatory, or seminary are eligible for 12 months of OPT to work for a U.S. employer in a job directly related to the student’s major area of study.

Among other things, the supplemental Q&A notes that on April 18, 2008, USCIS announced an e-mail notification process allowing a petitioner whose pending H-1B petition on behalf of an F-1 student was randomly selected to receive an H-1B visa number for fiscal year (FY) 2009 to request change of status in lieu of consular processing, as originally indicated on the petition. Because some FY 2009 H-1B petitions for these students already may have been approved for consular processing when USCIS published this e-mail notification process, the Q&A asks: Can the petitioner still request change of status? The answer is yes. The Q&A states that the petitioner should send an e-mail to the USCIS service center that issued the approval, using the designated e-mail address (below). Such requests must include the H-1B receipt number, as well as the petitioner’s and the beneficiary’s names.

If the H-1B petition and change of status application are pending, the change of status request should be submitted to the center within 30 days of the receipt notice. In addition to including the receipt number and the name of the petitioner and beneficiary, the Q&A notes, the request also should include the beneficiary’s date of birth, I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) number, and Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) number.

Separate e-mail addresses have been established for premium and non-premium processing cases:

Vermont Service Center

Premium processing cases: VSCPPCAPGAP.Vscppcapgap@dhs.gov
Non-premium cases: VSCNONPPCAPGAP.Vscnonppcapgap@dhs.gov

California Service Center

Premium processing cases: CSC.ppcapgap@dhs.gov
Non-premium cases: CSC.nonppcapgap@dhs.gov

The second supplemental Q&A is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/supplemental_opt_052308.pdf. The first supplemental Q&A is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/OPT_4Apr08.pdf. The interim rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-7427.pdf.

 

Back to Top

2. E-Verify Update: Naturalization, Arrival Data Incorporated

Any participating company in the U.S. can access E-Verify through a government Web site that compares employee information taken from the employment authorization verification form (I-9) with more than 444 million records in the Social Security Administration (SSA) database, and more than 60 million records in Department of Homeland Security immigration databases.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) claims that 99.5 percent of all work-authorized employees queried through E-Verify were verified without receiving a mismatch notice (Tentative Non-Confirmation (TNC)) or having to take any type of corrective action. This statistic is at odds with the view of many immigration advocates. Angela Kelley, director of the Immigration Policy Center, has noted that “[a]lmost 10 percent of naturalized citizens have received notifications about some error in their data since many of them, after their naturalization, don’t notify the Social Security [Administration] of their new citizenship status.” The New York Times said in an editorial on May 12 that “the Social Security database is rotten with errors” and the system “could force millions of Americans to battle a computerized bureaucracy that tells them, unjustly, that they cannot work.” The editorial also cites “evidence of employers abusing E-Verify” by “forcing workers who are tentatively flagged as unauthorized to take pay cuts or work longer hours until they can clear their names.”

USCIS says that employees whose work authorization cannot be instantly verified may work with SSA or USCIS, as appropriate, to confirm their work authorization. USCIS estimates that one percent of all queried employees choose to contest an initial, tentative result from E-Verify, and only half of those who contest that result are ultimately found to be authorized.

A series of enhancements, intended to improve the accuracy of the system’s automatic confirmation processes, was recently announced. USCIS said the E-Verify system will begin to include naturalization data, noting that naturalized citizens who have not yet updated their records with the SSA are the largest category of work-authorized persons who initially face an SSA mismatch in E-Verify. A naturalized citizen who receives a citizenship mismatch with SSA may call USCIS to resolve the issue, in addition to the option of resolving the mismatch in person at any SSA field office.

E-Verify also will now include real-time arrival data from the Integrated Border Inspection System. This additional data source is expected to reduce the number of immigration status-related mismatches for newly arriving workers.

USCIS also plans to initiate citizenship status records information-sharing with SSA to further prevent mismatches from occurring. E-Verify also plans to use checks against Department of State passport records in the near future.

More than 64,000 employers nationally participate in E-Verify, with approximately 1,000 new enrollments weekly. E-Verify evolved from the Basic Pilot/Employment Eligibility Verification Program originally developed in 1997 and made available to employers as a Web-based system in 2004. USCIS operates the program in partnership with SSA.

Related notices are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f55d1443719b9110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD and http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=bca6fa693660a110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Information on E-Verify and work authorization is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=1914c9676d006110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=1847c9ee2f82b010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top

 

3. USCIS Plans to Propose Halting Concurrent I-140, I-485 Filings

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) plans to propose disallowing concurrent filings of the I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status) with the I-140 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker), and instead mandate that a worker applying for adjustment of status be the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition before filing the adjustment application.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) plans to propose disallowing concurrent filings of the I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status) with the I-140 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker), and instead mandate that a worker applying for adjustment of status be the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition before filing the adjustment application.

Back to Top

4. USCIS Announces Proposed Rule To Increase Periods of Stay for TN Professionals From Canada, Mexico

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on May 9, 2008, to increase the maximum amount of time a Trade NAFTA (TN) professional worker from Canada or Mexico can remain in the U.S. before seeking readmission or obtaining an extension of stay. The proposal would extend the maximum period of admission for TN workers from one year to three years, the same term that USCIS currently may grant to H-1B specialty occupation workers.

The proposed rule would further allow eligible TN nonimmigrants to be granted an extension of stay in increments of up to three years, as opposed to the current maximum of one year. TN nonimmigrants are not subject to a maximum period of stay and thus may seek multiple readmissions or extensions, provided their intended professional activity continues and they remain otherwise eligible. Current regulations require that TN workers seek readmission or apply for an extension of stay each year.

Canadian and Mexican citizens seeking temporary entry to the U.S. as professionals may come into the country as TN nonimmigrants under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). TN status is available to Canadian and Mexican citizens with a minimum of a bachelor’s degree, or appropriate professional credentials, who work in professions listed in Appendix 1603.D.1 to Annex 1603 of the NAFTA and under DHS regulations at 8 CFR 214.6(c). Eligible TN professions include, but are not limited to, accountants, engineers, attorneys, pharmacists, scientists, and teachers.

USCIS said the rule is intended to ease administrative burdens and costs on TN nonimmigrants and will benefit U.S. employers. The proposed changes also would apply to spouses and unmarried, minor children of TN nonimmigrants in their corresponding nonimmigrant classifications as NAFTA dependents.

Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers members have observed that the rule would lessen the burden on TNs who are in the permanent residence process who may fear difficulties in extending their TN status, which must be temporary, ending “at a predictable time.” This was not a problem when TN employers could time the filing of the immigrant petition to coincide with the foreign worker’s permanent residence application. This is no longer possible: immigrant petitions must now be filed within 180 days of approval of the labor certification under the Department of Labor’s “Anti-Fraud” rule. The additional two years allowable as a TN under this proposed rule will allow more “elbow room” to file all critical phases of the process without the needing to extend the TN stay, ABIL notes. However, the benefits could be undermined by the proposed halt of concurrent I-140 and I-485 filing because this will add to the time required for permanent residence processing.

The NPRM is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-10343.pdf. Persons wishing to comment may access the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal and follow the instructions for submitting comments. USCIS will accept public comments until June 9, 2008.

Back to Top

5. Arizona Governor Signs Bill Amending Arizona Workers Act, Vetoes Bill Requiring Local Immigration Enforcement

On May 1, 2008, Governor Janet Napolitano of Arizona signed into law amendments to the Legal Arizona Workers Act (LAWA). The amendments (H.B. 2745) specify that an Arizona employer’s business license may not be suspended or revoked if an employee hired before January 1, 2008, is an undocumented worker. In other ways, the amendments expand LAWA; for example, by including undocumented independent contractors among those an employer must not knowingly hire.

In other news, Governor Napolitano vetoed a bill (H.B. 2807) that would have required local law enforcement to work with federal authorities to address immigration violations. “House Bill 2807 is simply an unnecessary, unfunded mandate to law enforcement,” she wrote.

A lawsuit challenging LAWA is on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco. For more information on the lawsuit, see http://www.nilc.org/immsemplymnt/state_local/essl002.htm.

Back to Top

6. Largest-Ever Immigration Raid Results in Nearly 400 Arrests, Lawsuit

Almost 400 people were arrested on May 12, 2008, by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at Agriprocessors Inc. in Postville, Iowa. Of the 389 people arrested at the slaughterhouse and meatpacking plant, 297 pleaded guilty and were sentenced on federal felony charges. U.S. Attorney Matt Dummermuth said that “[b]ased on the number of criminal convictions, this is the largest criminal worksite enforcement operation ever in the United States.”

Among others, 230 defendants were sentenced to five months in prison and three years of supervision for using false identification to obtain employment after admitting to using an actual person’s identity; and 30 defendants were sentenced to five months in prison and three years of supervision for falsely using a social security number or card after admitting to using an actual person’s social security.

A lawsuit was filed on behalf of almost 150 of the workers, reportedly accusing the government of arbitrary and indefinite detention and seeking to prevent the government from moving them out of state while their cases are being processed.

The ICE-led, multi-agency investigation is ongoing. A press release announcing the raid and convictions is available at http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/080515waterloo.htm. Additional information about the lawsuit is available at http://www.nydailynews.com/latino/2008/05/16/2008-05-16_federal_classaction_lawsuit_filed_in_iow.html and http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080517/NEWS/805170337.

Back to Top

7. Laptops, Storage Devices May Undergo Scrutiny At Border

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held on April 21, 2008 (U.S. v. Arnold) that the federal government has discretion to search a laptop or other personal electronic storage device at the border. The court concluded that “reasonable suspicion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other personal electronic storage devices at the border,” noting that “Arnold has failed to distinguish how the search of his laptop and its electronic contents is logically any different from the suspicionless border searches of travelers’ luggage that the Supreme Court and we have allowed.”

In the brief for amici curiae, the Association of Corporate Travel Executives (ACTE) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) noted that although laptop searches by border agents have raised increasing concerns during the last year, they still come as a surprise to most travelers. The brief notes that in an October 2006 survey of business travel managers, ACTE found that only six percent of the managers knew that border agents randomly search, seize, and copy the contents of travelers’ computers, and only one percent had received reports from travelers that their laptops had been seized by U.S. border officials. The survey results showed that “even very experienced business travelers are completely surprised to learn that the U.S. government conducts these searches and seizures randomly,” the brief noted.

ACTE and EFF noted the “wide ranging implications of the government’s arguments.” Indeed, they said, under the government’s reasoning, border authorities could systematically collect all of the information contained on every laptop computer, BlackBerry, and other electronic device carried across our national borders by every traveler, American or foreign. “The government could then store and search all of this information without justification and without oversight from the courts.” The Fourth Amendment simply does not apply. “If accepted, the government’s argument will establish an end run around the Constitution’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

While this issue remains unresolved, travelers handling sensitive information for corporations or clients may wish to work remotely online using a leased computer, or e-mail information, rather than storing it on a laptop and carrying it across the border. Even a BlackBerry could pose a serious breach of privacy if carried during international travel.

The opinion is available at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/coa/newopinions.nsf/6D5D931898D8168188257432005AC9B8/$file/0650581.pdf?openelement. The brief for amici curiae is available at http://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/US_v_arnold/arnold_amicus.pdf.

Back to Top

8. USCIS Ombudsman Recommends Clarification of Fee Refund Procedures

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) ombudsman, Michael Dougherty, has recommended that the agency clarify its fee refund procedures and revise the Adjudicator’s Field Manual accordingly. Mr. Dougherty further recommended that USCIS provide a way to track the status of refunds.

Currently, applicants may claim a refund either by calling a toll-free number or by making a written request to their local USCIS office. Mr. Dougherty said he has heard concerns that USCIS has no clear procedure for requesting a refund of fees. Once a refund has been requested at a field or district office, he noted, there is no way to follow up on the request or to determine the component within the office that is processing the request. In some cases, USCIS employees were themselves unsure of the agency’s refund procedures.

The full text of the ombudsman’s recommendation is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisombudsman_uscis_recommendation_refund_of_fees_4-8-08.pdf.

Back to Top

9. New Publications and Items of Interest

USCIS genealogy program. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services published a final rule on May 15, 2008, effective August 13, 2008, that establishes a fee-for-service Genealogy Program “to streamline and improve the process for acquiring historical records of deceased individuals.” The rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-10651.pdf.

Immigration enforcement actions in 2006. The Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Immigration Statistics recently released 2006 statistics on immigration enforcement actions. The agency noted that in 2006, it apprehended more than 1.2 million foreign nationals, of whom 88 percent were natives of Mexico. In that year, there were 8,778 Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office of Investigations criminal arrests and 6,872 convictions for immigration-related crimes. Also in 2006, ICE detained approximately 257,000 foreign nationals and removed 272,389. The leading countries of origin of those removed were Mexico (67 percent), Honduras (10 percent), and Guatemala (7 percent). Over 1 million other foreign nationals accepted an offer to return to their home countries without a removal order. Expedited removals accounted for 110,147, or 40 percent, of all removals in 2006, and DHS removed 95,752 known criminals.

The report is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/enforcement_ar_06.pdf.

Back to Top

10. Recent News from ABIL Members

Steve Clark (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-clark.cfm), Managing Shareholder at Flynn & Clark, P.C., will be addressing the American Immigration Lawyers Association at the Annual Immigration Conference in Vancouver, British Columbia, on the new PERM form and the anti-fraud rule governing labor certifications. The conference will take place on June 25-28, 2008. Steve was recognized as a Most Valuable Player by the Boston Bar Association for his work as Co-Chair of its Immigration Committee.

Several ABIL members recently addressed over 75 corporate human resources managers and relocation specialists at a program co-sponsored by the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers and the Bay Area Professionals in Relocation Management.  Charles H. Kuck (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-kuck.cfm) and Bernard P. Wolfsdorf  (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-wolfsdorf.cfm) presented on legislative and agency updates, lobbying efforts, and predictions for the next administration.  They covered recent and expected regulatory changes impacting employers and discussed anticipated and pending legislative proposals and congressional actions.  H. Ronald Klasko (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm), Sharon Mehlman (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehlman.cfm) and Angelo A. Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm) discussed ‘hot” business immigration topics, where they offered strategies for H-1B winners and losers and examined the E-Verify program and the impact of state and local laws on immigration matters.  Laura J. Danielson (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-danielson.cfm) and Kehrela M. Hodkinson (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-hodkinson.cfm) spoke about global immigration and advised on factors that companies may encounter when going global.The information from the seminar is available at https://secure31.hostek.net/abil-com/events/event.cfm

Back to Top

11. Government Agency Links

Follow these links to access current processing times of the USCIS Service Centers and the Department of Labor, or the Department of State’s latest Visa Bulletin with the most recent cut-off dates for visa numbers:

USCIS Service Center processing times online: https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/ptimes.jsp

Department of Labor processing times and information on backlogs: http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/times.cfm

Department of State Visa Bulletin: http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-06-01 00:00:222019-09-18 02:51:25News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 6 • June 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 5 • May 01, 2008

May 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. H-1B Roundup: Cap Reached, Random Selection Completed; Some Applications ‘Wait-Listed’ – USCIS announced a preliminary number of nearly 163,000 H-1B petitions received during the filing period ending on April 7, 2008.

2. DHS Issues Interim Rule on Optional Practical Training for F-1 Students – DHS issued an interim final rule extending the maximum period of OPT from 12 to 29 months for F-1 students who have completed a STEM degree and accept employment with employers enrolled in E-Verify.

3. USCIS Revises I-765 To Add F-1 Eligibility Codes – USCIS has revised the Application for Employment Authorization to include additional eligibility codes under the DHS’s interim final rule regarding OPT.

4. DOS Issues Annual Guidance on Students and Exchange Visitors – The Department of State has released a cable regarding student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) issues.

5. USCIS Releases Processing Times for Naturalization Applications Filed During Summer 2007 – Projected processing times at the end of September 2008 range from a high of 14.7 months for Washington, D.C., to a low of 5 months for Helena, Montana.

6. DHS Proposes Biometric Airport and Seaport Exit Procedures – The US-VISIT exit proposal would require non-U.S. citizens who provide biometric identifiers for admission to provide digital fingerprints when departing the country from any air or sea ports of departure.

7. ICE Arrests Hundreds of Workers – In April, ICE agents arrested hundreds of undocumented workers, including more than 300 workers at Pilgrim’s Pride plants in five states who are suspected of committing identity theft and other criminal violations to obtain their jobs.

8. DHS Signs Visa Waiver Agreement With Korea – The security enhancements outlined in the agreement put Korea on the path toward visa-free travel to the U.S. and potential designation as a VWP member as early as later this year.

9. House Holding Series of Immigration Hearings – An oversight hearing on the H-2B program was the first in a series of immigration hearings to be held by the House immigration subcommittee and the full Judiciary Committee.

10. Expensive Virtual Border Fence To Be Replaced – Customs and Border Protection officials recently acknowledged that the “Project 28” pilot program is not working sufficiently.

11. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

12. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. H-1B Roundup: Cap Reached, Random Selection Completed; Some Applications ‘Wait-Listed’

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on April 8, 2008, that it had received enough H-1B petitions to meet the congressionally mandated cap for fiscal year (FY) 2009. USCIS announced a preliminary number of nearly 163,000 H-1B petitions received during the filing period ending on April 7, 2008. More than 31,200 of those petitions were for the advanced degree exemption. On April 14, USCIS conducted the computer-generated random selection process to select which H-1B petitions for FY 2009 will continue to full adjudication. If approved, those H-1B petitions will be eligible to receive an H-1B visa number.

USCIS conducted two random selections, first on petitions qualifying for the 20,000 “master’s or higher degree” (advanced degree) exemption, and second on the remaining advance degree petitions together with the general H-1B pool of petitions, for the 65,000 cap.

The approximately 163,000 petitions received on the first five days of the eligible filing period for FY 2009 (April 1 through April 7, 2008) were labeled with unique numerical identifiers. USCIS has notified the appropriate service centers which numerical identifiers have been randomly selected, so each center may continue processing the petitions associated with those identifiers.

Petitioners whose properly filed petitions have been selected for full adjudication should receive a receipt notice dated no later than June 2, 2008. USCIS will return unselected petitions with the fee(s) to petitioners or their authorized representatives. As previously announced, duplicate filings will be returned without the fee. The total adjudication process is expected to take approximately eight to 10 weeks.

For cases selected through the random selection process and initially filed for premium processing, the 15-day premium processing period began on April 14, the day of the random selection process.

USCIS has “wait-listed” some H-1B petitions, meaning they could replace petitions chosen to receive an FY 2009 cap number but that subsequently are denied, withdrawn, or otherwise found ineligible. USCIS will retain these petitions until a decision is made whether they will replace a previously selected petition. USCIS said it will send a letter to the wait-list petitioners to inform them of their status. USCIS expects that for each of these wait-listed petitions, it will either issue a receipt notice or return the petition with fees by early to mid-June.

USCIS also announced that, with several exceptions, it will not reject an H-1B petition subject to the fiscal year 2009 cap solely on the grounds that it was received at the wrong service center (e.g., the petition may have been inadvertently mailed to the California Service Center instead of the Vermont Service Center or vice versa). This does not apply if the petitions were sent to the Texas or Nebraska Service Centers.

USCIS said it was taking this “limited, short-term measure to alleviate concerns from the public where an H-1B petition has been received by USCIS but at the incorrect Service Center.” This measure applies only to H-1B petitions subject to the FY 2009 cap that were received by USCIS before the close of business on the final receipt date.

The announcement that the H-1B cap has been reached is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/H-1B_8Apr08.pdf. The announcement about the random selection process is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/Update_USCIS_Runs_H1-B_Random_Selection%20Process.pdf. The announcement of the preliminary number of H-1B petitions received is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/USCIS%20Update_H1B_Preliminary%20Count1_10Apr08.pdf. The announcement about USCIS’s policy regarding receipt at the wrong service center is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/H-1B_Filing_4Apr08.pdf.

Back to Top


2. DHS Issues Interim Rule on Optional Practical Training for F-1 Students

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued an interim final rule, effective April 8, 2008, that extends the maximum period of optional practical training (OPT) from 12 months to 29 months for F-1 students who have completed a science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) degree and accept employment with employers enrolled in U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS’) E-Verify employment verification program. Currently, F-1 students who have been enrolled on a full-time basis for at least one full academic year in a Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP)-certified college, university, conservatory, or seminary are eligible for 12 months of OPT to work for a U.S. employer in a job directly related to the student’s major area of study.

The interim rule requires F-1 students with an approved OPT extension to report changes in the student’s name or address and in the employer’s name or address, and periodically to verify the accuracy of this information. The rule also requires the employers of F-1 students with an extension of post-completion OPT authorization to report to the student’s designated school official (DSO) within 48 hours after the OPT student has been terminated from, or otherwise leaves, his or her employment with that employer before the end of the authorized period of OPT. The interim final rule also implements a programmatic change to allow students to apply for OPT within 60 days of finishing their studies.

USCIS said the interim rule ameliorates the so-called “cap-gap’ problem by extending the authorized period of stay for all F-1 students who have a properly filed H-1B petition and change of status request (filed under the cap for the next fiscal year) pending with USCIS. If USCIS approves the H-1B petition, the students will have an extension that enables them to remain in the U.S. until the requested start date as indicated in the H-1B petition takes effect.

The interim rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-7427.pdf. A 30-page SEVP policy guidance document on post-completion OPT has been posted at http://www.ice.gov/doclib/sevis/pdf/opt_policy_guidance_pdf.pdf. Information about E-Verify is at http://www.dhs.gov/e-verify.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Revises I-765 To Add F-1 Eligibility Codes

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on April 24, 2008, that it has revised the Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) to include additional eligibility codes under the Department of Homeland Security’s interim final rule regarding Optional Practical Training (OPT), published on April 8, 2008. The rule modifies the conditions and duration of OPT for qualified F-1 nonimmigrant students.

USCIS will accept the July 30, 2007, edition of the form through July 8, 2008. As of July 9, USCIS will only accept the revised Form I-765, dated April 4, 2008, and will reject all requests using previous editions of the form.

USCIS’s announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/I-765_24Apr08.pdf. The OPT interim rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-7427.pdf. The revised I-765 is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=73ddd59cb7a5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


4. DOS Issues Annual Guidance on Students and Exchange Visitors

The Department of State has released a cable sent to the field on March 11, 2008, regarding student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) nonimmigrant visa issues. Among other things, the cable notes that first-time visa applicants may be the highest priority when scheduling appointments, and repeat applicants may be scheduled on a lower-priority tier. The cable also clarifies some information on the DS-2019 form, and discusses new Exchange Visitor Program (EVP) sanctions regulations and new Termination of Designation and Revocation of Program regulations, which took effect January 22, 2008. Specifically, some of the major changes in the sanction and termination process include:

  • Sponsors who were at risk of losing their program designations will have their cases heard through a paper review instead of an in-person review.
  • A revised suspension process will freeze sponsors’ operations for 120 days while their qualifications are under review.
  • A new provision allows the Department to terminate an entire class of designated exchange visitor program sponsors if it believes specific programs, sponsors, exchange visitor category(ies), and/or activities compromise the national security of the U.S. or no longer further the Department’s public diplomacy mission.
  • Sponsors on whom the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs imposes lesser sanctions are no longer allowed to appeal.

The cable is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_4202.html. Additional information about the J exchange visitor program is available at http://exchanges.state.gov/education/jexchanges/. Statistics and data tables about foreign students and exchange visitors are available at http://opendoors.iienetwork.org/.

Back to Top


5. USCIS Releases Processing Times for Naturalization Applications Filed During Summer 2007

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has released the projected times for local offices to complete processing of citizenship applications filed during the summer of 2007. Projected processing times at the end of September 2008 range from a high of 14.7 months for Washington, D.C., to a low of 5 months for Helena, Montana.

Last July, USCIS received 460,000 applications for naturalization, which was three times the record for any previous month. For the year, USCIS received 1.4 million naturalization applications, almost double the normal annual volume.

USCIS said it is hiring and training hundreds of additional immigration officers to adjudicate these cases. The agency is also conducting naturalization interviews on weekends, after normal business hours, and in additional locations.

The processing times, USCIS said, “provide a sense of how quickly a case may be processed if there are no complicating factors,” noting that some cases will take longer to complete; for example, if an applicant has been asked to submit additional information or fails the naturalization test, or if the FBI namecheck is in progress.

The projected processing times are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=2de02ad51e679110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

Back to Top


6. DHS Proposes Biometric Airport and Seaport Exit Procedures

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed a rule on April 22, 2008, that would establish biometric exit procedures at all U.S air and sea ports of departure. The majority of non-U.S. citizens and non-permanent residents, except for Canadians, are already required to submit digital fingerprints and a digital photograph for admission into the country. The US-VISIT exit proposal would require non-U.S. citizens who provide biometric identifiers for admission to provide digital fingerprints when departing the U.S. from any air or sea ports of departure.

The DHS said that visitors departing the U.S. should continue to return their paper Form I-94 or Form I-94W to airline or ship representatives. The DHS completed a test of biometric exit procedures at several U.S. airports and seaports last year. Based on the results, the DHS determined that biometric exit procedures must be integrated into the existing traveler process to ensure compliance and provide visitors with a consistent experience from port to port.

The proposed rule would require commercial air carriers and cruise line owners and operators to collect and transmit international visitors’ biometric information to DHS within 24 hours of leaving the U.S. Carriers are already required to transmit biographic information to DHS for all passengers before their departure from the U.S. The proposed rule does not designate a specific location within the port of departure for biometric collection and does not apply to small carriers or vessel owners and operators, or to general aviation.

The rule proposes a performance standard that requires the carriers to collect biometric information on the premises of the facility from which the passenger departs the U.S., but provides the carriers with some discretion in the manner of collection and submission to allow the carriers to meet the requirements in the most efficient and cost-effective manner.

The DHS requests public comments on all of the alternatives discussed in the proposed rule and the underlying assumptions and analyses. Although the proposed rule identifies means for collection of biometrics, personnel, and methods of transmission, the agency said it also welcomes proposals on alternatives that have not been proposed in the rule. The most useful proposals or alternatives, the DHS said, would include information on how the proposed alternative would reduce the burden on travelers and the travel industry without sacrificing accuracy in the collection of biometric information.

The DHS intends to implement air and sea biometric exit procedures by January 2009, fulfilling a key provision of the Implementing the Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007. The DHS said the proposed rule will enable the DHS to retain the necessary authority to manage the Visa Waiver Program effectively. If the exit program has not been implemented by June 30, 2009, the department may not be able to extend Visa Waiver Program privileges to new countries. The agency said the waiver authority is critical for the U.S. to invite more of its allies to participate in the Visa Waiver Program.

Comments may be submitted via:

  • Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number (DHS-2008-0039) for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
  • Mail: Written comments may be submitted to: Michael Hardin, Senior Policy Advisor, US–VISIT, Department of Homeland Security; 1616 North Fort Myer Drive, 18th Floor, Arlington, Virginia  22209. Submissions must include the agency name and docket number (DHS-2008-0039).

The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-8956.pdf. Following the 60?day public comment period and review, a final rule will be published outlining the new requirements and their effective date.

Meanwhile, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) held an oversight hearing on the Department of Homeland Security. The sole witness was Secretary Michael Chertoff. Among other things, Sen. Leahy discussed his concerns about the Department’s implementation of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative. “The Department must now make good use of the time Congress has given to make sure that implementation goes smoothly, and to minimize disruption in Americans’ lives and in our relationships with our good neighbors to the north and south,” he said. Sen. Leahy added that “I also share the view of many on both sides of the aisle and across the country about the so-called REAL ID Act and its unfunded mandates for States.” In advance of the hearing, Sen. Leahy said, “The good news is that the Bush administration will not fight the new law that moves the passport requirement to next year. The bad news is that there is little reason to believe DHS will be ready even then.” Statements from Sen. Leahy and Secretary Chertoff are available at http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=3226.

Back to Top


7. ICE Arrests Hundreds of Workers

In April, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested hundreds of undocumented workers, including more than 300 workers at Pilgrim’s Pride poultry plants in five states who are suspected of committing identity theft and other criminal violations to obtain their jobs.

ICE special agents also detained 45 undocumented workers at 10 sites and arrested 11 individuals for conspiring to harbor undocumented workers who were smuggled into the U.S. to work in Mexican restaurants in four states. This operation involved approximately 130 ICE agents and 30 state and local law enforcement officers and began in May 2006.

ICE agents interviewed roughly 100 employees at a resort in Leesburg, Virginia. Agents arrested 53 immigration status violators and another six were apprehended outside the facility. The 59 workers are nationals of El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Honduras, Bolivia, Peru, and Argentina. All face removal proceedings.

Details on the arrests are available at http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/enforcement/.

Back to Top


8. DHS Signs Visa Waiver Agreement With Korea

On April 18, 2008, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff signed a Visa Waiver Program (VWP) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Yu Myung-hwan. The security enhancements outlined in the agreement “put[ ] Korea on the path toward visa-free travel to the U.S., and potential designation as a VWP member as early as later this year,” the DHS announcement states.

The DHS said it plans to establish an electronic system of travel authorization for air passengers. VWP travelers will be asked to provide some basic information online, which will generate an authorization number for travel. The agency said it will announce details on how the authorization systems will work, and when they will begin, later this year.

The VWP has 27 current members from Asia and Europe. The U.S. has signed enhanced VWP agreements with the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Slovakia, Hungary, Lithuania and Malta in recent weeks. Each country has committed to meeting the new security requirements of the program.

The announcement is at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1208545066700.shtm.

Back to Top


9. House Holding Series of Immigration Hearings

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), and chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Cal.), announced that an oversight hearing held April 16, 2008, on the H-2B program was the first in a series of immigration hearings to be held by the subcommittee and the full Judiciary Committee.

“Over the past year, it has become clear that we need an immigration system that is fair, legal, and tough,” said Rep. Conyers. The series will be conducted in coordination with several other House committees.

The Judiciary Committee’s announcement is available at http://judiciary.house.gov/newscenter.aspx?A=954. Testimony from the H-2B hearing has been posted to the House Web site (http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=432). Testimony has been posted (http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=435) for a hearing on wasted visas and growing backlogs held on April 30, 2008.

Back to Top


10. Expensive Virtual Border Fence To Be Replaced

Just two months after Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff accepted the Boeing Co.’s completed $20 million virtual fence along portions of the border with Mexico, the agency announced it will replace the Arizona-Mexico virtual fence with new radios, cameras, towers, and computer software. Customs and Border Protection officials recently acknowledged that the “Project 28” pilot program is not working sufficiently. Border Patrol agents in the Tucson sector agreed with Boeing’s conceptual design of Project 28 but said the final system might have been more useful if they and others had been given an opportunity to provide feedback throughout the process, according to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report issued in February 2008.

An article about plans to replace the virtual fence is available at http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=39838&dcn=e_gvet. A GAO report on border security, issued in March 2008, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08542t.pdf. The GAO report issued in February 2008, detailing some of the problems with the virtual fence program, is available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08508t.pdf.

Back to Top


11. New Publications and Items of Interest

How immigration is saving Social Security. The New York Times published an editorial on April 2, 2008, “How Immigrants Saved Social Security.” The editorial argues that undocumented immigration has had an even better effect on Social Security than legal immigration. The editorial is available at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/opinion/02wed3.html?_r=2&ref=opinion&oref=slogin&oref=slogin.

2007 LPR statistics. The Department of Homeland Security has posted online the Annual Flow Report: U.S. Legal Permanent Residents: 2007, published March 2008. The Office of Immigration Statistics report presents information, obtained from applications for lawful permanent resident (LPR) status, on the number and characteristics of persons who became LPRs in the U.S. during 2007.

The report notes that employment-based immigrant preference categories, including principals and their dependents, represented 15 percent of the total LPR flow in 2007, up from 13 percent in 2006. The LPR flow for employment preferences increased 2 percent from 159,081 in 2006 to 162,176 in 2007, but was below the record of 246,877 set in 2005. The large number of LPRs in the employment preferences in 2005 was primarily due to the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act of 2000 (AC21). This Act resulted in the recapture of 130,107 unused employment-based visa numbers from 1999 and 2000 to be made available to first, second, and third preference employment-based immigrants once the annual limit had been reached. Approximately 94,000 of those recaptured visa numbers were used in 2005, none were used in 2006, and 7,312 were used in 2007.

In addition, provisions of the REAL ID Act of 2005 resulted in the recapture of 50,000 unused employment-based visas from 2001 to 2004, of which 11,950 were used in 2005, 33,335 were used in 2006, and 4,743 were used in 2007. The number of employment-based LPRs for 2007 includes 10,849 recaptured REAL ID visas. The majority of these visas were issued to individuals whose country of origin was the Philippines (64 percent) or India (21 percent). As a result of the use of additional visas recaptured by provisions of the AC21 and the REAL ID Act, the number of employment-based preferences in 2007 was greater than the annual limit of 147,148.

The report is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/LPR_FR_2007.pdf.

Drew Carey video. “The Beckham Factor,” a video clip from Drew Carey about U.S. attitudes toward immigration, is available at http://www.truthinimmigration.org/CompleteStory.aspx?sid=25.

Immigration dashboard for human resource professionals. Angelo Paparelli, President of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers, has written an article with Lily S. Hensel, “An Immigration Dashboard for Human Resource Professionals.” The article provides employers with key “dashboard” elements:

  • Practical information concerning basic principles of work-related immigration law
  • Eligibility criteria for the most popular work-visa categories
  • Best practices when hiring or continuing to employ foreign and domestic workers
  • Recommended procedures to follow after receipt of a “no-match” letter
  • Useful tips to make sure that foreign workers maintain lawful immigration status throughout the employment relationship and are not prevented from working by delayed security clearances or restrictions on travel abroad and reentry to the United States
  • Guidance on ways to limit or minimize liability, or negative, unintended immigration-related outcomes affecting the workforce and the employment relationship

The article is available at http://www.abil.com/articles/Immigration%20Dashboard%20for%20HR%20Professionals.pdf.

Back to Top


12. Recent News from ABIL Members

Angelo Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm), President of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers, has spoken recently about employment verification, the I-9 process, and “getting your house in order” in light of the recent ICE raids on companies hiring undocumented workers. An MP3 recording of Mr. Paparelli speaking on this issue is available at the following link: Angelo Paparelli talks about immigration labor laws 5:40 MP3. Mr. Paparelli will be speaking on June 12, 2008, in Pentagon City on the topic, “New Corporation = New Visa?” (http://www.entertheusa.com/events/0803_pentagon.pdf) and will speak on a panel on corporate compliance at the annual American Immigration Lawyers Association’s conference to be held June 25-28, 2008, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

H. Ronald Klasko (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm), the founding partner of the immigration law firm Klasko, Rulon, Stock & Seltzer LLP, recently spoke on “Trends in Immigration: Impact on Higher Education” at the College and University Professional Association for Human Resources’ Public Policy Forum in Washington, D.C. Mr. Klasko discussed immigration legislative prospects, employer compliance and best practices involving verifying the status of a university’s workforce, dealing with PERM labor certification matters, and the impact of the immigration application backlog. University human resources directors from around the U.S. attended the forum.

Webinar on EB-5 visa. Panelists Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) and Carolyn S. Lee will discuss the terrain and the pitfalls of the EB-5 visa, with a “how to” focus. This webinar is intended to impart an understanding of the EB-5 visa from both legal and practical perspectives. More information on the webinar and registration is available at https://millermayerevents.webex.com/mw0305l/mywebex/default.do?nomenu=true&siteurl=millermayerevents&service=6&main_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmillermayerevents.webex.com%2Fec0600l%2Feventcenter%2Fevent%2FeventAction.do%3FtheAction%3Ddetail%26confViewID%3D277932350%26siteurl%3Dmillermayerevents%26%26%26. If you have any questions, e-mail immig@millermayer.com.

Poorvi Chothani (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-chothani.cfm) was quoted recently in the Economic Times/India Times on visa hurdles in India. She noted that nationals from sensitive countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and China have more difficulty getting work visas. “Last year, in a span of two months, we helped a U.S. bank with back-office operations in India with about 18 business visas for their personnel from at least four jurisdictions. In our experience, the maximum applicants have been from the banking, investment and private equity sectors. Some have been from the technology and ITeS sectors,” Ms. Chothani said. The full text of the article is available at http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News_By_Industry/Indl_Goods__Svs/articlelist/13357688.cms.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2976676.cms

Back to Top

 

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-05-01 00:00:452019-09-18 02:55:25News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 5 • May 01, 2008

News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 4 • April 01, 2008

April 01, 2008/in Immigration Insider /by ABIL

Headlines:

1. Employers to File FY 2009 H-1B Petitions on April 1; USCIS Publishes Interim Rule Prohibiting Multiple H-1B Petitions for Same Employee – The H-1B supply is expected to be exhausted immediately; USCIS published an interim final rule prohibiting employers from filing multiple H-1B petitions for the same employee.

2. DHS Issues No-Match Supplemental Proposed Rule; Public Comments Accepted Until April 25 – The agency seems determined to press ahead with its previously stated plans despite concerns about their potential negative impact.

3. USCIS Issues Guidance on H-1B Specialty Occupation Licensure Requirements – USCIS issued guidance on H-1B petitions for specialty occupations when a required professional license cannot be obtained because of state licensing requirements mandating possession of a valid immigration document.

4. Biometrics Required for Re-Entry Permits and Refugee Travel Documents – The revised I-131 instructions require applicants for re-entry permits and refugee travel documents to provide biometrics.

5. PERM Data Released – More than 85,100 PERM cases were certified during FY 2007.

6. WHTI-Compliant Document To Be Required for Land, Sea Travel Into the U.S. – Effective June 1, 2009, travelers will be required to present a passport or other approved secure document denoting citizenship and identity for all land and sea travel into the U.S.

7. Around the States: Rhode Island, Virginia Crackdowns; NYC Losing to Competition – Along with a reduction in undocumented residents, immigration crackdowns will have a substantial impact on legal residents and on the economy.

8. NYC Staffing Company Charged With Violating H-1B Program – An investigation by the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division found that 156 H-1B workers from the Philippines, brought into the U.S. by Advanced Professional Marketing, Inc. (APMI), a medical staffing company, are owed almost $3 million in back wages.

9. Company Managers Indicted for Hiring Unauthorized Workers; E-Mails Used as Evidence – In 2006, raids were conducted on 52 IFCO workshops, which revealed problems with the Social Security numbers of half of the company’s 5,800 employees.

10. India Second Preference Visa Numbers Available in April; Iraqi, Afghani Translator Numbers Going Fast – Visa numbers have once again become available to the India employment second preference category; the FY 2008 numerical limitation of 500 visas in the special immigrant translator category will be reached soon.

11. DHS Collecting 10 Fingerprints at JFK Airport – JFK is the tenth port of entry to begin collecting 10 fingerprints from international visitors.

12. Hard Times Expected at Toronto Consulate – The consulate expects a severe staffing shortage this summer.

13. Visa Waiver Agreements Signed With Eastern European Countries – Visa waiver agreements have been signed with Slovakia, Hungary, Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia, putting those countries on the path toward possible designation as Visa Waiver Program members later this year.

14. New Publications and Items of Interest – New Publications and Items of Interest

15. Recent News from ABIL Members – Recent News from ABIL Members


Details:

1. Employers to File FY 2009 H-1B Petitions on April 1; USCIS Publishes Interim Rule Prohibiting Multiple H-1B Petitions for Same Employee

On April 1, 2008, employers may file petitions requesting H-1B workers for fiscal year (FY) 2009 employment starting on October 1, 2008. For FY 2009, Congress has once again set a tight limit of 65,000 for most H-1B workers, and the supply is expected to be exhausted immediately. Last year, the cap was reached in one day.

USCIS published an interim final rule, effective March 24, 2008, that prohibits employers from filing multiple H-1B petitions for the same employee. USCIS said the changes “will ensure that companies filing H-1B petitions subject to congressionally mandated numerical limits have an equal chance to employ an H-1B worker.” USCIS will deny or revoke multiple petitions filed by an employer for the same H-1B worker and will not refund the filing fees submitted with multiple or duplicative petitions. USCIS noted that the interim rule does not preclude related employers (such as a parent company and its subsidiary) from filing petitions on behalf of the same worker for different positions, based on a legitimate business need.

The first 20,000 H-1B workers who have a U.S. master’s degree or higher are exempt from the cap. Under current procedures, which are not changed by this rule, once USCIS receives 20,000 petitions for aliens with a U.S. master’s degree or higher, all other cases requesting the educational exemption are counted toward the 65,000 cap. Once the 65,000 cap is reached for a fiscal year, USCIS announces that the cap has been filled and rejects further petitions subject to the cap.

The rule stipulates that if USCIS determines that the number of H-1B petitions received meets the cap within the first five business days of accepting applications for the coming fiscal year, USCIS will apply a random selection process among all H-1B petitions received during that time period. If the 20,000 advanced-degree limit is reached during the first five business days, USCIS will randomly select from those petitions before conducting the random selection for the 65,000 limit. Petitions subject to the 20,000 limit that are not selected in that random process will be considered along with the other H-1B petitions in the random selection for the 65,000 limit.

The interim rule further clarifies that USCIS will deny petitions that incorrectly claim an exemption from any H-1B numerical limits. Those filing fees will not be returned. Under current procedures, which are not changed by this rule, once U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) receives 20,000 petitions for aliens with a U.S. master’s degree or higher, all other cases requesting the educational exemption are counted toward the 65,000 cap. Once the 65,000 cap is reached for a fiscal year, USCIS will announce that the cap has been filled and reject further petitions subject to the cap.

As noted above, H-1B availability is likely to be exhausted immediately. Contact your Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers member for guidance in particular cases.

The interim final rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-5906.pdf. A USCIS press release announcing the interim rule is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/H-1B_multi_filing_19Mar08.pdf. A fact sheet with additional details is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=fb68c9b9d87c8110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. Questions and answers are available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=0189c9b9d87c8110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD.

In other H-1B news, the March 2008 edition of Business Week noted that two outsourcing companies based in Bangalore, India, top the list of approved H-1B visa petitions in 2007: Infosys Technologies (4,559 visas) and Wipro (2,567 visas). Six of the top 10 H-1B visa recipients are based in India, and Indian outsourcers received nearly 80 percent of the visas approved for the top 10 participants in the H-1B program. Infosys has 88,000 workers worldwide, with 9,000 of those in the U.S., including 7,500 H-1Bs.

Bill Gates testified on March 12, 2008, before the House of Representatives’ Committee on Science and Technology about the “gathering threat to U.S. preeminence in science and technology innovation.” He proposed a four-part plan, including revamping immigration rules for highly skilled workers so that U.S. companies can attract and retain the world’s best scientific talent. As a result of an artificially low H-1B cap and “counterproductive immigration policies,” he said, many U.S. firms, including Microsoft, have been forced to locate staff in countries that welcome skilled foreign workers to do work that otherwise could have been done in the U.S. Mr. Gates said that an increase in the number of H-1B visas likely would increase employment of U.S. nationals as well, citing a study of technology companies in the S&P 500 that found that for every H-1B visa requested, leading U.S. technology companies increased their overall employment by five workers.

Mr. Gates’s testimony before the House committee is available at http://democrats.science.house.gov/Media/File/Commdocs/hearings/2008/Full/12mar/gates_testimony_12mar08.pdf.

A policy brief on H-1B visas and job creation by the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP), which notes that hiring H-1B visa holders is associated with increases in employment at U.S. technology companies, is available at http://www.nfap.com/pdf/080311h1b.pdf. An NFAP policy brief on job openings and the need for skilled labor in the U.S. economy is at http://www.nfap.com/pdf/080311talentsrc.pdf.

Back to Top


2. DHS Issues No-Match Supplemental Proposed Rule; Public Comments Accepted Until April 25

On March 26, 2008, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a supplemental proposed rule on procedures for employers who receive a “no-match letter” from the Social Security Administration (SSA) or a “notice of suspect document” from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) casting doubt on the employment eligibility of the employer’s workers. The previous final rule, which was published on August 15, 2007, was preliminarily enjoined by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on October 10, 2007. The DHS issued the new supplemental proposed rule to clarify certain aspects of the August 2007 final rule and to respond to three findings underlying the district court’s injunction.

The agency seems essentially determined to press ahead with its previously stated plans despite concerns about their potential negative impact. The New York Timeswarned in a March 27, 2008, editorial that the DHS’s plan will “throw thousands of law-abiding American workers and companies off a cliff in perilous economic times,” noting that the SSA’s inspector general estimated that about 17.8 million of the agency’s 435 million records contain errors that could lead to a no-match letter, and that 70 percent of those 17.8 million records belong to native-born Americans.

The DHS’s supplemental proposed rule addresses three findings of the district court, which questioned whether the DHS had: (1) supplied a reasoned analysis to justify what the court viewed as a change in the DHS’s position: that a no-match letter may be sufficient, by itself, to put an employer on notice, and thus impart constructive knowledge, that employees referenced in the letter may not be work-authorized; (2) exceeded its authority (and encroached on the authority of the Department of Justice [DOJ]) by interpreting the antidiscrimination provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986; and (3) violated the Regulatory Flexibility Act by not conducting analysis of the rule’s impact on small businesses.

The DHS noted that although the mere receipt of an SSA no-match letter may not obligate employers to repeat the full I–9 employment verification process, employers “cannot turn a blind eye to SSA no-match letters and should perform reasonable due diligence.” The supplemental proposed rule emphasizes the idea of eliminating ambiguity and confusion regarding an employer’s responsibilities upon receipt of a no-match letter, acknowledging that previous guidance was in the form of case-by-case responses to individual queries from employers and others, resulting in a lack of uniformity and multiple interpretations by employers.

The DHS said that SSA no-match letters are sent to employers whose wage reports reveal at least 11 workers with no-matches, and where the total number of no-matches represents more than 0.5 percent of the employer’s total Forms W-2 in the report. The agency believes these criteria limit the recipients of employer no-match letters to those who have potentially significant problems with their employees’ work authorization. Employers with stray mistakes or minor inaccuracies in their records, the DHS said, do not receive employer no-match letters. As a result, the DHS concluded that employers who receive no-match letters cannot reasonably assume the problems are merely trivial clerical errors, and therefore cannot reasonably simply ignore those letters. The DHS therefore finds that an employer’s failure to conduct reasonable due diligence upon receipt of an SSA no-match letter can, in the totality of the circumstances, establish constructive knowledge of an employee’s unauthorized status.

The DHS noted that the August 2007 final rule specifies actions that can be taken by an employer that the agency will consider to be a reasonable response to receiving an SSA no-match letter or DHS letter, which “will eliminate the possibility that either letter can be used as any part of an allegation that an employer had constructive knowledge that it was employing an alien not authorized to work in the United States.”

In light of the district court’s concerns about the DHS’s possible encroachment into the authority of DOJ, in the March 2008 supplemental proposed rule the DHS rescinds the statements in the preamble of the August 2007 final rule describing employers’ obligations under antidiscrimination law and discussing the potential for antidiscrimination liability faced by employers that follow the “safe-harbor” procedures set forth in the August 2007 rule. For example, the DHS is rescinding conclusive statements from the preamble of the August 2007 final rule such as, “employers who follow the safe harbor procedures…will not be found to have engaged in unlawful discrimination.” The DHS said it also will “revisit” the language in its insert letter after the supplemental proposed rule is finalized. The rescissions do not change existing law or require any change to the rule text, the DHS noted.

Employers seeking information regarding their antidiscrimination obligations in following the safe harbor procedures in the August 2007 final rule, as modified by the March 2008 supplemental rule, should review new guidance from the DOJ’s Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices at http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/osc/index.html. Employers may also seek advice on a case-by-case basis through OSC’s toll-free employer hotline at 1–800–255–8155. The DOJ’s public guidance on employers’ antidiscrimination obligations will be published in a Federal Register notice when the DHS promulgates the March 2008 supplemental proposed rule as a final rule.

The DHS is proposing to further clarify two aspects of the August 2007 final rule. First, the rule instructs employers seeking safe harbor that they must “promptly” notify an affected employee after the employer has completed its internal records checks and has been unable to resolve the mismatch. After reviewing the history of the rulemaking, the DHS believes that this obligation for prompt notice ordinarily would be satisfied if the employer contacts the employee within five business days after the employer has completed its internal records review. The DHS emphasized that an employer does not need to wait until after completing this internal review to advise affected employees that the employer has received the no-match letter and request that the employees seek to resolve the mismatch: “Immediately notifying an employee of the mismatch upon receipt of the letter may be the most expeditious means of resolving the mismatch.”

Second, plaintiffs in the litigation before the district court raised a question as to whether, under the August 2007 final rule, an employer could be found liable on a constructive knowledge theory for failing to conduct due diligence in response to the appearance of an employee hired before November 6, 1986, in an SSA no-match letter. The DHS noted that when Congress enacted INA section 274A as part of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, it included a grandfather clause in that legislation exempting workers hired before IRCA’s date of enactment from the provisions of section 274A(a)(1) and (a)(2). Because those statutory bars against hiring or continuing to employ individuals without work authorization do not apply to workers within that grandfather clause, the DHS said that the August 2007 final rule, as published and as supplemented, does not apply to any such workers that may be listed in an SSA no-match letter.

The DHS said it has filed an appeal to have the preliminary injunction dissolved. The agency is continuing this simultaneous rulemaking in the meantime, which it said is intended to lead to the rule becoming effective as quickly as possible and “is not a concession of any issue pending in the litigation.”

Comments are due by April 25, 2008, and should be submitted using the procedures outlined in the supplemental proposed rule, which details the DHS’s position on the district court’s ruling and includes information on estimated costs of compliance for employers. The supplemental proposed rule is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-6168.pdf. A press release is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1206124972832.shtm.

Employers may also wish to consider using E-Verify, an Internet-based system operated by the DHS in partnership with the SSA that allows participating employers to verify the employment eligibility of their newly hired employees, including the validity of their Social Security Numbers. E-Verify is available at http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/programs/gc_1185221678150.shtm.

Contact your Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers member for legal guidance and assistance in particular cases.

Back to Top


3. USCIS Issues Guidance on H-1B Specialty Occupation Licensure Requirements

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) sent guidance to the field on March 21, 2008, updating the Adjudicator’s Field Manual on accepting and adjudicating H-1B petitions for specialty occupations when a required professional license cannot be obtained because of state licensing requirements mandating possession of a valid immigration document, such as an approved H-1B petition, as evidence of employment authorization before the license can be issued. USCIS noted that this situation creates a “Catch-22” adjudicative difficulty for the agency because approval of the H-1B petition may be contingent on the beneficiary’s possession of the required license. USCIS stated that in such situations, it will allow the temporary approval of the petition provided all other requirements are met. Such an approval will not constitute authorization for the beneficiary to practice his or her profession without the required license but should be considered “merely a means to facilitate the State or local licensing authority’s issuance of such a license.”

USCIS instructed adjudicators to approve an H-1B petition for a one-year validity period if a state or local license to engage in the profession is required and the appropriate licensing authority will not grant the license absent evidence that the beneficiary has been granted H-1B status. As a condition to approving such a petition, USCIS stated, the beneficiary must demonstrate that he or she has filed the licensing application in accordance with state or local rules and procedures. Further, adjudicators should verify that the beneficiary is fully qualified to receive the license, meaning that all educational, training, experience, and other substantive requirements must be met at the time of filing of the petition. Where appropriate, USCIS noted, the adjudicator may issue a request for evidence.

Any petition that requests an extension of stay on behalf of a beneficiary who has been granted H-1B status under this provisional measure, USCIS said, must show that the beneficiary has obtained the requisite license. If he or she has not obtained the license at the time the petition and extension are filed, the petition will be denied.

USCIS referenced earlier guidance applicable in other contexts. For example, in 2001 the agency’s precursor, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, instructed adjudicators to approve H-1B petitions for a one-year period for teachers who could not obtain state licensure unless they could obtain social security numbers, which in turn could not be obtained unless the teachers were already authorized to work in the U.S. At the end of the one-year period, the teacher was required to file another petition with a request for extension, and also present evidence at such time that the license had been obtained.

The memorandum is available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/AFM_Update_Chap31_21Mar08.pdf.

Back to Top


4. Biometrics Required for Re-Entry Permits and Refugee Travel Documents

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued revised instructions, effective March 5, 2008, for the Application for Travel Document (Form I-131). The revised instructions require applicants for re-entry permits and refugee travel documents to provide biometrics (e.g., fingerprints, photographs) at USCIS Application Support Centers (ASCs). USCIS will notify applicants of their appointments at designated ASCs after submission of the I-131 application.

The new instructions for the I-131 require that applicants for re-entry permits and refugee travel documents who are ages 14 through 79 provide biometrics before departing from the U.S. Applicants for re-entry permits and refugee travel documents who are in the U.S. must pay an $80 biometrics fee or submit a fee waiver request with sufficient documentation. The $305 I-131 application fee cannot be waived. The I-131 instructions also provide guidance for certain persons applying for refugee travel documents (not re-entry permits) who are abroad at the time of filing, on visiting a U.S. Embassy or consulate for fingerprinting.

The announcement is available at http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=9c7c6a41ccf78110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD. The I-131 instructions are available at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-131instr.pdf and the form is at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-131.pdf.

Back to Top


5. PERM Data Released

The Employment and Training Administration’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) recently released fiscal year (FY) 2007 data covering cases processed under the Permanent Labor Certification Program. Selected statistics include:

  • More than 85,100 PERM cases were certified during FY 2007.
  • Foreign workers representing 176 countries were certified for permanent work in the U.S.
  • Nearly 6 out of 10 PERM cases were certified for small employers (defined as fewer than 250 workers).
  • Top states: California (20,222), New York (8,843), New Jersey (6,594), Texas (6,534), Florida (5,128).
  • Top countries: India (24,573), China (6,846), Mexico (6,442), South Korea (5,159), Canada (4,837).
  • Top employers: Microsoft Corporation; Cognizant Technologies; Oracle USA, Incorporated; Intel Corporation; Ernst & Young, LLP; Motorola Incorporated.

The PERM data is available at http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/PERM_Data_FY07_Announcement.pdf.

Back to Top


6. WHTI-Compliant Document To Be Required for Land, Sea Travel Into the U.S.

Effective June 1, 2009, travelers will be required to present a passport or other approved secure document denoting citizenship and identity for all land and sea travel into the U.S., the Departments of Homeland Security and State announced. The final rule for the land and sea portion of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI), announced March 27, 2008, will apply to previously exempt travelers, including citizens of the U.S., Canada and Bermuda.

The DHS said it is releasing the WHTI land and sea final rule more than a year in advance of its implementation to give the public ample notice and time to obtain the WHTI-compliant documents they will need to enter or re-enter the U.S. on or after June 1, 2009. The agency noted that many cross-border travelers already have WHTI-compliant documents, such as a passport or a Trusted Traveler Card (NEXUS, SENTRI, and FAST), or a Washington state enhanced driver’s license (EDL). The Department of State is already accepting applications for new passport cards and additional states and Canadian provinces will be issuing EDLs in the next several months, all of which the DHS said are options specifically designed for land and sea border use.

Beginning June 1, 2009, DHS will institute special provisions that allow school or other organized groups of children ages 18 and under who are U.S. or Canadian citizens to enter the U.S. with proof of citizenship alone.

Information on specific documentation requirements is available for U.S. citizens at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/vacation/ready_set_go/ and for non-U.S. citizens at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/id_visa/. The full text of the final rule is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/whti_landseafinalrule.pdf. The DHS has also designated the enhanced driver’s license and identity document issued by Washington state as a travel document under the WHTI. Questions and answers on the WHTI final rule are available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1206635771151.shtm.

Back to Top


7. Around the States: Rhode Island, Virginia Crackdowns; NYC Losing to Competition

State and local authorities in several locations continued efforts to crack down on undocumented immigration. In Rhode Island, Governor Don Carcieri, under pressure because of a massive budget deficit, signed an executive order directing state police to enter into an agreement with federal immigration authorities to permit access by the police to immigration databases. Such access would give them the ability to check the immigration status of criminals, victims, witnesses, and those supplying the police with confidential tips, according to state police Major Steven O’Donnell. The prison system is expected to negotiate a similar agreement. The executive order also requires businesses and state agencies to verify the status of employees.

As of March 3, 2008, Prince William County in Virginia requires police officers to inquire about immigration status during arrests or traffic stops whenever there is probable cause to suspect that an immigration violation has occurred. The Board of County Supervisors resolution also requires verification of immigration status by county staff before certain public services can be provided.

A team of sociologists and law enforcement experts from the University of Virginia, James Madison University, and the Police Executive Research Forum is expected to conduct a two-year study to examine the consequences of the Prince William policy. Meanwhile, Latinos reportedly already have been fleeing the county for months because of a combination of factors, including the immigration crackdown, a downturn in the construction industry, and the mortgage crisis. Latino-run businesses are teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, and churches and soccer leagues are losing members. Entire strip malls have been “transformed into ghost towns,” according to the WashingtonPost.

Legal immigrants are also feeling the pinch. Santos Perdomo, a Prince William legal resident and business owner who also owns two houses, noted that many Hispanics are leaving. He plans to stay, although he noted that he no longer wants to give to the county police fund. “Even though I am legal, I feel rejected. This law has ruined all the good feelings. When I came here 12 years ago, my neighbors sent me pies. Now they look at me differently.”

The crackdown is expected to cost the county millions of dollars in enforcement costs and to affect tax revenues. The county has proposed a 28 percent property tax increase to make up for budget shortfalls. Similar efforts in Riverside, New Jersey, led to “chang[ing] the face of Riverside,” according to former mayor Charles Hilton, who noted that “[t]he business district is [now] fairly vacant.”

Along with a reduction in undocumented residents, it is clear that the policy in Prince William, and others like it nationwide, will have a substantial impact on legal residents and on the local economy over the next few years.

In other news, senior executives of large corporations, small and midsize companies, and investment banks have expressed concerns that harsh immigration policies are threatening New York City’s ability to compete with foreign cities because the people chosen to take high-paying jobs cannot gain admission to the U.S. Some officials reportedly said that they have shifted dozens of jobs to other financial capitals because of the difficulty in obtaining visas for foreign workers.

Kathryn S. Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York City, said, “New York’s ability to compete with London, which has much more open immigration, or with the emerging financial capitals in Asia and the Middle East, depends on mobility of talent, both in terms of new and current employees. What people miss is, New York’s standing as an international capital of business and finance depends on the professionals within these companies being able to come to New York to be trained and groomed for leadership positions around the world.” She noted that opposing business immigration is “a 20th-century, pre-globalization mentality that thinks somehow American companies and jobs can grow if we cut ourselves off from foreign talent.” A senior project manager for British bank Barclays said he took a job in London over one in New York City mainly because of the uncertainty of H-1B renewals and the “whole visa situation,” which he termed a “nightmare.”

Back to Top


8. NYC Staffing Company Charged With Violating H-1B Program

An investigation by the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division found that 156 H-1B workers from the Philippines, brought into the U.S. by Advanced Professional Marketing Inc. (APMI), a medical staffing company based in New York City, to be employed primarily as physical therapists in hospitals and other medical facilities in the New York metropolitan area, are owed almost $3 million in back wages. The investigation revealed that APMI willfully failed to pay required wages, filed lawsuits seeking penalties against some H-1B employees for early cessation of employment, failed to make required documents available for examination, failed to maintain required documentation, and used incorrect prevailing wage rates on labor condition applications.

A determination letter outlines the alleged violations and assesses civil money penalties totaling $512,000 for the violations. It also directs APMI and the company’s president, Marissa Beck, to pay back wages in the amount of $2,920,270 to the 156 H-1B workers. Finally, the letter informs the company and Ms. Beck of their right to request a hearing on this determination before a Labor Department administrative law judge within 15 days.

The Wage and Hour Division maintains a list below of “willful violator employers” under the H-1B program at http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/immigration/H1BWillfulViolator.htm, and a fact sheet defining what a willful violator employer is at http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/whd/FactSheet62/whdfs62S.pdf.

Back to Top


9. Company Managers Indicted for Hiring Unauthorized Workers; E-Mails Used as Evidence

Five managers of the pallet management division of IFCO Systems North America were recently indicted on felony charges of conspiracy to harbor, encourage and induce, and transport illegal aliens. The evidence included e-mails between middle managers and their superiors. Seven middle managers had pleaded guilty to charges a year ago and promised to cooperate in the investigation. In 2006, raids were conducted on 52 IFCO workshops, which revealed problems with the Social Security numbers of half of the company’s 5,800 employees. The news release announcing the indictments is available at http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/080228albany.htm.
Back to Top


10. India Second Preference Visa Numbers Available in April; Iraqi, Afghani Translator Numbers Going Fast

The Department of State’s Visa Office announced in the April 2008 Visa Bulletin that visa numbers have once again become available to the India employment second preference category.

The Department noted that if total demand is insufficient to use all available numbers in a particular employment preference category in a calendar quarter, the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual “per-country” limit.  Based on the current level of demand, the Department said, there would be otherwise unused numbers in the employment second preference category. The rate of number use in that category will continue to be monitored, and the Department said it may be necessary to make adjustments should the level of demand increase substantially.

The Department also stated that the National Visa Center has already scheduled 485 Iraqi and Afghani special immigrant translator cases for interview in fiscal year 2008.  Of these, 332 special immigrant visa numbers have been issued to principal applicants and another 170 cases are scheduled for March.  Given the number of cases scheduled, along with those still pending, the Department said it is likely that the FY 2008 numerical limitation of 500 visas in this category will be reached soon.

The April 2008 Visa Bulletin is available at http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4177.html.

Back to Top


11. DHS Collecting 10 Fingerprints at JFK Airport

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on March 25, 2008, that it has begun collecting additional fingerprints from international visitors arriving at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK). The change is part of the DHS’s upgrade from two- to 10-fingerprint collection to enhance security and facilitate legitimate travel.

On an average day at JFK, the DHS noted, almost 14,400 international visitors complete biometric procedures. Visitors from Mexico, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, France, and Japan comprise the largest numbers of international visitors arriving at JFK.

JFK is the tenth port of entry to begin collecting 10 fingerprints from international visitors. Washington Dulles International Airport began 10-fingerprint collection on November 29, 2007. Hartsfield?Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Boston Logan International Airport, Chicago O’Hare International Airport, George Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport, San Francisco International Airport, Miami International Airport, Orlando International Airport, and Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport have also begun 10-fingerprint collection.

Under the US?VISIT program, the agency is evaluating 10?fingerprint collection at these airports. It will use the results to inform the deployment of the technology to the remaining air, sea, and land border ports of entry that will transition to collecting 10 fingerprints by December 2008.

The DHS announcement is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1206470846443.shtm.

Back to Top


12. Hard Times Expected at Toronto Consulate

Jeffrey S. Tunis, the consular chief for the U.S. Consulate in Toronto, issued a memorandum on March 5, 2008, stating that the consulate expects a severe staffing shortage this summer and noting that the facility is “solidly booked” with respect to nonimmigrant visa appointments. The consulate is taking steps to reduce its workload, including not accepting any unsolicited telephone calls. The consulate’s Web site is at http://toronto.usconsulate.gov/content/index.asp.
Back to Top


13. Visa Waiver Agreements Signed With Eastern European Countries

Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff has signed visa waiver agreements with the governments of Slovakia, Hungary, Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia. The agreements outline security enhancements that put the countries on the path toward visa-free travel to the U.S. and possible designation as Visa Waiver Program (VWP) members later this year.

The DHS said it will establish an electronic system of travel authorization for air passengers. VWP travelers will be asked to provide some basic information online in advance of their trip, which will generate an authorization number for travel. The DHS plans to announce details on how the authorization systems will work, and when they will begin, later in 2008.

The announcements are available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1205782432579.shtm (Slovakia, Hungary, Lithuania) and http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1205358177498.shtm (Estonia, Latvia). A transcript of Secretary Chertoff’s remarks are available at http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/speeches/sp_1205872910529.shtm.

Back to Top


14. New Publications and Items of Interest

Multilingual resources on entry/exit procedures. US-VISIT biometric entry procedures are currently in place at 116 airports, 15 seaports, and the secondary inspection areas of 154 land ports of entry. Multilingual videos and brochures on the US-VISIT Program’s entry and exit procedures are available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Korean, Arabic, French, German, Hebrew, Japanese, Polish, Russian, Ukrainian, Vietnamese, and Tagalog. Links to these videos and brochures are available at http://www.dhs.gov/xtrvlsec/programs/editorial_0435.shtm. A list of the current ports of entry under US-VISIT is available at http://www.dhs.gov/xtrvlsec/programs/editorial_0685.shtm.

Social Security Trustees report. The 2008 report of the Social Security Trustees notes that last year, there was an estimated overall 75-year deficit of 1.95 percent of taxable payroll; this year, the shortfall is down to 1.70 percent. This translates into a benefit to the Social Security system of about $13 billion per year, according to the Political Animal blog on the CBS News Web site. The main reason for the adjustment was an improvement in the methodology used to estimate taxes and benefits received from “other immigration,” which is undocumented immigration.

The report is available at http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/TR08/trTOC.html. An appendix showing figures related to estimates of net immigration is at http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/TR08/VI_LRsensitivity.html#92900. The article on Political Animal is available at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/25/politics/animal/main3968207.shtml.

Immigration fact sheets. The Immigration Policy Center has launched Immigration OnPoint, an online compilation of fact sheets on immigration. OnPoint documents “aim to confront myths and provide timely and accurate information on a range of immigration-related topics.” Materials will be added and updated on a regular basis. For more information, see http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/onpoint.

Back to Top


15. Recent News from ABIL Members

H. Ronald Klasko (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-klasko.cfm) addressed over 300 immigration lawyers at the Florida Bar Association’s Annual Immigration Law Update in February. He served as a panelist on “Employment Based Immigration: Where Are We Now?” and as the discussion leader on “Federal Court Redress for Adjudication Delays.” He also recently addressed immigration lawyers from Florida on the advantages of using the EB-5 Regional Center Investment Program to assist their foreign clients wishing to invest in the U.S. and get a visa. His speech was part of a program organized by the Philadelphia Regional Center. Mr. Klasko is listed in the 2008 edition of the Best Lawyers in America and was named one of the country’s top immigration lawyers by Chambers Global: The World’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2008.

Angelo Paparelli (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-paparelli.cfm), president of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers, was quoted in the March 14, 2008, edition of the New York Sun commenting on Emilio Gonzalez, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, who is resigning soon. “He really barely rearranged the deck chairs on the Titanic, and has really not done anything to ameliorate the problems of the past few years,” Mr. Paparelli said.

Mr. Paparelli also recently authored, with Lily Hensel, “Immigration and Employment Law in 21st Century America – Parallel Universes Coming Together.” The article notes that increasingly, these specialty areas intersect in many significant ways, particularly as the HR imperatives of “global mobility management” create collaborative opportunities for both practice areas, and the U.S. and state governments introduce and enforce greater worker protections and stricter limits on employer conduct in the immigration space. The article is available at http://www.abil.com/articles/Parallel%20Universes%20Article.pdf.

Stephen Yale-Loehr (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-loehr.cfm) was quoted in the business section of the March 16, 2008, edition of the New York Times. Commenting on the EB-5 immigrant investor program’s progress, he noted, “There were fears that the program wasn’t achieving its intended purpose,” but as a result of streamlining efforts, including permitting “Regional Centers” outside the federal government to screen investors and monitor job creation efforts, “the EB-5 program has risen from the ashes.” Mr. Yale-Loehr is listed in Who’s Who in America and was named one of the country’s top immigration lawyers by Chambers Global: The World’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2008.

Poorvi Chothani (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-chothani.cfm), an ABIL Global member, has published information on Indian immigration, available at http://manupatra.com/etc/mailer/e-Newsline/Upload/default.htm. Ms. Chothani was quoted in the February 21, 2008, edition of a leading business newspaper in Mumbai, the Economic Times. She advised companies and skilled individuals to start planning ahead for their H-1B applications and not leave things to the last moment. The article is available at http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2799405.cms.

Cyrus Mehta (bio: http://www.abil.com/lawyers/lawyers-mehta.cfm) was the Program Chair of the Practising Law Institute’s Immigration Law Basic Seminar on March 20, 2008, in New York and was a speaker at the American Immigration Lawyers Association’s New York Chapter Ethics CLE 101 on March 10, 2008. Additional information on the PLI program and DVDs are available at http://www.pli.edu/product/av_detail.asp?ptid=507&stid=99&id=EN00000000039421.

Back to Top

http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png 0 0 ABIL http://abil.anandprahlad.com/cygnus/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ABIL_Logo-2021.png ABIL2008-04-01 00:00:352019-09-18 02:59:42News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 4, No. 4 • April 01, 2008
Page 26 of 29«‹2425262728›»

Archive

  • July 2020
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006

ABIL is a corporation with over 40 top-rated immigration law firms and 1,500+ professionals.

News

  • BRAZIL: Accepting Work Authorization Applications Thorugh New Digital Certificate System
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9D • September 22, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9C • September 15, 2019
  • News from the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Vol. 15, No. 9B • September 08, 2019

Newsletter Signup

Register to receive news regarding
general business immigration or global
immigration.

© Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers (ABIL) All Rights Reserved 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Home
  • About
  • ABIL Lawyers
  • Global Immigration
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Resources
  • Contact
Scroll to top